help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neher, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neher, E.

Biophys J, December 2000, p. 2783-2784, Vol. 79, No. 6

NEW AND NOTABLE
Calcium Buffers in Flash-Light

Erwin Neher

Department of Membrane Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany


    ARTICLE

Ca2+-binding proteins are dear to neuroanatomists because antibodies against them selectively stain specific subpopulations of neurons in the brain (Andressen et al., 1993). Thus, one might conclude that they have very specific functions, conferring distinct properties on the cell populations in which they are expressed. Unfortunately, it must be concluded, however, that we hardly understand what the staining pattern tells us, as the functional significance of Ca2+ binding proteins is only slowly emerging. Part of the reason for this ignorance is the fact that there is a not so trivial interplay between Ca2+ binding proteins, other cellular Ca2+ buffers, Ca2+ release, and Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms, not to mention the Ca2+ indicator dyes that are used to measure Ca2+ signals. To understand some aspects of this interaction we not only need to know the amounts and affinities of the Ca2+ chelators, but also their kinetic properties. The paper by Naegerl et al. (2000) in this issue represents a big step toward providing such basic information by measuring rate constants for Ca2+ binding and dissociation of one of the most abundant Ca2+-binding proteins, calbindin-D28k. This is achieved by analyzing the time course of binding of Ca2+ to the buffer after uncaging Ca2+ with a UV flash. The method should be readily applicable to other Ca2+-binding proteins and should be portable to in vivo experiments.

The action of fast Ca2+ buffers (the term Ca2+ buffer will be restricted here to proteins and other ligands binding Ca2+ and will not be used for other Ca2+ sequestration mechanisms) seems to be quite trivial---to bind Ca2+ rapidly and thereby lower its concentration. This, however, is true only transiently; for instance, after a short episode of Ca2+ influx. As time goes on, Ca2+ pumps will remove Ca2+ from the cytosol and from the buffers, establishing a steady state that is determined by a balance between Ca2+ fluxes across the boundaries surrounding the space occupied by cytosol. The presence of buffers inside will not influence that balance and, therefore, not change steady-state Ca2+ levels. Buffers will, however, lengthen the time required for the steady state to be achieved. In simple cases this lengthening will be by exactly the same factor by which the amplitude of the transient is reduced, such that the area under the transient (or the product of amplitude and time constant) will not be influenced by the presence of the buffer. The same will be true for the cumulative effect on any process that is linearly dependent on Ca2+ (Neher, 1998). This simple consideration gives a hint as to why it is so difficult to pinpoint the action of fast Ca2+ buffers: it resides mainly in deviations from linearity of the Ca2+-effector systems. In order to appreciate this, accurate numbers on affinities are required.

Another issue is kinetics. While a fast buffer will simply diminish the amplitude and slow down a Ca2+ transient (unless it becomes saturated), a slow buffer will affect the time course of the Ca2+ signal in a more complicated manner: a rapid decay phase, which represents binding of Ca2+ to the buffer, will be followed by a return to baseline, which is slower than what would occur in the absence of buffer (Markram et al., 1998). Complex time courses can result when Ca2+ binding to buffers and sequestration by pumps occur on the same time scale (Lee et al., 2000). Furthermore, saturation of Ca2+-binding proteins can lead to nonlinear summation of Ca2+ signals and to changes in the range of action of Ca2+ signals (Allbritton et al., 1992; Maeda et al., 1999). For all these reasons accurate numbers are required for simulating and interpreting the observed properties of the Ca2+ signal. Given the fact that any cell may contain several Ca2+ buffer species (including the indicator dyes) and multiple extrusion mechanisms, the number of model parameters in a simulation is large. Therefore, being able to fix any one of them by an independent measurement is a blessing.

Naegerl et al. work with droplets of "flashing solution," which is a mixture of salts, a caged Ca2+ compound (DM-Nitrophen), and a low-affinity Ca2+ indicator dye. They measure free Ca2+ in the focal spot of a confocal microscope (with the resting beam) and elicit transients in free Ca2+ by photolysing DM-Nitrophen with a flash of UV light. They analyze the decay of [Ca2+] in the presence of Ca2+ buffers (first EGTA to validate the method, then calbindin-D28k) to determine kinetic rates of Ca2+ binding. The method should be applicable to intracellular measurements in any cell type that can be loaded with Ca2+ indicator dyes and caged Ca2+. This should complement other methods in which intracellular buffers are titrated by continuous release of Ca2+ from caged Ca2+ or by multiple flashes (Xu et al., 1997; Maeda et al., 1999).

Naegerl et al. find that calbindin-D28k Ca2+-binding kinetics are best described by assuming two types of Ca2+-binding sites that differ in affinity and rate constants by factors of 2 to 6. The binding rate constants (~1 and 8 · 107 M-1 s-1 for the two sites, respectively) are surprisingly slow, the first one being comparable to that of EGTA (a typical "slow" buffer) and the second one being only 6-8 times faster. However, the value for EGTA obtained with this method (1.05 · 107 M-1 s-1) is somewhat fast compared to recent T-jump experiments under very similar conditions (Naraghi, 1997). Based on the comparison with EGTA, calbindin-D28k might be considered to be situated between fast and slow Ca2+ buffers. Its exact role in shaping the Ca2+ signal within a living cell will depend on its concentration and on influences exerted by other components of the intracellular milieu.

In cerebellar Purkinje cells, known to contain large amounts of calbindin-D28k, dendritic Ca2+ transients evoked by subthreshold parallel fiber stimulation were significantly affected when experiments were performed on calbindin-D28k-deficient (CB -/-) mice (Airaksinen et al., 1997). Peak amplitudes were clearly enhanced, demonstrating that binding of Ca2+ to calbindin-D28k was sufficiently fast to affect [Ca2+]i within the first 100 ms after the influx of Ca2+. Caged Ca2+ experiments on Purkinje cells have revealed a high concentration of a high-affinity Ca2+-binding protein with an affinity similar to the numbers reported here (Maeda et al., 1999). It was tentatively assigned to calbindin-D28k, but was reported to have cooperative Ca2+ binding, with an estimated Hill coefficient between 2 and 4. A complication in the analysis of these results arises from the fact that Purkinje cells not only express high levels of calbindin-D28k, but also equally high concentrations of the "slow" mobile buffer parvalbumin. It will be interesting to apply the method of Naegerl et al. to such cells and to see how calbindin-D28k injected into different types of neurones of CB-/-mice will affect Ca2+ transients.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank B. Schwaller, Fribourg, for helpful suggestions regarding the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication 13 October 2000 and in final form 13 October 2000.


    REFERENCES

Biophys J, December 2000, p. 2783-2784, Vol. 79, No. 6
© 2000 by the Biophysical Society   0006-3495/00/12/2783/02  $2.00



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
G. Dupont, A. Abou-Lovergne, and L. Combettes
Stochastic Aspects of Oscillatory Ca2+ Dynamics in Hepatocytes
Biophys. J., September 1, 2008; 95(5): 2193 - 2202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-W. Lin, Q. Fu, and T. Allana
Probing the Endogenous Ca2+ Buffers at the Presynaptic Terminals of the Crayfish Neuromuscular Junction
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. L. Dargan, B. Schwaller, and I. Parker
Spatiotemporal patterning of IP3-mediated Ca2+ signals in Xenopus oocytes by Ca2+-binding proteins
J. Physiol., April 15, 2004; 556(2): 447 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neher, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neher, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Biophysical Society.