help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on July 28, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.082586
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.082586v1
91/9/3405    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Streiff, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Streiff, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K. A.
Biophysical Journal 91:3405-3414 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Prediction of Volatile Anesthetic Binding Sites in Proteins

John H. Streiff *, Thomas W. Allen {dagger}, Elena Atanasova {dagger}, Nenad Juranic {ddagger}, Slobodan Macura {ddagger}, Alan R. Penheiter * and Keith A. Jones *

Departments of * Anesthesiology and {dagger} Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and {ddagger} Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to J. H. Streiff, Tel.: 507-284-1342; E-mail: streiff.john{at}mayo.edu.

Computational methods designed to predict and visualize ligand protein binding interactions were used to characterize volatile anesthetic (VA) binding sites and unoccupied pockets within the known structures of VAs bound to serum albumin, luciferase, and apoferritin. We found that both the number of protein atoms and methyl hydrogen, which are within ~8 Å of a potential ligand binding site, are significantly greater in protein pockets where VAs bind. This computational approach was applied to structures of calmodulin (CaM), which have not been determined in complex with a VA. It predicted that VAs bind to [Ca2+]4-CaM, but not to apo-CaM, which we confirmed with isothermal titration calorimetry. The VA binding sites predicted for the structures of [Ca2+]4-CaM are located in hydrophobic pockets that form when the Ca2+ binding sites in CaM are saturated. The binding of VAs to these hydrophobic pockets is supported by evidence that halothane predominantly makes contact with aliphatic resonances in [Ca2+]4-CaM (nuclear Overhauser effect) and increases the Ca2+ affinity of CaM (fluorescence spectroscopy). Our computational analysis and experiments indicate that binding of VA to proteins is consistent with the hydrophobic effect and the Meyer-Overton rule.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. B. Kelz and R. G. Eckenhoff
Does It Add Up?
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 365 - 366.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.