| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROTEINS |
1 Georgia Institute of Technology
2 Georgia Tech
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: skolnick{at}gatech.edu.
Submitted on January 18, 2008
Revised on February 14, 2008
Accepted on 18 April 2008
| Abstract |
|---|
200 residues that cover the PDB at 35% pairwise sequence identity. Compared with the average fraction of accurately predicted side chain contacts of 0.37 using PROSPECTOR_3.5 with wild type template sequences, the average accuracy of the composite-sequence method increases to 0.60. The resulting TASSER_2.0 models are closer to their native structures, with an average RMSD of 4.99 Å compared to the 5.31 Å result of TASSER. Defining a successful prediction as a model with a RMSD to native <6.5 Å, the success rate of TASSER_2.0 (TASSER) for Medium targets (targets with good templates/poor alignments) is 74.3% (64.7%) and 40.8% (35.5%) for the Hard targets (incorrect templates/alignments). For Easy targets (good templates/alignments), the success rate slightly increases from 86.3% to 88.4%.
Key Words: Protein structure prediction, TASSER, TASSER_2.0, Threading, composite-sequence method, side chain contact prediction
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |