| Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Model Trans-Membrane Peptides in Lipid Bilayers: A Systematic Investigation of Hydrophobic Mismatch Biophysical Journal, Volume 90, Issue 7, 1 April 2006, Pages 2326-2343 Senthil K. Kandasamy and Ronald G. Larson Abstract Hydrophobic mismatch, which is the difference between the hydrophobic length of -membrane segments of a protein and the hydrophobic width of the surrounding lipid bilayer, is known to play a role in membrane protein function. We have performed molecular dynamics simulations of -membrane KALP peptides (sequence: GKK(LA)LKKA) in phospholipid bilayers to investigate hydrophobic mismatch alleviation mechanisms. By varying systematically the length of the peptide (KALP, KALP, KALP, KALP, and KALP) and the lipid hydrophobic length (DLPC, DMPC, and DPPC), a wide range of mismatch conditions were studied. Simulations of durations of 50–200ns show that under positive mismatch, the system alleviates the mismatch predominantly by tilting the peptide and to a smaller extent by increased lipid ordering in the immediate vicinity of the peptide. Under negative mismatch, alleviation takes place by a combination of local bilayer bending and the snorkeling of the lysine residues of the peptide. Simulations performed at a higher peptide/lipid molar ratio (1:25) reveal slower dynamics of both the peptide and lipid relative to those at a lower peptide/lipid ratio (1:128). The lysine residues have favorable interactions with specific oxygen atoms of the phospholipid headgroups, indicating the preferred localization of these residues at the lipid/water interface. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (739 kb) |
| Amino-Acid Solvation Structure in Transmembrane Helices from Molecular Dynamics Simulations Biophysical Journal, Volume 91, Issue 12, 15 December 2006, Pages 4450-4463 Anna C.V. Johansson and Erik Lindahl Abstract Understanding the solvation of amino acids in biomembranes is an important step to better explain membrane protein folding. Several experimental studies have shown that polar residues are both common and important in transmembrane segments, which means they have to be solvated in the hydrophobic membrane, at least until helices have aggregated to form integral proteins. In this work, we have used computer simulations to unravel these interactions on the atomic level, and classify intramembrane solvation properties of amino acids. Simulations have been performed for systematic mutations in poly-Leu helices, including not only each amino acid type, but also every z-position in a model helix. Interestingly, many polar or charged residues do not desolvate completely, but rather retain hydration by snorkeling or pulling in water/headgroups—even to the extent where many of them exist in a microscopic polar environment, with hydration levels corresponding well to experimental hydrophobicity scales. This suggests that even for polar/charged residues a large part of solvation cost is due to entropy, not enthalpy loss. Both hydration level and hydrogen bonding exhibit clear position-dependence. Basic side chains cause much less membrane distortion than acidic, since they are able to form hydrogen bonds with carbonyl groups instead of water or headgroups. This preference is supported by sequence statistics, where basic residues have increased relative occurrence at carbonyl -coordinates. Snorkeling effects and N-/C-terminal orientation bias are directly observed, which significantly reduces the effective thickness of the hydrophobic core. Aromatic side chains intercalate efficiently with lipid chains (improving Trp/Tyr anchoring to the interface) and Ser/Thr residues are stabilized by hydroxyl groups sharing hydrogen bonds to backbone oxygens. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (855 kb) |
| Molecular Dynamics Study of the Lung Surfactant Peptide SP-B1–25 with DPPC Monolayers: Insights into Interactions and Peptide Position and Orientation Biophysical Journal, Volume 88, Issue 3, 1 March 2005, Pages 1577-1592 Senthil K. Kandasamy and Ronald G. Larson Abstract We have performed molecular dynamics simulations of the interactions of the peptide SP-B, which is a truncated version of the full pulmonary surfactant protein SP-B, with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine monolayers, which are the major lipid components of lung surfactant. Simulations of durations of 10–20ns show that persistent hydrogen bonds form between the donor atoms of the protein and the acceptors of the lipid headgroup and that these bonds determine the position, orientation, and secondary structure of the peptide in the membrane environment. From an ensemble of initial conditions, the most probable equilibrium orientation of the -helix of the peptide is predicted to be parallel to the interface, matching recent experimental results on model lipid mixtures. Simulations of a few mutated analogs of SP-B also suggest that the charged amino acids are important in determining the position of the peptide in the interface. The first eight amino acids of the peptide, also known as the insertion sequence, are found to be essential in reducing the fluctuations and anchoring the peptide in the lipid/water interface. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (845 kb) |
Copyright © 2005 The Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.
Biophysical Journal, Volume 89, Issue 4, 2296-2306, 1 October 2005
doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.063040
Biophysical Theory and Modeling
Christian Appelt, Frank Eisenmenger, Ronald Kühne, Peter Schmieder and J. Arvid Söderhäll
, 
Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
Address reprint requests to J. Arvid Söderhäll, Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.Antimicrobial peptides are an important part of the defense system against microbial infections in eukaryotes. The peptides differ in size, composition, and secondary structure, but most of them are amphipathic and have a positive net charge. The peptides are believed to target the bacterial membrane and destroy the chemical gradients over the membrane 1. Probably, this takes place via a disruption of the membrane, either via an ordered pore formation, which is described by the toroidal model and the barrel-stave model 2, or in a disordered manner, where the peptides adhere to the surface and destabilize the membrane, resulting in its collapse, which is often referred to as the carpet model 3. Also a combination of the ordered and disordered mechanisms has been suggested as a possible mechanism 4.
Although lipids have a remarkable ability to form new phases, minor balances must be changed to initiate a new phase formation 5,6. The antimicrobial peptide must be able to influence this phase behavior to exert its activity, regardless of the model. Studies of this type of lipid-peptide interaction have always faced experimental difficulties in the determination of structures at atomic resolution, due to the inherently disordered structure of membranes in the biologically relevant liquid crystalline phase. Moreover, the use of probes, such as fluorescence labeling, will have an effect on the membrane structure 7. The progress in computer simulations of membranes during the last decade has now made it possible to model these chaotic systems at atomic resolution on the timescale from 10−15 to 10−7s. Consequently, many investigations of the interactions of various types of peptides with various types of lipid membranes using MD simulations have appeared recently 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Some of these studies have turned out to be useful in the determination of induced structural stability of the peptide 9,18.
Recently, the structure of the hexapeptide Ac-RRWWRF-NH2 was reported 19. The peptide was identified by screening a synthetic combinatorial library, and it has a large influence on the thermotropic phase behavior in model membranes having anionic PG headgroups. In contrast, it has little effect on membranes containing zwitterionic PC headgroups. Jing et al. conclude that the structure of the peptide was stabilized in the presence of anionic lipids. By preparing a head-to-tail cyclic peptide, c-RW, Dathe and co-workers 20,21 obtained a peptide with lytic activity on membranes with anionic as well as zwitterionic headgroups. They also suggest that the c-RW targets the bacterial membrane rather than an intracellular target to exert its antimicrobial activity. This study is based upon their assumption. Recently, we have determined the NMR structure of c-RW (among others) bound to sodium dodecyl sulfate and DPC micelles 22. The structure of the peptide when bound to the micelles resembles two short β-strands and the side chains are oriented so that one side of the peptide is hydrophilic and the other is hydrophobic. Also the position and orientation of c-RW relative to the micelle surface was investigated; c-RW turned out to be half buried in the hydrophobic core with the peptide backbone plane parallel to the micelle surface. Here, we follow up the structure determination using molecular dynamics simulations of c-RW in the presence of explicit DPPC membranes to validate the NMR structure calculated in vacuum and to investigate the effect of c-RW on the membrane. It is known from experiments that the peptide lyses POPC as well as POPG vesicles at a ratio of 1:10 20. Since the peptide is about as active on anionic PG as on zwitterionic PC lipid headgroups, and because the NMR structure is determined in micelles having a PC headgroup, we have chosen a DPPC bilayer as a model membrane. Moreover, DPPC membranes are well characterized by many different experimental techniques as well as by numerous MD simulations, which gives us access to a wide range of independent checkpoints that are exploited in the analysis.
We have carried out a series of simulations covering times up to 100ns at peptide/lipid ratios of 0:128, 2:128, and 12:128. The systems are from now on denoted as 0:128, 2:128, and 12:128, referring to the respective peptide/lipid ratios. Simulating at relevant peptide/lipid ratios, the trajectories were analyzed with respect to specific lipid properties and to peptide-lipid interactions that constitute important steps toward membrane disruption. We confirm the NMR structure calculated in vacuum, and we observe various effects, showing that the presence of the peptides destabilizes the liquid crystalline phase by changing the force balance at the membrane-water interface.
The systems that have been studied are DPPC membranes consisting of 128 lipids, ∼5780 SPC water molecules, and a variable number of Cl− counterions. We have simulated three such membranes accommodating 0, 2, and 12 c-RW peptides each. We have made two separate simulations of each of the 2:128 and 12:128 systems, where one simulation was made including the structural restraints on the peptide as derived from NMR results 22 and the other was restraint free. The restrained simulations are carried out to confirm the NMR structure calculations in vacuum. The restraint-free simulations were started using the final structures from the restrained simulations, to avoid long equilibration simulations. The pure membrane simulations have been used as reference systems. The setup of the different simulations is summarized in Table 1. The simulation software was GROMACS 3.1 23,24. The start conformation of the DPPC membrane was downloaded from the homepage of D. P. Tieleman (http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/) 25. All calculations were made on desktop computers. The CPU time was ∼35h per nanosecond simulation on dual Intel Pentium IV 3.0GHz processors.
| Table 1 Gross properties obtained from the simulations |
| System | ttot (ns) | D* peptide(× 10−7 cm2/s) | D* lipid(× 10−7 cm2/s) | Membrane area (nm2) | Lipid area (nm2)† | SCD‡ | ΔGmax§ (kJ/mol) | Barrier width¶ (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0:128 | 100 | — | 4.2±1.5 | 41.8±0.6 | 0.65 | 0.193 | 27.9±1.9 | 1.4 | ||
| 0:64 | 136 | — | 5.1±1.4 | 20.9±0.5 | 0.65 | 0.195 | 28.4±3.4 | 1.5 | ||
| 0:64∥ | 50 | — | 12.6±4.1 | 22.0±0.4 | 0.69 | 0.181 | 27.0±1.2 | 1.5 | ||
| 2:128 | 100 | 1.0±0.25 | 3.8±1.6 | 41.3±0.6 | 0.62 | 0.206 | 29.0 | 1.5 | ||
| 12:128 | 128 | 0.5±0.1 | 1.3±0.6 | 43.8±0.8 | 0.55 | 0.205 | 28.7±1.7 | 0.9 | ||
| 12:128∥ | 10 | 8.9±6.1 | 3.7±3.5 | 44.3±0.4 | 0.56 | 0.194 | 24.8** | 0.7 | ||
| * Slope of a line fitted to the mean-square displacement over the time window 1–3ns. † Assuming an area of 1.4nm2 per peptide. ‡ Order parameter for C4 and C4′. The standard deviation for the order parameters is ∼1%. § Water free-energy maximum. ¶ Water free-energy barrier thickness at ΔG=20kJ/mol in nanometers. ∥ Simulation temperature 353K. ** Error cannot be estimated because of the short simulation time. |
To assess the suitability of the applied simulation conditions we performed a set of simulations of a pure DPPC bilayer (0:128 and 0:64 system). The systems were equilibrated until the values for deuterium order parameter and area per lipid were stable during a 5-ns time window (summarized in Table 1). These are comparable to other simulations under equivalent conditions and agree well with experimental values. Furthermore, the system was affected neither by changing the time steps from 2 to 5 fs nor by increasing the size from a 64-lipid to a 128-lipid box.
To rapidly reach an equilibrated state of the 2:128 simulation we used the modified GROMACS code “HOLE” 26 to create cavities with the shape of the peptide surface in the 0:128 system where the two peptides could be inserted (Fig. 1). In this case we therefore assume the structure, the position, and the orientation of the peptide with respect to the lipid bilayer, as derived from the NMR experiments 22. The peptides were oriented with the aromatic side chains sticking down into the aliphatic region of the membrane and the polar face of the backbone and the arginine residues pointing toward the bulk water. The plane formed by the backbone was put parallel to the membrane surface. The peptide backbone was placed in the region of the phosphocholine groups. Thereafter, six Cl− counterions were added. As mentioned, we have made two simulations of the 2:128 system, one where the structure restraints derived from NMR were used throughout the simulation (20-ns length), and the second a production simulation without NMR restraints (80-ns length). We did this to make sure that we simulated the correct structure of the peptide on the one hand (which is known to have a crucial impact on the peptide-membrane interaction 9,18), and to test the stability of the NMR structure on the other hand. The system was considered equilibrated after 8ns simulation, as judged by the convergence of lipid deuterium order parameters, area per lipid, and the number of peptide-lipid hydrogen bonds.
The initial conformation was prepared by stripping of the water and the ions from the 2:128 system and adding five peptides in the vacuum above each surface of the membrane. Also in this case, the orientation of the peptides was assumed, as discussed above. Thereafter, water was added outside the peptides, and lastly the 36 Cl− counterions were introduced. The system was equilibrated to a correct density by carefully compressing the periodic box using a constant pressure simulation. During this equilibration both the membrane and peptide coordinates were restrained in the xy plane and free to move along the membrane normal. This equilibration scheme was used to observe the unbiased depth of insertion. The system was considered as equilibrated after 28ns simulation, as judged by the convergence of lipid deuterium order parameters, area per lipid, and the number of peptide-lipid hydrogen bonds. Two separate unrestrained 12:128 simulations were made to increase sampling without increasing the computational overhead caused by parallelization. The runs were started at the end of the restrained 12:128 simulation, but with randomized velocities. The statistical data from these simulations was merged, except for the lateral diffusion analysis, since this requires a continuous time trajectory.
All systems were simulated using an NPT ensemble with separate pressure control for the x, y, and z components in the box. The pressure and temperature scaling was achieved using the Berendsen thermo- and barostat 27 using τT=0.1ps and τp=1.0ps. We used separate thermostats for the lipids, the peptides, and the water and ions, all set to 323K. To investigate the effect of a higher temperature, the 0:128 and 12:128 systems were also simulated at 353K. The neighbor list, for atoms within the cutoff of 10Å, was updated every 10th time step. This cutoff was used for the Lennard-Jones interactions and for the real-space electrostatic interactions. The long range electrostatic interactions were calculated using a particle mesh Ewald summation 28. For the fast-bonded vibrations the LINCS 29,30 algorithm was used. This setup has been tested, and found to be stable 31, and our simulations reproduce these results to a satisfactory degree. For the DPPC molecules, an optimized potentials for liquid simulations model was used 32, and for the peptide the standard GROMACS united-atom force field was used 33. In this force field, hydrogens bound to aliphatic carbons are treated implicitly, whereas hydrogen bond donating and aromatic hydrogens are treated explicitly. The rigid SPC water model was used 34. In all simulations including peptides we have used a time step of 2 fs, since the explicit hydrogen atoms in the peptides are not stable using a longer time step. As a check we have simulated the pure membrane using a 2-fs as well as a 5-fs time step and no significant differences were observed (data not presented).
The trajectories were analyzed with respect to order parameters, partial densities, lateral diffusion, and membrane area using the standard tools included in the GROMACS distribution. All reported standard deviations are calculated by splitting the trajectory into five pieces and calculating the property of interest within each piece, and then calculating the standard deviation of the pieces. This is of particular importance for uncertain properties like lateral diffusion and free-energy barriers. To get a statistical view of the membrane surface in a coordinate system locked to a peptide at the membrane surface, a special tool was developed. The peptide coordinate system (x, y, z) (Fig. 2) was calculated for each frame in the trajectory using a least-square fitted plane spanned by the Cα atoms in the peptide and the direction of the first β-strand. Then a least-square fitted plane spanned by the CG2 (see Fig. 3) atoms (or an arbitrary lipid atom) in the lipids was calculated, forming a new coordinate system (x′, y′, z′). The x′ axis is the projection of the x axis, the z′ axis is the normal to the membrane plane, and the y′ axis is orthogonal to x′ and z′. Then, selected lipid and peptide atom populations were plotted in a histogram fashion using 1-Å or 3-Å spacing grids in the x′, y′ plane. This gives a statistical view of the position of lipid atoms in the vicinity of the peptide and a statistical projection of the peptide onto the x′, y′ plane. The outermost atoms in the lipids, or the “real” surface, can also be accessed by this tool in the following way: In each grid cell (size 1Å), the distance from the midplane of the atom the farthest away is measured, then the average distance in each grid cell is calculated. This has been computed for the unrestrained 2:128 simulation consisting of 8000 frames over 80ns.
The structure of the membrane-bound peptides has been analyzed by taking snapshots from the simulations at regular intervals. We calculated the RMSD values in all simulations to be able to compare these structures with those in the NMR investigation 22. The RMSD values are summarized in Table 2 and a comparison of average structures is shown in Fig. 4. In general, the structures as well as the RMSD values obtained by the NMR structure calculations for DPC micelle-bound c-RW are very similar to the structures obtained in the simulations of the 2:128 and 12:128 systems, whether the NMR-restraints were used or not. This gives strong support to the presented peptide structure, whereas the calculations are made under quite different conditions. The backbone forms the typical minimal β-sheet, with one strand including R2, W3, and W4 and the other including R5, F6, and R1. The side chains appear to be more flexible than the NMR structure suggests. For example, the phenylalanine side chain is found to have two populated rotamers in the structure presented here, whereas in the NMR structure the phenylalanine side chain is always directed toward R5. Nevertheless, the strongly amphipathic structure is maintained with the hydrophilic part formed by the backbone and the arginine side chains and the hydrophobic part formed by the cluster of aromatic side chains.
| Table 2 RMSD values within separate simulations |
| System | No. of frames | RMSD, backbone (Å) | RMSD, all heavy atoms (Å) | RMSD to NMR, all heavy atoms (Å)* | RMSD to NMR, backbone (Å)* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMR† | 10 | 0.41±0.13 | 1.94±0.48 | — | — | ||
| 2:128‡ | 40 | 0.57±0.057 | 2.98±0.22 | 2.25 | 0.45 | ||
| 2:128§ | 160 | 0.57±0.051 | 2.53±0.40 | 1.97 | 0.44 | ||
| 12:128‡ | 96 | 0.60±0.21 | 2.86±0.62 | 2.00 | 0.43 | ||
| 12:128§ | 168 | 0.55±0.21 | 2.83±0.65 | 2.12 | 0.44 | ||
| * The RMSD to NMR refers to the deviation of average structures relative to the average NMR structure in DPC micelles, as shown in Fig. 4. † NMR structure bound to DPC micelle. ‡ NMR-derived restraints used during the simulation. § Restraint-free simulation. |
Since the structures obtained in the restrained and the unrestrained simulations are almost identical to the NMR structure (Table 2 and Fig. 4), the peptide conformation is stabilized by the interaction with the bilayer and not exclusively induced by restraints. An ensemble superposition of structures gives the effective shape of the peptide, acting on the membrane. In Fig. 5, 108 structure snapshots of the 12 peptides distributed over the entire unrestrained 12:128 trajectory have been superimposed. The effective shape of the peptide is almost a half-sphere, with the hydrophilic, flat surface facing the water and the spherical, hydrophobic side facing the membrane interior. The angles between the peptide-plane normal and membrane-plane normal in the 2:128 system were 20±8° and 15±7° for the two peptides, where R1 and R2 are more exposed to water than W4 and R5 in the other end of the small β-sheet, which is in good agreement with the NMR results 22. This is explained by the fact that the R1 and R2 end is more hydrophilic than the W4 and R5 end, as seen in Fig. 5.
The atom densities along the membrane normal give a rough picture of how different groups in the system are distributed. In Fig. 6, the densities from the three systems are depicted. By using this representation, the membrane may be divided into four regions 35,36: 1), the perturbed-water region, where water molecules show an orientational preference; 2), the membrane-water interface, ranging from the region where the water and the lipids have equal densities to the region where water density approaches zero; 3), the ordered-tails region, where the density of the lipid tails reaches its maximum; and 4), the disordered-tails region, where the lipid tail density approaches its minimum. The peptides are positioned in the membrane-water interface and in the ordered-tails region as shown in Fig. 6. The orientation of the peptide, as suggested by the NMR results, is confirmed during the simulation. The peptides in the 12:128 system insert spontaneously with approximately the same depth and orientation as in the prepositioned 2:128 system. The cluster of aromatic side chains is deeper inserted in the bilayer than the backbone and the arginine side chains. The indole group reaches its free-energy minimum level at ∼1nm from the membrane midplane 11, which is reached when the tryptophan side chains are deeply inserted in the membrane. The “snorkeling” 37 arginine side chains are oriented slightly upward. In this way the guanidino moieties can make polar interactions to the lipid headgroups whereas the aliphatic parts of the side chains are located closer to the more hydrophobic ordered-tails region. This snorkeling effect is more pronounced for 12:128 simulation and can be explained by a different hydrogen bonding scheme, as discussed below.
The water penetration free-energy barrier is significantly affected by the presence of the peptide. The free-energy barrier is calculated by
![]() |
is the water density along the membrane normal obtained from the simulations and kT is the Boltzmann constant times the simulation temperature. In Fig. 6, the barriers from the simulations are shown. As seen in the figure, the error increases close to the membrane midplane. This is due to the fact that the water density in the membrane core is very low. During the entire simulation, we observe only very few water passages. In the 0:128 system, the plateau lies at 27.9±1.8kJ/mol, which can be compared to the previously reported value of 26kJ/mol 35. For the 12:128 system the barrier is at 28.7±1.7kJ/mol, which is essentially the same as the 0:128 system; however, there is no plateau but rather a peak, and the shape of the barrier has changed significantly. In the presence of the c-RW peptides, the water molecules penetrate further into the hydrophobic core than is possible in the 0:128 system. The barrier at 20kJ/mol is ∼0.5nm thinner in the 12:128 system compared to the 0:128 system. The water barrier in the 2:128 is actually almost 0.1nm thicker than the 0:128 system at 20kJ/mol; however, this barely significant thickening effect has its origin in the general thickening of the membrane, as will be discussed below.The total membrane area is a sensitive diagnosis for the force balance within the membrane 31. The literature value for DPPC lipid area varies, but a reasonable estimate is 0.64nm238. The values we have determined for the 0:128 and 0:64 systems agree well with this value. Since we add peptides to the surface, we expect to see an increase in the total membrane area. A rough estimate of the peptide area projected onto the membrane is at least 2 times the area of a lipid molecule, or 1.4nm2. If the area was simply additive, we would thus expect an area increase of ∼3% and 18% in the 2:128 and 12:128 systems, respectively. However, as presented in Table 1, this is not the case. The area increase is insignificant for the 2:128 system and only 5% for the 12:128 system. It is therefore clear that the lipids get more packed in the presence of peptides. In Table 1, the lipid area is listed, under the assumption that each peptide occupies 1.4nm2.
Deuterium order parameters, SCD, measure the order of the lipid tails 36,39. Close to the lipid headgroups, the order is quite high, meaning that the tails are mutually aligned, whereas deeper in the core of the membrane, the order parameters decrease and in the midplane they assume almost isotropical values. In the presence of the c-RW peptide, the order gets slightly, but still statistically significantly, higher in the ordered-tails region, as shown in Fig. 7. At first, this might seem counterintuitive, but considering the fact that the system is more closely packed, as observed in the membrane area (see Table 1), the only option for the lipid tails is to pack and align tighter to the adjacent lipid tails. Only the first eight to nine methylene groups in the tails are significantly affected by the packing, whereas the inner part of the membrane is unaffected. Since the simulation temperature of 323K is close to the Tm of DPPC at 314.6K, we also performed simulations at 353K. The increased simulation temperature affected the 0:128 system and 12:128 in a coherent manner. In both systems the order parameters decreased by ∼0.1units. This indicates that the increased order parameter in the presence of the peptide is a generally valid result, and is not caused by inducing a shift in the Tm.
To get a statistical view of the lipid organization and topology in the vicinity of a peptide, the 2:128 system was analyzed using the special tool described in the Methods section. In Fig. 8 the population of lipids around the peptide is shown. Both peptides arrest up to eight lipid molecules in their close vicinity. For the coordination of the lipid headgroups one guanidino moiety in the arginine side chain binds up to three lipid molecules. Also at W4, there is an increased lipid population. It is worth noting that within these aggregates the lipids are confined to distinct positions, and thus interact specifically with the peptides rather than forming a layer of unspecifically bound lipids. In Table 3 the hydrogen bond distribution between peptides, lipids, and water is summarized. The arginine side chains account for the majority of the hydrogen bonds formed by the peptide. In the 2:128 simulation, most hydrogen bonds are formed to the DPPC acyl ester oxygen (the oxygen of glycerol and the acyl chain) and the oxygen of the phosphate. An example of such a complex arginine-lipid complex is shown in Fig. 9. It is worth noting that the geometry allows the formation of two hydrogen bonds between guanidino group and lipid, thereby increasing the stability of the complex. At increased peptide concentration (the 12:128 system) the ability to form hydrogen bonds to the acyl ester is decreased. These are partially compensated by hydrogen bonding to water. Nevertheless, the overall number of hydrogen bonds formed by the peptide was slightly decreased. The number of inter- and intramolecular peptide-peptide hydrogen bonds was 1.5 in both the 2:128 and 12:128 simulations. Due to the large amount of guanidino groups as interaction partners in the 12:128 system the lipids showed a significant loss of hydration, as can be seen by the decrease in the total number of hydrogen bonds.
| Table 3 Number of hydrogen bonds between lipids and water, and between peptides and water |
| Acyl ester oxygen | Phosphate oxygen | Water | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0:128 system | Water* | 2.4±0.1 | 3.8±0.1 | — | — | ||
| 2:128 system | Peptide† | 8.4±1.4 | 5.6±1.2 | 2.7±0.9 | 16.7±1.5 | ||
| Arginine side chains† | 6.0±1.3 | 5.2±1.3 | 1.2±0.9 | 12.4±1.2 | |||
| Water* | 2.3±0.1 | 3.7±0.1 | — | — | |||
| 12:128 system | Peptide† | 4.8±0.4 | 6.7±0.5 | 4.0±0.7 | 15.5±0.5 | ||
| Arginine side chains† | 3.2±0.4 | 5.6±0.5 | 2.8±0.5 | 11.6±0.5 | |||
| Water* | 2.0±0.1 | 3.2±0.1 | — | — | |||
| * H-bonds calculated per lipid. † H-bonds calculated per peptide. |
Another population analysis describes the void that is formed by the peptide in the lipid bilayer. The population of individual lipid acyl chain carbons around the peptide is plotted in Fig. 10. The acyl carbons close to the lipid headgroups are displaced from the center of the coordinate system, meaning that they are not able to enter the area below or above the peptide. The presence of the peptide obviously creates a void in the membrane surface stretching down to at least atom C8 in the acyl tails. Given the reduced effective area per lipid, this means that the membrane is unusually compressed to this point. In contrast, the carbons toward the end of the acyl chain are found below the peptide. They can occupy a close to normal area and are thus less affected by the peptide insertion. The result is an increased density difference between the ordered-tails region and disordered-tails region.
The lateral diffusion coefficient, D, is significantly decreased in the presence of the c-RW peptide. D was measured by a standard procedure where the slope of a line fitted to the mean-square displacement of the molecule of interest, gives D for the time window used in the line fitting. The trajectories were corrected for the random relative motion of the center of mass of each monolayer 31 before evaluation. The results are listed in Table 1. The diffusion coefficient of lipids in bilayer systems are dependent on the observed timescale 40, but the values obtained for the 0:128 system (timescale, 1–3ns) agree reasonably well with experimental measurements on shorter timescales 41. However, the diffusion of the lipids in the 12:128 system is reduced to
The lipid diffusion in the 2:128 system is marginally affected. Interestingly, the lateral diffusion of the c-RW peptide is almost constant irrespective of the peptide/lipid ratio, suggesting that peptide-lipid aggregates with similar diffusion properties are formed. These aggregates have been discussed and are shown in Fig. 8.
The initial structure of the c-RW peptide was well conserved throughout all the long simulations and under all tested conditions. The characteristic β-sheet, the amphipathic structure, and the mode of insertion remained stable. This demonstrates clearly that the NMR data derived from micelle systems are also valid for lipid bilayers. Further support comes from CD spectroscopy, in which almost identical spectra were found for the peptide bound to sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles and to POPC bilayers 20. This suggests that the conformation and orientation of the peptide is identical in bilayers and in micelles. Based on this good agreement of experimental and theoretical data, the simulation series presented herein is well suited to draw further conclusions on how this antimicrobial peptide exerts its function.
The peptides were located exclusively in the membrane-water interface and the ordered-tails region 35. The cationic guanidino moieties of the arginines were located at the glycerol groups of the lipids, and the hydrophobic tryptophan and phenylalanine side chains were located in the ordered-tails region. The position of positive charges on the membrane surface, on the one hand, and bulky amphiphilic and hydrophobic groups in the membrane-water interface and ordered-tails regions, on the other, alters general membrane properties in the following two distinct ways.
Recently, an investigation of the influence of sodium ions on fundamental membrane properties has been reported 42. The sodium ions accumulated at approximately the same position as the arginine side chains and affected the bilayer similarly; the effective lipid area decreases remarkably, the deuterium order parameters increase, and the membrane grows slightly thicker. According to Böckmann and co-workers, this is all due to the same effect; repulsion of the cations bound at both membrane surfaces. The cations on both sides are separated by the hydrophobic core, having a low dielectric constant; therefore, the repulsion is not shielded. The anionic chloride ions are dispersed in the water solution outside the membrane and do not provide any electrostatic screening. When both sides of the membrane are repulsed, the lipids are stretched out, causing a thicker membrane and increased order parameters, and they grow thinner, resulting in a decreased lipid area. Moreover, Böckmann and co-workers also found that one sodium ion is coordinated by three lipid carbonyl oxygen atoms. This complex formation around the sodium ion with up to three lipid molecules led to a decrease in lateral diffusion coefficient of the lipids, although not as dramatic as the decrease in diffusion caused by the c-RW peptide reported here. The lipids were arrested at well-defined positions mainly around the arginine side chains of the peptide, suggesting that the complex formation was mediated by hydrogen bonds. The peptide c-KW is less biologically active despite comparable structure, charge, and amphpathicity 20, probably because lysine side chains possess only three hydrogen bond donors, whereas arginine has five hydrogen bond donors. Therefore lysine is less favorable for the complex formation with lipids, which obviously has some impact on the biological activity. However, this leads us to the second effect that c-RW has on the structure of the membrane.
During the simulation we observed the formation of a cavity in the ordered-tails region caused by insertion of the aromatic residues in the hydrophobic core. The cavity influences the tails approximately down to C8, as seen in Fig. 10. This is also reflected in the increase of the order parameters: atoms C2 to about C8 are significantly more ordered, whereas further down in the disordered-tails region the difference between the 0:128 system and the peptide-containing systems becomes marginal (see Fig. 7). The resulting compression of only the outer membrane region exerts a curvature strain that may drive the pore formation, which has been suggested before 4. Furthermore, the presence of the peptide decreases the contact between adjacent lipids, and therefore the forces that prevent lipids from protruding out of, or into, the membrane surface are decreased. This is reflected in the small broadening of the distribution of the phosphocholine and glycerol groups in the presence of the peptide (see Fig. 6). Although this effect seems marginal in the density, it has a profound impact on the water permeation barrier, which in the 12:128 simulation has lost >30% of its thickness compared to the 0:128 and 2:128 systems. This unusual occurrence of water deeper in the hydrophobic core in the presence of a tryptophan-containing peptide has been observed experimentally and the authors ascribe this either to the local disorder in the hydrophobic core or to water that is associated with the tryptophan 43. However, the arginines are responsible for most hydrogen bond formation by the peptide and thus a significant portion of the water is bound to guanidino moieties. In the 12:128 system, peptide-to-lipid hydrogen bonds were replaced by peptide-to-water hydrogen bonds. This shift could be due to a saturation of the membrane capacity to accommodate cationic charges and hydrogen bond donors. The increased water binding is accompanied by an increased snorkeling of the arginine side chains. Since the guanidino moieties have to compensate the lack of hydrogen bond acceptors they have to seek water. This has the effect that the arginine density shifts toward the water in the 12:128 system, compared to the 2:128 system, as seen in Fig. 6. Apparently, the aromatic side chains have the function to anchor the peptide deeply in the membrane interface, whereas the arginines are responsible for the attraction of hydrogen bond acceptors. When the membrane is saturated, water molecules are attracted.
Since the proton gradient barrier depends widely on its nonpermeability to water 44, the breakdown of the proton gradient across the bacterial membrane can be achieved in the absence of stable pores 3. Even though the maximum free energy for a water molecule crossing the membrane remains the same in all three systems, a considerable thinning of the barrier could lead to a drastic increase in proton leakage, which resembles an alternative way of dissipating the proton gradient independent of pore formation.
Another important observation in the simulation is the occurrence of peptide-lipid aggregates; ∼8 lipid molecules are bound to one peptide. In that way the majority of lipids are restricted in their movement in the 12:128 simulation, which causes a drastic decrease in the bilayer fluidity, as indicated by the lateral diffusion coefficient. Complex formation of lipids with antimicrobial peptides has been reported before 1,4. It is assumed that this is an important step in the formation of a “dynamic, peptide-lipid supramolecular complex pore” 1,4. It also has been suggested that an expanding membrane area and thinning of the outer leaflet results in strain of the bilayer, inducing pore formation 1. However, the effect observed in the presence of c-RW, thinning of the water permeation barrier, and the void formation induced by the peptide also induce a strain resulting in an unstable membrane. As pointed out previously, a membrane is planar as long as the membrane stabilizing forces are in balance 5,6. In the presence of water in the hydrophobic core, the formation of a cavity, and tight aggregation of the headgroups, this balance is shifted. The exact consequences of this balance shift and the stoichiometric composition of supramolecular peptide-lipid aggregates is strongly dependent on experimental conditions such as temperature, lipid type, pH, and salt concentration.
The simulations presented here, based on substantial experimental data, describe in atomic detail the interactions of the antimicrobial peptide c-RW with a lipid bilayer. The microscopical parameters that were derived indicated that fundamental properties such as fluidity and water penetration barrier were affected, pointing to how the peptide might exert its antimicrobial activity.
Margitta Dathe is acknowledged for discussions.
C.A. thanks the Fonds der chemischen Industrie for a Kekulé fellowship.
1. (2002). Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415, 389–395. CrossRef | PubMed
2. (2000). Action of antimicrobial peptides: two-state model. Biochemistry 39, 8347–8352. PubMed
3. (2002). Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 66, 236–248. CrossRef | PubMed
4. (1999). Why and how are peptide-lipid interactions utilized for self-defense? Magainins and tachyplesins as archetypes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1462, 1–10. PubMed
5. (1996). Lateral pressure in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1286, 183–223. PubMed
6. (2000). Spatial and energetic-entropic decomposition of surface tension in lipid bilayers from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 3882–3893. CrossRef | PubMed
7. (1998). Electrochemical measurement of lateral diffusion coefficients of ubiquinones and plastoquinones of various isoprenoid chain lengths incorporated in model bilayers. Biophys. J. 74, 1937–1948. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (260 kb) | PubMed
8. (2003). Peripheral binding mode and penetration depth of cobra cardiotoxin on phospholipid membranes as studied by a combined FTIR and computer simulation approach. Biochemistry 42, 7457–7466. PubMed
9. (2003). Interactions of the designed antimicrobial peptide MB21 and truncated dermaseptin S3 with lipid bilayers: molecular-dynamics simulations. Biochem. J. 370, 233–243. CrossRef | PubMed
10. (2003). Construction of a toroidal model for the magainin pore. J. Mol. Model. 9, 217–224. PubMed
11. (2002). Interaction of tryptophan analogs with POPC lipid bilayers investigated by molecular dynamics calculations. Langmuir. 18, 198–210. CrossRef | PubMed
12. (1999). Alamethicin helices in a bilayer and in solution: molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 76, 40–49. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (457 kb) | PubMed
13. (1999). Simulation studies of the interaction of antimicrobial peptides and lipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1462, 185–200. PubMed
14. (1999). Interactions of alpha-helices with lipid bilayers: a review of simulation studies. Biophys. Chem. 76, 161–183. CrossRef | PubMed
15. (2004). Effect of the pore region of a transmembrane ion channel on the physical properties of a simple membrane. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 2608–2613. PubMed
16. (2002). Towards an understanding of complex biological membranes from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Biosci. Rep. 22, 151–173. CrossRef | PubMed
17. (2001). Molecular dynamics simulations of ubiquinone inside a lipid bilayer. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105, 9308–9315. PubMed
18. (1999). Surface binding of alamethicin stabilizes its helical structure: molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 76, 3186–3191. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (335 kb) | PubMed
19. (2003). The structure of the antimicrobial peptide Ac-RRWWRF-NH2 bound to micelles and its interactions with phospholipid bilayers. J. Pept. Res. 61, 219–229. PubMed
20. (2004). Cyclization increases the antimicrobial activity and selectivity of arginine- and tryptophan-containing hexapeptides. Biochemistry 43, 9140–9150. PubMed
21. (2004). Antimicrobial activity of arginine- and tryptophan-rich hexapeptides: the effects of aromatic clusters, D-amino acid substitution and cyclization. J. Pept. Res. 64, 159–169. CrossRef | PubMed
22. (2005). Structure of the antimicrobial, cationic hexapeptide cyclo(RRWWRF) and its analogues in solution and bound to detergent micelles. Chembiochem. 6, 1654–1662. CrossRef | PubMed
23. (2001). GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. 7, 306–317. PubMed
24. (1995). GROMACS—a message-passing parallel molecular-dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 43–56. PubMed
25. (1996). Molecular dynamics simulations of a fully hydrated dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine bilayer with different macroscopic boundary conditions and parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4871–4880. CrossRef | PubMed
26. (2002). Setting up and optimization of membrane protein simulations. Eur. Biophys. J. 31, 217–227. CrossRef | PubMed
27. (1984). Molecular-dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690. CrossRef | PubMed
28. (1995). A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593. CrossRef | PubMed
29. (1997). LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472. CrossRef | PubMed
30. (1992). SETTLE—an analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 952–962. CrossRef | PubMed
31. (2003). Methodological issues in lipid bilayer simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 107, 9424–9433. PubMed
32. (1997). Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at full hydration, constant pressure, and constant temperature. Biophys. J. 72, 2002–2013. Abstract | | PubMed
33. (2001). GROMACS User Manual Version 3.1.1. (The Netherlands: Groningen). PubMed
34. (1981). Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In Intermolecular Forces. Reidel, D., ed. (The Netherlands: Dordrecht), pp. 331–342. PubMed
35. (1994). Simulation of water transport through a lipid-membrane. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 4155–4168. CrossRef | PubMed
36. (1997). A computer perspective of membranes: molecular dynamics studies of lipid bilayer systems. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1331, 235–270. PubMed
37. (2000). How proteins adapt to a membrane-water interface. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 429–434. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (854 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
38. (2000). Structure of lipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1469, 159–195. PubMed
39. (1995). Restatement of order parameters in biomembranes: calculation of C–C bond order parameters from C-D quadrupolar splittings. Biophys. J. 68, 1727–1739. Abstract | | PubMed
40. (1991). Microscopic versus macroscopic diffusion in one-component fluid phase lipid bilayer membranes. Biophys. J. 60, 1553–1554. | PubMed
41. (1991). Quasielastic neutron scattering measurements of fast local translational diffusion of lipid molecules in phospholipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1063, 67–72. PubMed
42. (2003). Effect of sodium chloride on a lipid bilayer. Biophys. J. 85, 1647–1655. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (616 kb) | PubMed