help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on October 20, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.091934
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.091934v1
92/1/46    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Voth, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Voth, G. A.
Biophysical Journal 92:46-60 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

Charge Delocalization in Proton Channels, I: The Aquaporin Channels and Proton Blockage

Hanning Chen *, Boaz Ilan *, Yujie Wu *, Fangqiang Zhu {dagger}, Klaus Schulten {dagger} and Gregory A. Voth *

* Center for Biophysical Modeling and Simulation, Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and {dagger} Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Gregory A. Voth, Tel.: 801-581-7272; E-mail: voth{at}chem.utah.edu.

The explicit contribution to the free energy barrier and proton conductance from the delocalized nature of the excess proton is examined in aquaporin channels using an accurate all-atom molecular dynamics computer simulation model. In particular, the channel permeation free energy profiles are calculated and compared for both a delocalized (fully Grotthuss shuttling) proton and a classical (nonshuttling) hydronium ion along two aquaporin channels, Aqp1 and GlpF. To elucidate the effects of the bipolar field thought to arise from two {alpha}-helical macrodipoles on proton blockage, free energy profiles were also calculated for computational mutants of the two channels where the bipolar field was eliminated by artificially discharging the backbone atoms. Comparison of the free energy profiles between the proton and hydronium cases indicates that the magnitude of the free energy barrier and position of the barrier peak for the fully delocalized and shuttling proton are somewhat different from the case of the (localized) classical hydronium. The proton conductance through the two aquaporin channels is also estimated using Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory for both the Grotthuss shuttling excess proton and the classical hydronium cation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
R. Roth, D. Gillespie, W. Nonner, and R. E. Eisenberg
Bubbles, Gating, and Anesthetics in Ion Channels
Biophys. J., June 1, 2008; 94(11): 4282 - 4298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. Chen, Y. Wu, and G. A. Voth
Proton Transport Behavior through the Influenza A M2 Channel: Insights from Molecular Simulation
Biophys. J., November 15, 2007; 93(10): 3470 - 3479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.