| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, December 2000, p. 2783-2784, Vol. 79, No. 6
Department of Membrane Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
Ca2+-binding proteins are
dear to neuroanatomists because antibodies against them selectively
stain specific subpopulations of neurons in the brain (Andressen et
al., 1993 The action of fast Ca2+ buffers (the term
Ca2+ buffer will be restricted here to proteins
and other ligands binding Ca2+ and will not be
used for other Ca2+ sequestration mechanisms)
seems to be quite trivial Another issue is kinetics. While a fast buffer will simply diminish the
amplitude and slow down a Ca2+ transient (unless
it becomes saturated), a slow buffer will affect the time course of the
Ca2+ signal in a more complicated manner: a rapid
decay phase, which represents binding of Ca2+ to
the buffer, will be followed by a return to baseline, which is slower
than what would occur in the absence of buffer (Markram et al., 1998 Naegerl et al. work with droplets of "flashing solution," which is
a mixture of salts, a caged Ca2+ compound
(DM-Nitrophen), and a low-affinity Ca2+ indicator
dye. They measure free Ca2+ in the focal spot of
a confocal microscope (with the resting beam) and elicit transients in
free Ca2+ by photolysing DM-Nitrophen with a
flash of UV light. They analyze the decay of
[Ca2+] in the presence of
Ca2+ buffers (first EGTA to validate the method,
then calbindin-D28k) to determine kinetic rates of
Ca2+ binding. The method should be applicable to
intracellular measurements in any cell type that can be loaded with
Ca2+ indicator dyes and caged
Ca2+. This should complement other methods in
which intracellular buffers are titrated by continuous release of
Ca2+ from caged Ca2+ or by
multiple flashes (Xu et al., 1997 Naegerl et al. find that calbindin-D28k
Ca2+-binding kinetics are best described by
assuming two types of Ca2+-binding sites that
differ in affinity and rate constants by factors of 2 to 6. The binding
rate constants (~1 and 8 · 107
M In cerebellar Purkinje cells, known to contain large amounts of
calbindin-D28k, dendritic Ca2+ transients evoked
by subthreshold parallel fiber stimulation were significantly affected
when experiments were performed on calbindin-D28k-deficient (CB
![]()
ARTICLE
). Thus, one might conclude that they have very specific
functions, conferring distinct properties on the cell populations in
which they are expressed. Unfortunately, it must be concluded, however,
that we hardly understand what the staining pattern tells us, as the
functional significance of Ca2+ binding proteins
is only slowly emerging. Part of the reason for this ignorance is the
fact that there is a not so trivial interplay between
Ca2+ binding proteins, other cellular
Ca2+ buffers, Ca2+ release,
and Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms, not to mention the
Ca2+ indicator dyes that are used to measure
Ca2+ signals. To understand some aspects of this
interaction we not only need to know the amounts and affinities of the
Ca2+ chelators, but also their kinetic
properties. The paper by Naegerl et al. (2000)
in this issue
represents a big step toward providing such basic information by
measuring rate constants for Ca2+ binding and
dissociation of one of the most abundant
Ca2+-binding proteins, calbindin-D28k. This is
achieved by analyzing the time course of binding of
Ca2+ to the buffer after uncaging
Ca2+ with a UV flash. The method should be
readily applicable to other Ca2+-binding proteins
and should be portable to in vivo experiments.
to bind Ca2+ rapidly
and thereby lower its concentration. This, however, is true only
transiently; for instance, after a short episode of Ca2+ influx. As time goes on,
Ca2+ pumps will remove Ca2+
from the cytosol and from the buffers, establishing a steady state that
is determined by a balance between Ca2+ fluxes
across the boundaries surrounding the space occupied by cytosol. The
presence of buffers inside will not influence that balance and,
therefore, not change steady-state Ca2+ levels.
Buffers will, however, lengthen the time required for the steady state
to be achieved. In simple cases this lengthening will be by exactly the
same factor by which the amplitude of the transient is reduced, such
that the area under the transient (or the product of amplitude and time
constant) will not be influenced by the presence of the buffer. The
same will be true for the cumulative effect on any process that is
linearly dependent on Ca2+ (Neher, 1998
). This
simple consideration gives a hint as to why it is so difficult to
pinpoint the action of fast Ca2+ buffers: it
resides mainly in deviations from linearity of the Ca2+-effector systems. In order to appreciate
this, accurate numbers on affinities are required.
).
Complex time courses can result when Ca2+ binding
to buffers and sequestration by pumps occur on the same time scale (Lee
et al., 2000
). Furthermore, saturation of
Ca2+-binding proteins can lead to nonlinear
summation of Ca2+ signals and to changes in the
range of action of Ca2+ signals (Allbritton et
al., 1992
; Maeda et al., 1999
). For all these reasons accurate numbers
are required for simulating and interpreting the observed properties of
the Ca2+ signal. Given the fact that any cell may
contain several Ca2+ buffer species (including
the indicator dyes) and multiple extrusion mechanisms, the number of
model parameters in a simulation is large. Therefore, being able to fix
any one of them by an independent measurement is a blessing.
; Maeda et al., 1999
).
1 s
1
for the two sites, respectively) are surprisingly slow, the first one
being comparable to that of EGTA (a typical "slow" buffer) and the
second one being only 6-8 times faster. However, the value for EGTA
obtained with this method (1.05 · 107
M
1 s
1)
is somewhat fast compared to recent T-jump experiments under very
similar conditions (Naraghi, 1997
). Based on the comparison with EGTA,
calbindin-D28k might be considered to be situated between fast and slow
Ca2+ buffers. Its exact role in shaping the
Ca2+ signal within a living cell will depend on
its concentration and on influences exerted by other components of the
intracellular milieu.
/
)
mice (Airaksinen et al., 1997
). Peak amplitudes were clearly enhanced,
demonstrating that binding of Ca2+ to
calbindin-D28k was sufficiently fast to affect
[Ca2+]i within the first
100 ms after the influx of Ca2+. Caged
Ca2+ experiments on Purkinje cells have revealed
a high concentration of a high-affinity
Ca2+-binding protein with an affinity similar to
the numbers reported here (Maeda et al., 1999
). It was tentatively
assigned to calbindin-D28k, but was reported to have cooperative
Ca2+ binding, with an estimated Hill coefficient
between 2 and 4. A complication in the analysis of these results arises
from the fact that Purkinje cells not only express high levels of
calbindin-D28k, but also equally high concentrations of the "slow"
mobile buffer parvalbumin. It will be interesting to apply the method
of Naegerl et al. to such cells and to see how calbindin-D28k injected
into different types of neurones of CB
/
mice will affect
Ca2+ transients.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I thank B. Schwaller, Fribourg, for helpful suggestions regarding the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication 13 October 2000 and in final form 13 October 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
Biophys J, December 2000, p. 2783-2784, Vol. 79, No. 6
© 2000 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/00/12/2783/02 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Dupont, A. Abou-Lovergne, and L. Combettes Stochastic Aspects of Oscillatory Ca2+ Dynamics in Hepatocytes Biophys. J., September 1, 2008; 95(5): 2193 - 2202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-W. Lin, Q. Fu, and T. Allana Probing the Endogenous Ca2+ Buffers at the Presynaptic Terminals of the Crayfish Neuromuscular Junction J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 377 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Dargan, B. Schwaller, and I. Parker Spatiotemporal patterning of IP3-mediated Ca2+ signals in Xenopus oocytes by Ca2+-binding proteins J. Physiol., April 15, 2004; 556(2): 447 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |