help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on February 15, 2008.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.113415
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.113415v1
94/11/4202    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fulle, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gohlke, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fulle, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gohlke, H.
Biophysical Journal 94:4202-4219 (2008)
© 2008 The Biophysical Society

Analyzing the Flexibility of RNA Structures by Constraint Counting

Simone Fulle and Holger Gohlke

Department of Biological Sciences, Molecular Bioinformatics Group, J. W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Holger Gohlke, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany. Tel.: 49-69-798-29411; Fax: 49-69-798-29527; E-mail: gohlke{at}bioinformatik.uni-frankfurt.de.

RNA requires conformational dynamics to undergo its diverse functional roles. Here, a new topological network representation of RNA structures is presented that allows analyzing RNA flexibility/rigidity based on constraint counting. The method extends the FIRST approach, which identifies flexible and rigid regions in atomic detail in a single, static, three-dimensional molecular framework. Initially, the network rigidity of a canonical A-form RNA is analyzed by counting on constraints of network elements of increasing size. These considerations demonstrate that it is the inclusion of hydrophobic contacts into the RNA topological network that is crucial for an accurate flexibility prediction. The counting also explains why a protein-based parameterization results in overly rigid RNA structures. The new network representation is then validated on a tRNAASP structure and all NMR-derived ensembles of RNA structures currently available in the Protein Data Bank (with chain length ≥40). The flexibility predictions demonstrate good agreement with experimental mobility data, and the results are superior compared to predictions based on two previously used network representations. Encouragingly, this holds for flexibility predictions as well as mobility predictions obtained by constrained geometric simulations on these networks. Potential applications of the approach to analyzing the flexibility of DNA and RNA/protein complexes are discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.