Article Information

• PDF (918 kb)

PubMed

• Articles by J. Lavorel
• Articles by P. Joliot

Related Articles

• Charge Recombination and Thermoluminescence in Photosystem I...

  Charge Recombination and Thermoluminescence in Photosystem II Biophysical Journal, Volume 88, Issue 3, 1 March 2005, Pages 1948-1958 Fabrice Rappaport, Aude Cuni, Ling Xiong, Richard Sayre and Jérôme Lavergne Abstract In the recombination process of Photosystem II the limiting step is the electron transfer from the reduced primary acceptor pheophytin to the oxidized primary donor and the rate depends on the equilibrium constant between states and Accordingly, mutations that affect the midpoint potential of or of result in a modified recombination rate. A strong correlation is observed between the effects on the recombination rate and on thermoluminescence (TL, the light emission from during a warming ramp): a slower recombination corresponds to a large enhancement and higher temperature of the TL peak. The current theory of TL does not account for these effects, because it is based on the assumption that the rate-limiting step coincides with the radiative process. When implementing the known fact that the radiative pathway represents a minor leak, the modified TL theory readily accounts qualitatively for the observed behavior. However, the peak temperature is still lower than predicted from the temperature-dependence of recombination. We argue that this reflects the heterogeneity of the recombination process combined with the enhanced sensitivity of TL to slower components. The recombination kinetics are accurately fitted as a sum of two exponentials and we show that this is not due to a progressive stabilization of the charge-separated state, but to a pre-existing conformational heterogeneity. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (189 kb)

• Thermodynamics of Light Emission and Free-Energy Storage in ...

  Thermodynamics of Light Emission and Free-Energy Storage in Photosynthesis Biophysical Journal, Volume 7, Issue 5, 1 September 1967, Pages 595-614 Robert T. Ross and Melvin Calvin Abstract The combined effect of partial thermodynamic reversibility and a finite trapping rate on the amount of luminescence is considered briefly. Abstract | PDF (956 kb)

• Improved differentiation between luminescence decay componen...

  Improved differentiation between luminescence decay components by use of time-resolved optical activity measurements and selective lifetime modulation Biophysical Journal, Volume 70, Issue 4, 1 April 1996, Pages 1996-2000 J.A. Schauerte, A. Gafni and D.G. Steel Abstract The analysis of luminescence decay experiments from proteins is typically modeled as a combination of independent first-order decay functions. However, Poisson noise in the photon counting experiment limits the ability of this approach to resolve decay components from separate lumiphores with similar lifetimes. To provide further differentiation, we incorporate time-resolved circular polarization of luminescence, an additional independent observable, into the analysis. In the simplest case, for example, each lumiphore's chirality is assumed to be time independent and is determined by the position of the lumiphore with respect to the surrounding chiral environment within the protein. In this paper, we describe the analysis of simultaneously recorded time-resolved luminescence and circularly polarized luminescence data to obtain improved temporal resolution. When combined with selective dynamic luminescence quenching, in a model system comprising a mixture of Tb/transferrin and Tb/conalbumin, we demonstrate resolution between two decay components with a lifetime difference of 7% and a difference in emission anisotropy of 5 X 10(-2). Evidence for the improved discrimination is further demonstrated by the increase in curvature of the chi 2 surface that results from the additional information. Abstract | PDF (445 kb)

• …more

Abstract

The concept of photosynthetic unit (PSU) is reviewed in the light of the authors' results in the fields of fluorescence and luminescence (delayed light). Models of PSU are mainly distinguished by the amount of exciton exchange which is allowed between units. The “separate” model, with its “first-order” character, is not consistent with fluorescence kinetic data. The sigmoidal rise of fluorescence under actinic light is best explained by “nonseparate” models; however, most of these models assume a delocalization of excitons or centers. The “connected” model introduced here is not subject to this criticism. It discloses a new effect (the “îlot” effect): a nonrandom grouping of fluorescent units the consequences of which are discussed. It is noted that a “two-quantum” model for the photochemical reaction gives results very similar to those of the connected model. A relation between luminescence intensity and fluorescence yield is seen as a necessary consequence of the PSU concept. Its meaning is different in separate and nonseparate models. This relation is discussed in connection with the true system II fluorescence emission.