help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on September 15, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.092668
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.092668v1
92/1/208    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, S.
Right arrow Articles by Surolia, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, S.
Right arrow Articles by Surolia, A.
Biophysical Journal 92:208-216 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

Attributes of Glycosylation in the Establishment of the Unfolding Pathway of Soybean Agglutinin

Sharmistha Sinha * and Avadhesha Surolia * {dagger}

* Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India; and {dagger} National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Avadhesha Surolia, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi-110067, India. Tel.: 91-11-2671-7102; Fax: 91-11-2616-2125; E-mail: surolia{at}nii.res.in.

Soybean agglutinin (gSBA) is a tetrameric legume lectin, each of whose subunits are glycosylated. Earlier studies have shown that this protein shows exceptionally high stability in terms of free energy of unfolding when compared to other proteins from the same family. This article deals with the unfolding reactions of the nonglycosylated recombinant form of the protein rSBA and its comparison with the glycosylated counterpart gSBA. The nonglycosylated form features a lower stability when compared to the glycosylated form. Further, the unfolding pathways in the two are widely different. Although the glycosylated form undergoes a simple two-state unfolding, the nonglycosylated species unfolds via a compact monomeric intermediate that is not a molten globule. Representative isothermal and thermal denaturation profiles show that glycosylation accounts for a stabilization of ~9 kcal/mol of the tetramer, whereas the difference in Tm between the two forms is 26°C. Computational studies on the glycan-protein interactions at the noncanonical interface of the protein show that quite a number of hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions stabilize the glycoprotein tetramer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Shental-Bechor and Y. Levy
Effect of glycosylation on protein folding: A close look at thermodynamic stabilization
PNAS, June 17, 2008; 105(24): 8256 - 8261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.