| A Model of the Quaternary Structure of the Escherichia coli F1 ATPase from X-Ray Solution Scattering and Evidence for Structural Changes in the Delta Subunit during ATP Hydrolysis Biophysical Journal, Volume 75, Issue 5, 1 November 1998, Pages 2212-2219 Dmitri I. Svergun, Ingo Aldag, Tanja Sieck, Karlheinz Altendorf, Michel H.J. Koch, David J. Kane, Michael B. Kozin and Gerhard Grüber Abstract The shape and subunit arrangement of the F ATPase (F ATPase) was investigated by synchrotron radiation x-ray solution scattering. The radius of gyration and the maximum dimension of the enzyme complex are 4.61±0.03nm and 15.5±0.05nm, respectively. The shape of the complex was determined ab initio from the scattering data at a resolution of 3nm, which allowed unequivocal identification of the volume occupied by the subassembly and further positioning of the atomic models of the smaller subunits. The subunit was positioned near the bottom of the hexamer in a location consistent with a – disulfide formation in the mutant F ATPase, Y331W:Y381C:ϵS108C, when MgADP is bound to the enzyme. The position and orientation of the ϵ subunit were found by interactively fitting the solution scattering data to maintain connection of the two-helix hairpin with the complex and binding of the -sandwich domain to the subunit. Nucleotide-dependent changes of the subunit were investigated by stopped-flow fluorescence technique at 12°C using -[4-[7-(dimethylamino)-4-methyl]coumarin-3-yl]maleimide (CM) as a label. Fluorescence quenching monitored after addition of MgATP was rapid [=6.6s] and then remained constant. Binding of MgADP and the noncleavable nucleotide analog AMP · PNP caused an initial fluorescent quenching followed by a slower decay back to the original level. This suggests that the subunit undergoes conformational changes and/or rearrangements in the F ATPase during ATP hydrolysis. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (323 kb) |
| Quaternary Structure Built from Subunits Combining NMR and Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Data Biophysical Journal, Volume 83, Issue 2, 1 August 2002, Pages 1177-1183 Maija-Liisa Mattinen, Kimmo Pääkkönen, Teemu Ikonen, Jeremy Craven, Torbjörn Drakenberg, Ritva Serimaa, Jonathan Waltho and Arto Annila Abstract A new principle in constructing molecular complexes from the known high-resolution domain structures joining data from NMR and small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements is described. Structure of calmodulin in complex with trifluoperazine was built from N- and C-terminal domains oriented based on residual dipolar couplings measured by NMR in a dilute liquid crystal, and the overall shape of the complex was derived from SAXS data. The residual dipolar coupling data serves to reduce angular degrees of freedom, and the small-angle scattering data serves to confine the translational degrees of freedom. The complex built by this method was found to be consistent with the known crystal structure. The study demonstrates how approximate tertiary structures of modular proteins or quaternary structures composed of subunits can be assembled from high-resolution structures of domains or subunits using mutually complementary NMR and SAXS data. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (485 kb) |
| 19Å Solution Structure of the Filarial Nematode Immunomodulatory Protein, ES-62 Biophysical Journal, Volume 84, Issue 1, 1 January 2003, Pages 489-500 Claire J. Ackerman, Margaret M. Harnett, William Harnett, Sharon M. Kelly, Dmitri I. Svergun and Olwyn Byron Abstract ES-62, a protein secreted by filarial nematodes, parasites of vertebrates including humans, has an unusual posttranslational covalent addition of phosphorylcholine to an N-type glycan. Studies on ES-62 from the rodent parasite ascribe it a dominant role in ensuring parasite survival by modulating the host immune system. Understanding this immunomodulation at the molecular level awaits full elucidation but distinct components of ES-62 may participate: the protein contributes aminopeptidase-like activity whereas the phosphorylcholine is thought to act as a signal transducer. We have used biophysical and bioinformatics-based structure prediction methods to define a low-resolution model of ES-62. Sedimentation equilibrium showed that ES-62 is a tightly bound tetramer. The sedimentation coefficient is consistent with this oligomer and the overall molecular shape revealed by small angle x-ray scattering. A 19Å model for ES-62 was restored from the small-angle x-ray scattering data using the program DAMMIN which uses simulated annealing to find a configuration of densely packed scattering elements consistent with the experimental scattering curve. Analysis of the primary sequence with the position-specific iterated basic local alignment search tool, PSI-BLAST, identified six closely homologous proteins, five of which are peptidases, consistent with observed aminopeptidase activity in ES-62. Differences between the secondary structure content of ES-62 predicted using the consensus output from the secondary structure prediction server JPRED and measured using circular dichroism are discussed in relation to multimeric glycosylated proteins. This study represents the first attempt to understand the multifunctional properties of this important parasite-derived molecule by studying its structure. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (561 kb) |
Copyright © 1999 The Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.
Biophysical Journal, Volume 76, Issue 6, 2879-2886, 1 June 1999
doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77443-6
Biophysical Theory and Modeling
Address reprint requests to D. I. Svergun, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-40-89902-125; Fax: 49-40-89902-149.The fundamental aim of structural studies in molecular biology is to establish a relationship between the structure (or, more precisely, structural changes) and function of biological macromolecules. Over the past years, a tremendous amount of structural information has been obtained using macromolecular crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). These high-resolution methods apply only in rather specific conditions: it is often difficult to grow crystals of high molecular weight (MW) assemblies that are suitable for diffraction, and the application of NMR is fundamentally limited to small (MW<30 kd) proteins. As most cellular functions are performed by macromolecular complexes, the structure of which depends on their environment, alternative ways of obtaining information on structures and the factors governing their often subtle changes must be explored.
X-ray and neutron small angle scattering (SAS) in solution can yield low-resolution information only (from ∼1–100nm) but are applicable in a broad range of conditions and particle sizes (Feigin and Svergun, 1987). SAS permits analysis of biological macromolecules and their complexes in nearly physiological environments and direct study of structural responses to changes in external conditions.
Scattering intensity from a dilute monodisperse solution of macromolecules (e.g., of purified proteins) is proportional to the spherically averaged single-particle scattering I(s)=〈A2(s)〉Ω, where s= (s, Ω) is the scattering vector, s=(4π/λ)sin θ, λ the wavelength, and 2θ the scattering angle. The sampling theorem (Shannon and Weaver, 1949,Moore, 1980,Taupin and Luzzati, 1982) estimates the number of degrees of freedom associated with I(s) on an interval smin<s<smax as Ns=Dmax (smax−smin)/π, where Dmax is the maximum particle diameter. As the SAS curves decay rapidly with s they are reliably registered only at low resolution and, in practice, Ns does not exceed 10–15. Based on this estimate, SAS is commonly considered to be not only a low-resolution but also a low-information technique.
Additional information about the particle structure is provided by contrast variation (Stuhrmann and Kirste, 1965). The contrast of a particle or its component with a scattering density distribution ρ(r) in a solvent of density ρs is the average effective density Δρ=〈ρ(r)〉−ρs. For single-component macromolecules (e.g., proteins), measurements at different ρs allow extraction of the scattering due to the particle shape. For particles consisting of distinct components with different scattering length densities (e.g., lipoprotein or nucleoprotein complexes), contributions from the components can be extracted, allowing analysis of their individual structures and mutual positions. Neutron contrast variation studies employing isotopic H/D exchange are especially effective due to a remarkable difference in the scattering length of H and D atoms (Koch and Stuhrmann, 1979,Capel et al).
Only a few particle parameters (radius of gyration Rg, volume, Dmax) are directly evaluated from the SAS data. A common way of further analysis by trial-and-error modeling requires a priori information and can by no means guarantee uniqueness. The degree of uncertainty is reduced when the structure of individual domains is available; this also permits construction of biologically meaningful models (Krueger et al,Ashton et al,Svergun et al). An ab initio approach for restoration of low-resolution envelopes (Stuhrmann, 1970a,Svergun and Stuhrmann, 1991,Svergun et al) has been applied to shape determination of proteins (Svergun et al) and contrast variation analysis of ribosomes (Svergun, 1994,Svergun et al). An interesting procedure for ab initio shape determination has recently been developed by Chacón et al using a genetic algorithm to produce models described by densely packed beads. The present paper introduces a general method for ab initio low-resolution shape and internal structure retrieval and presents its application to a model system and to real objects.
First, a general model of a K-phase particle (K≥1) is constructed and its scattering is calculated. A volume is defined which encloses the particle (e.g., a sphere of sufficiently large radius R) and filled with N dummy atoms (e.g., closely packed spheres of radius r0 ≪ R; see example of such packing in Fig. 1, middle row). Each dummy atom is assigned an index Xj indicating the phase to which it belongs (Xj ranges from 0 (solvent) to K). Given the fixed atomic positions, the shape and structure of the dummy atom model (DAM) are completely described by a phase assignment (configuration) vector X with N ≈ (R/r0)3 components.
Assuming that the dummy atoms of the kth phase have contrast Δρk, the scattering intensity from the DAM is
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
Given a set of M≥1 contrast variation curves Iexp(i)(s), i=1, … M, it is natural to search for a configuration X minimizing the discrepancy
![]() | (5) |
For an adequate description of a structure the number of dummy atoms must, however, be large (N ≈ 103). Even if the data are neatly fitted, uniqueness of such a model cannot be meaningfully discussed.
Let us require the model to have low resolution with respect to r0. Qualitatively this means that the volumes occupied by the phases are not expected to contain only a single dummy atom or a few atoms, nor can the interfacial area be too detailed. For a quantitative estimate, a list of contacts (i.e., atoms at an offset <2r0) is defined for each dummy atom. The number of contacts for hexagonal packing is Nc=12 (or less for the atoms close to the DAM border). An individual connectivity of a nonsolvent atom is characterized by counting among its contacts the number of atoms Ne belonging to the same phase. An exponential form C(Ne)=1−P(Ne)=1 – [exp(−0.5Ne)−exp(−0.5Nc)] can be taken to emphasize loosely connected dummy atoms. This function slowly decays from C(12)=1 (ideal connectivity) to C(6)=0.943 (half the contacts may indicate, e.g., the particle border), followed by a steep decrease for looser atoms toward C(0)=0.002 (for a dummy isolated atom, which should never appear). The compactness of a given configuration X can be computed as an average connectivity of all nonsolvent atoms 〈C(Ne)〉. In the following, a configuration will be characterized by the average looseness P(X)=1−〈C(Ne)〉. This value depends mostly on the connectivity of the individual atoms, but also on the anisometry of the particle represented by the nonsolvent atoms. For example, at K=1 and N ≈ 2000, P ≈ 0.007 for a solid sphere, 0.012 for a prolate ellipsoid of rotation with an axial ratio 1:10. Filling the two volumes randomly with phase 0 (solvent) and phase 1 (particle) atoms yields P ≈ 0.1 in both cases.
The task of retrieving a low-resolution model from the scattering data can be formulated as follows: given a DAM, find a configuration X minimizing a goal function f(X)=χ2+αP(X), where α>0 is the weight of the looseness penalty. As usual when using penalties, the weight has to be selected in such a way that the second term yields a significant (say ∼10–50%) contribution to the function at the end of the minimization. Because χ2 is expected to be around 1 for a correct solution and P(X) is of order of 10−2 for compact bodies, α ≈ 101 is a reasonable choice.
Given the large number of variables and the combinatorial nature of the problem, simulated annealing (SA) (Kirkpatrick et al) seems to be an appropriate global minimization method. The main idea in this method is to perform random modifications of the system (i.e., of the vector X) while moving always to the configurations that decrease energy f(X), but sometimes also to those that increase f(X). The probability of accepting the latter moves decreases in the course of the minimization (the system is cooled). At the beginning, the temperature is high and the changes almost random, whereas at the end a configuration with nearly minimum energy is reached. The algorithm was implemented in its faster simulated quenching (Press et al,Ingber, 1993) version:
Only one dummy atom is changed per move so that only a single summand in Eq. (4) must be updated to calculate the partial amplitudes. As the latter is the most time-consuming operation, this accelerates the evaluation of f(X) about N times. This acceleration makes it possible to use the SA, which is very robust (Ingber, 1993) but would otherwise be prohibitively slow, as millions of function evaluations are required for a typical refinement.
The synchrotron radiation x-ray scattering data from enolpyryvul transferase, elongation factor Tu, thioredoxin reductase, and reverse transcriptase were collected following standard procedures using the X33 camera (Koch and Bordas, 1983; Boulin et al,Boulin et al) of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory at Deutsches Elektronen Syncrotron (Hamburg) and multiwire proportional chambers with delay line readout (Gabriel and Dauvergne, 1982). Details of the experimental procedures are given elsewhere (Schönbrunn et al,Bilgin et al,Svergun et al,Svergun et al). The data processing (normalization, buffer subtraction, etc.) involved statistical error propagation using the program SAPOKO (Svergun and Koch, unpublished data). The maximum diameters were estimated from the experimental data using the orthogonal expansion program ORTOGNOM (Svergun, 1993).
The method was first tested on simulated data from a model two-phase object in Fig. 1. The outer envelope was taken from the electron microscopic model of the 30S Escherichia coli ribosomal subunit (Frank et al). Phase 1 is represented by four bodies inside the envelope (a triaxial ellipsoid and several ribosomal proteins, see Table 1), phase 2 by the remaining volume. The curves in Fig. 2 were calculated in a typical experimental interval 0.06<s<1.5nm−1 (a resolution of 2π/smax=4.1nm). The contrasts of the two phases were taken to correspond to those of protein and RNA, respectively, in a neutron experiment. Curve 1 corresponds to infinite contrast (Δρ1= Δρ2, deuterated particle in H2O), curves 2–5 to a protonated particle in solvents with D2O concentrations of 0%, 40% (protein matched out), 70% (RNA matched out), and 100%. Only three of these five curves are independent, the redundancy being required, as in real experiments, to account for random errors simulated here (3% relative noise was added to the intensities).
| Table 1 Envelopes comprising the two-phase model |
| Model body, Protein Data Bank entry | Volume (nm3) | Rg (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Outer envelope | 1232 | 6.29 | ||
| 2.Ellipsoid 3.1×4.4×5.0nm | 286 | 3.28 | ||
| 3.Dimer of protein S8, 1sei (Davies et al) | 43 | 2.59 | ||
| 4.Protein S5, 1pkp (Ramakrishnan and White, 1992) | 20 | 1.53 | ||
| 5.Protein S15, lab3 (Berglund et al) | 15 | 1.45 | ||
| The envelopes of the ribosomal proteins were computed from their atomic coordinates in the Protein Data Bank (PDB, Bernstein et al) using the CRYSOL program (Svergun et al). |
Model calculations below were performed with the correctly scaled data sets (absolute scale) and with those multiplied by arbitrary factors (relative scale, by fitting only geometry of the curves) led to similar final models. Series 2–3 over spherical harmonics were truncated at l=14 and the atomic scattering f(s)=1 was taken (it can be shown that a constant form factor, not that of a sphere with radius r0, ensures adequate computation of the partial amplitudes). The simulated and experimental curves were always neatly fitted (χ2≈1) and the final looseness was around P(X)≈0.02.
At infinite contrast, the object is a single phase particle and ab initio shape determination can be done against curve 1 (K=M=1). A sphere of radius R≈Dmax/2=11nm was filled by dummy atoms with r0=0.8nm (N=1925). Annealing yields stable results for different starting points and the restored configurations (a typical one is presented in Figure 1B) match the theoretical envelope well. The shape is, of course, recovered in an arbitrary orientation and handedness, the enantiomorph yielding the same scattering curve.
The envelope of the DAM in Figure 1C was computed, radially expanded by 0.5nm to enclose 1.25 times the volume of the model particle and filled with N=2098 dummy atoms at r0=0.5nm. The two-phase refinement performed against all five scattering curves yields nearly perfect restoration of the overall shape. The reconstruction of the inner structure is illustrated in Figure 1C displaying the atoms assigned to phase 1 for three independent runs. The shape and location of the largest ellipsoidal particle are well recovered, whereas the uncertainty in the representation of the smaller bodies is relatively large. This is not surprising given that these smaller bodies occupy only a few percent of the model volume and their radii of gyration are smaller than the resolution of the data (Table 1). It is rather surprising that the method is sensitive to their presence: the solutions for all runs (more than a dozen) displayed atoms of phase 1 in the volume around the correct positions of the small particles. As can be seen from Figure 1C, averaging the results of independent runs provides a way to further refine the solution and to estimate its uncertainty.
Is it possible to use the method if no contrast variation data are available, e.g., for shape determination of proteins from x-ray scattering? For proteins with MW>30 kd, the shape scattering dominates the inner part of the x-ray curve. Scattering from the internal structure is nearly a constant that can be subtracted from the data to ensure that the intensity decays as s−4 at higher angles, following Porod, 1982 law. Figure 3A-D and Table 2 illustrate ab initio shape restoration from the experimental data of several proteins with known atomic resolution crystal structures. The synchrotron radiation scattering curves (Fig. 4) were recorded as part of ongoing projects at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hamburg Outstation (see Materials and Methods). The data on a relative scale were used and the diameters of the search spheres Dmax were determined from the individual experimental curves. The value of r0 was selected to have N ≈ 1500 atoms, and the results obtained were stable to the starting configuration. Comparison with the appropriately rotated atomic models indicates that the low-resolution structure is well restored.
| Table 2 Proteins recovered and their parameters |
| Protein, Protein Data Bank entry | MW kd | Dmax nm | smax nm−1 | Ns | r0 nm | N | N1* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.Enolpyruvyl transferase | 45 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 5.3 | 0.30 | 1442 | 524 | ||
| 1uae (Skarzynski et al) | |||||||||
| B.Elongation factor Tu | 45 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 4.8 | 0.30 | 1763 | 545 | ||
| 1eft (Kjeldgaard et al) | |||||||||
| C.Thioredoxin reductase | 68 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 0.45 | 1341 | 267 | ||
| 1tde (Waksman et al) | |||||||||
| D.Reverse transcriptase | 105 | 12.5 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 0.50 | 1483 | 313 | ||
| 3hvt (Wang et al) | |||||||||
| * N1 denotes the number of dummy atoms of phase 1 in the final model. |
The volumes occupied by the final DAMs are in all cases larger than the dry volumes of the proteins computed from their MWs. This apparent swelling is due to the higher density of the bound water in the hydration shell (Ashton et al,Svergun et al).
How can the predictions of the sampling theorem be reconciled with the restoration of the models described by N ≫ Ns atoms? First, Ns alone does not define the degrees of freedom for a data set. Redundancy of the experimental data measured with an angular step much smaller than the width of the Shannon’s channel (Δs=π/Dmax) increases the information content; this is successfully used for superresolution in optical image reconstruction (Frieden, 1971). The effective number of degrees of freedom was shown to range from zero at the signal-to-noise ratio of 1 to 15Ns at signal-to-noise ratio of 103 (Frieden, 1971). This should not be taken as a proof that one is entitled to build models described by 15Ns independent parameters, but rather as an indication that the number of degrees of freedom strongly depends on data accuracy. For SAS, it was demonstrated by Svergun et al that a unique determination of particle envelope is also achieved with a number of model parameters up to 1.5Ns. Second, the number of independent parameters in a DAM is much lower than N due to the looseness penalty. At later annealing stages the program searches for a compact solution with the smallest interfacial area, whereas the fit acts as a constraint (the penalty, rather than χ2, is decreased). The more information provided by the data, the more stringent is the constraint, i.e., the more detail should be kept by the DAM. Among the proteins presented, the most detail is obtained for that with the largest MW and the largest Ns value (Figure 3D and Table 2).
For single-phase particles (K=1), the shape representation using DAM is equivalent to that employed in the bead modeling of Chacón et al. The ab initio shape determination from a single scattering curve (K=M=1) is the least favorable case from the informational point of view, as the cross-terms are missing in Eq. (3). Svergun et al demonstrated that bodies sharing similar gross features but differing in finer details may produce nearly identical scattering curves in a given interval. A unique solution can then be obtained only by restricting the resolution of the model. In the method of Svergun et al,Svergun et al this was done by representing the particle envelope with limited number of spherical harmonics. Chacón et al did not use an explicit compactness criterion; instead, the genetic algorithm procedure started from a relatively large bead radius r0 and several cycles with decreasing r0 were performed. Although the effective resolution of the model was lowered by the reduction of the search volume after each cycle, noticeable portions of loosely connected beads could be seen in the final models.
In the model calculations performed, and also for the examples in Figure 3 and Figure 4, the SA procedure yielded very similar compact solutions for different starting approximations (again, up to an arbitrary rotation, shift, and handedness). The weight of the looseness penalty may be changed by a factor of up to five without distorting the low-resolution features of the solution, and comparison of several independent runs can be used to estimate the uncertainty. One should stress, however, that the ab initio shape determination must be used with caution, especially if the scattering from the internal inhomogeneities is not negligible. In particular, it would not be justified to expect a detailed shape restoration when using x-ray scattering curves from low MW proteins presented in Fig. 3. Further analysis of the uniqueness of the shape restoration using the SA procedure, including the influence of the systematic errors and comparison with other methods, are in progress. Test calculations made on several other proteins with known atomic structure yielded good ab initio restorations of their low-resolution structure similar to those presented in Fig. 3. It is thus tempting to say that the looseness penalty forces the method to select the level of detail required for uniqueness.
On a 180-MHz SGI workstation with an R10,000 processor, single-phase DAM refinement against one curve takes ∼5–6h of CPU time. For the two-phase system, typical times were longer (40–50h). These times correspond to the annealing conditions listed above; practice will show to what extent the number of function evaluations can be reduced without affecting the convergence. In particular, it was found that reconfigurations of 50–70N are sufficient to equilibrate the system at each temperature, which halves the CPU power required. For a single-phase DAM, significant acceleration can be achieved by reducing the search volume at a later annealing stage, when the particle shape is already well defined. Clearly the method could gain considerably from parallel implementation. Global minimization techniques that are claimed to be faster, e.g., taboo search (Glover, 1989), will also be tested.
Further applications of the method include, first, the analysis of the internal structure of multi-component macromolecular complexes, which in many cases is facilitated by using electron microscopic models of the overall shape. In particular, in studies on ribosome, where single crystals have long been available, little information has been reported so far about the mutual distribution of ribosomal components despite remarkable recent progress in x-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy (Ban et al). The main reason for this is the small contrast between ribosomal proteins and RNA in these studies, and the most detailed results are still those obtained by neutron scattering using triangulation of individual proteins in the ribosomal subunits (Capel et al,May et al). The method presented is being used to construct the map of the protein-RNA distribution in the E. coli ribosome based on the earlier neutron scattering data from selectively deuterated particles (Svergun et al). Second, ab initio retrieval of the quaternary structure of macromolecules in terms of low-resolution particle shape could, albeit with some caveats, also be done without contrast variation, using x-ray scattering data only. The executable codes of the shape determination program for IBM-PC and major UNIX platforms are available from the author upon request.
The author is indebted to M. H. J. Koch for helpful discussions and encouraging criticism and to M. B. Kozin for assistance with computer graphics. I thank E. Schönbrunn, N. Bilgin, S. Kuprin, and L. Goobar-Larsson for providing the experimental scattering data. The work was supported by European Union grant BIO4-CT97–2143.
Ashton et al., 1997 (1997). Pentameric and decameric structures in solution of serum amyloid P component by X-ray and neutron scattering and molecular modelling analyses. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 408–422. CrossRef | PubMed
Ban et al., 1998 (1998). A 9Å resolution X-ray crystallographic map of the large ribosomal subunit. Cell 93, 1105–1115. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (726 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
Berglund et al., 1997 (1997). Solution structure of the ribosomal RNA binding protein S15 from Th. thermophilus. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 20–21. CrossRef | PubMed
Bilgin et al., 1998 (1998). Solution structure of the ternary complex between aminoacyl-tRNA, elongation factor Tu, and guanosine triphosphate. Biochemistry 37, 8163–8172. PubMed
Bernstein et al., 1977 (1977). The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542. CrossRef | PubMed
Boulin et al., 1986 (1986). Data appraisal, evaluation and display for synchrotron radiation experiments: hardware and software. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A249, 399–407. PubMed
Boulin et al., 1988 (1988). Data acquisition systems for linear and area X-ray detectors using delay line readout. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A269, 312–320. PubMed
Capel et al., 1987 (1987). A complete mapping of the proteins in the small ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli. Science 238, 1403–1406. PubMed
Chacón et al., 1998 (1998). Low-resolution structures of proteins in solution retrieved from X-ray scattering with a genetic algorithm. Biophys. J. 74, 2760–2775. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (2176 kb) | PubMed
Davies et al., 1996 (1996). The crystal structure of ribosomal protein S8: implications for modelling the central domain of 16A rRNA. Structure 4, 1093–1104. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (2133 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
Feigin and Svergun, 1987 (1987). Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-Ray and Neutron Scattering. (New York: Plenum Press). PubMed
Frank et al., 1995 (1995). A model of protein synthesis based on a new cryo-electron microscopy reconstruction of the E. coli ribosome. Nature 376, 441–444. CrossRef | PubMed
Frieden, 1971 (1971). Evaluation, design and extrapolation methods for optical signals, based on the use of the prolate functions. In Wolf, E., ed. Progress in Optics 9, (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 312–407. PubMed
Gabriel and Dauvergne, 1982 (1982). The localization method used at EMBL. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 201, 223–224. PubMed
Glover, 1989 (1989). Tabu Search–Part I. ORSA J. Comput. 1, 190–206. PubMed
Ingber, 1993 (1993). Simulated annealing: practice versus theory. Math. Computer Modelling 18, 29–57. PubMed
Kirkpatrick et al., 1983 (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680. PubMed
Kjeldgaard et al., 1993 (1993). The crystal structure of elongation factor EF-Tu from Thermus aquaticus in the GTP conformation. Structure 1, 35–50. Abstract | | CrossRef | PubMed
Koch and Stuhrmann, 1979 (1979). Neutron scattering studies of ribosomes. Meth. Enzymol. 59, 670–706. PubMed
Kozin et al., 1997 (1997). ASSA: a program for three-dimensional rendering in solution scattering from biopolymers. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30, 811–815. PubMed
Krueger et al., 1997 (1997). Structures of calmodulin and a functional myosin light chain kinase in the activated complex: a neutron scattering study. Biochemistry 36, 6017–6023. PubMed
May et al., 1992 (1992). Inter-protein distances within the large subunit from Escherichia coli ribosomes. EMBO J. 11, 373–378. PubMed
Moore, 1980 (1980). Small-angle scattering. Information content and error analysis. J. Appl. Cryst 13, 168–175. PubMed
Porod, 1982 (1982). General theory. In Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering. Glatter, O., Kratky, O., eds. (London: Academic Press), pp. 17–51. PubMed
Press et al., 1992 (1992). Numerical Recipes. (Cambridge: University Press). PubMed
Ramakrishnan and White, 1992 (1992). The structure of ribosomal protein S5 reveals 2 sites of interaction with 16S RNA. Nature 358, 768–771. CrossRef | PubMed
Schönbrunn et al., 1998 (1998). Studies on the conformational changes in the bacterial cell wall biosynthetic enzyme UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyltransferase (MurA). Eur. J. Biochem. 253, 406–412. PubMed
Shannon and Weaver, 1949 (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press). PubMed
Skarzynski et al., 1996 (1996). Structure of UDP-n-Acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase, an enzyme essential for the synthesis of bacterial peptidoglycan, complexed with substrate UDP-n-Acetylglucosamine and the drug fosfomycin. Structure 4, 1465–1474. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (435 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
Stuhrmann, 1970a (1970). Ein neues Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Oberflächenform und der inneren Struktur von gelösten globulären Proteinen aus Röntgenkleinwinkelmessungen. Zeitschr. Physik. Chem. Neue Folge 72, 177–198. PubMed
Stuhrmann, 1970b (1970). Interpretation of small-angle scattering of dilute solutions and gases. A representation of the structures related to a one-particle scattering functions. Acta Crystallogr. A26, 297–306. PubMed
Stuhrmann and Kirste, 1965 (1965). Elimination der intrapartikulären Untergrundstreuung bei der Röntgenkleinwinkelstreuung am kompakten Teilchen (Proteinen). Zeitschr. Physik. Chem. Neue Folge 46, 247–250. PubMed
Svergun, 1993 (1993). A direct indirect method of small-angle scattering data treatment. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 258–267. PubMed
Svergun, 1994 (1994). Solution scattering from biopolymers: advanced contrast variation data analysis. Acta Crystallogr. A50, 391–402. PubMed
Svergun and Stuhrmann, 1991 (1991). New developments in direct shape determination from small-angle scattering. 1. Theory and model calculations. Acta Crystallogr. A47, 736–744. PubMed
Svergun et al., 1995 (1995). CRYSOL: a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 768–773. PubMed
Svergun et al., 1996 (1996). New developments in direct shape determination from small-angle scattering. 2. Uniqueness. Acta Crystallogr. A52, 419–426. PubMed
Svergun et al., 1997a (1997). Shape determination from solution scattering of biopolymers. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30, 798–802. PubMed
Svergun et al., 1997b (1997). Solution scattering structural analysis of the 70S Escherichia coli ribosome by contrast variation. J. Mol. Biol. 271, 588–601, 602–618.. CrossRef | PubMed
Svergun et al., 1998a (1998). A model of the quaternary structure of the Escherichia coli F1 ATPase from X-ray solution scattering and evidence for structural changes in the δ subunit during ATP hydrolysis. Biophys. J. 75, 2212–2219. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (323 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
Svergun et al., 1998b (1998). Protein hydration in solution: experimental observation by X-ray and neutron scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2267–2272. CrossRef | PubMed
Taupin and Luzzati, 1982 (1982). Informational content and retrieval in solution scattering studies. I. Degrees of freedom and data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 15, 289–300. PubMed
Waksman et al., 1994 (1994). Crystal structure of Escherichia coli thioredoxin reductase refined at 2 angstrom resolution: implications for a large conformational change during catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 800–816. CrossRef | PubMed
Wang et al., 1994 (1994). Structural basis of asymmetry in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase heterodimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7242–7245. CrossRef | PubMed