help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published June 20, 2008. doi:10.1529/biophysj.108.134874
© 2008 by the Biophysical Society.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonsson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hook, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonsson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hook, F.

SPECTROSCOPY, IMAGING, OTHER TECHNIQUES

A method improving the accuracy of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis

Peter Jonsson 1, Magnus P Jonsson 1, Jonas O Tegenfeldt 1 and Fredrik Hook 2*

1 Lund University
2 Chalmers University of Technology

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fredrik.hook{at}chalmers.se.

Submitted on April 6, 2008
Revised on May 15, 2008
Accepted on 29 May 2008


   Abstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, FRAP, has been an established technique of quantifying the mobility of molecular species in cells and cell membranes for more than 30 years. However, under non-ideal experimental conditions the current methods of analysis still suffer from occasional problems, for example, when the signal to noise ratio is low, when there are temporal fluctuations in the illumination or when there is bleaching during the recovery process. We here present a method of analysis that overcomes these problems, yielding accurate results even under non-ideal experimental conditions. The method is based on circular averaging of each image, followed by spatial frequency analysis of the averaged radial data, and requires no prior knowledge of the shape of the bleached area. The method was validated using both simulated and experimental FRAP data, illustrating that the diffusion coefficient of a single diffusing component can be determined to within ~1 %, even for small signal levels (100 photon counts), and that at typical signal levels (5000 photon counts) a system with two diffusion coefficients can be analyzed with less than 10 % error.

Key Words: FRAP, diffusion, lipid vesicle, multiple diffusion coefficients, spatial frequency analysis, supported lipid bilayer







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.