| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


* Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology,
Department of Chemistry,
Department of Biochemistry, and
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Chad M. Rienstra, E-mail: rienstra{at}scs.uiuc.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helices, which are interrupted by prolines or glycines. Apo A-I has several functions in the pathway of reverse cholesterol transport, where cholesterol is taken up from peripheral tissues and transported to liver for processing and excretion, and to steroidogenic tissue for hormone biosynthesis (3
A model lipid/protein complex representative of nascent discoidal HDL, called the Nanodisc, has recently been developed and characterized by multiple biophysical techniques (10
,11
). The Nanodisc had been engineered as a robust membrane bilayer vehicle for the stoichiometrically controlled incorporation and study of membrane proteins such as cytochrome P450 (12
15
), bacteriorhodopsin (bR) (16
), and G-protein-coupled receptors (17
,18
). In addition, the Nanodisc also represents an excellent model system for studying HDL and the atomic-resolution structure of apo A-I. Nanodiscs are soluble, monodisperse, self-assembled particles, 10 nm in diameter, consisting of two molecules of membrane scaffold protein 1 (MSP1) wrapped around the outside edge of a discoidal bilayer fragment consisting of
160 saturated lipids. MSP1 is a 25 kDa, 200-residue C-terminal lipid-binding domain of apo A-I protein and has the same predicted secondary structure consisting of a sequence of amphipathic helices.
Apo A-I is a dynamic molecule with multiple functions. The mechanisms underlying these functions cannot be understood in detail without additional structural information about each conformational state (19
). A high resolution structure of lipid-free full-length apo A-I has been reported very recently (20
). This structure reveals intramolecular antiparallel helix bundles similar to other lipid-free apolipoproteins. It is remarkably different from the structure of
(1
43
) apo A-I, which contains a ring-shaped four-helix bundle involving four molecules of apo A-I (21
). The structure of apo A-I in lipid-bound form, especially in discoidal HDL, has also been examined extensively by both experimental and computational methods (22
,23
). These studies were motivated by both the fundamental interest in understanding the antiatherogenic function of HDL and the potential value of HDL as therapeutic agents (24
). To date, no high resolution structure of apo A-I in discoidal HDL is available, in part because the heterogeneity of lipid/protein complexes presents significant challenges to x-ray crystallography.
In the absence of single crystal diffraction data, several structural models have been proposed, among which the belt model and the picket fence model are the two most favorable competing models. The main distinguishing feature between these two models is the orientation of the axes of the amphipathic helices with respect to the acyl chains of lipids; they are perpendicular in the belt model and parallel in the picket fence model. Although the low-resolution models were first proposed as early as the 1970s, only recently have all-atom computational models been constructed (25
27
). Fig. 1 shows the schematic representations of these two models. The recently proposed helical hairpin model (28
,29
) is very similar to the belt model except that each apo A-I is bent in the middle to form a hairpin. Various experimental techniques have been employed to gather evidence supporting or disproving these models. The belt model is supported by recent Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (30
), Trp fluorescence quenching (31
), and mass spectrometry studies (32
). On the other hand, results from limited proteolysis experiments (33
) and very recent scanning tunneling microscopy (34
) support the picket fence model.
|
We demonstrate here that the microscopic structural homogeneity of Nanodiscs, precipitated by low molecular weight polyethylene glycol (PEG), is ideal for high-resolution structural studies by SSNMR to determine which model of Nanodisc molecular structure (the belt or the picket fence) agrees best with the experimental data. With modern SSNMR instrumentation, the spectra of uniformly 13C, 15N-labeled MSP1 yield spectral line widths comparable to those observed in microcrystalline globular proteins, such as those we have previously reported (41
). We demonstrate that PEG precipitation and resolubilization does not disassemble the Nanodisc samples and that the sample integrity is maintained for several days to weeks under conditions suitable for NMR analysis. The identification of signals by amino acid type and the interpretation of individual resolved signals in the two-dimensional (2D) 13C-13C correlation spectra validate the MSP1 secondary structure on a site-specific basis. These results strongly support the belt model (26
) over the picket fence model (25
).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For preparation of SSNMR samples, 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) lipids (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) were used in an 80:1 DMPC/MSP1 preparation ratio. The Nanodiscs were prepared in Tris buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH = 7.4) and precipitated using 40% PEG 3350. Samples contained
56 mg/mL of MSP1 in a Nanodisc precipitated with
3 volume equivalents of 40% PEG 3350. The mixture was vortexed lightly and left overnight at 4°C. The samples were then centrifuged for
5 h at 8000 rpm. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was transferred into a 3.2 mm thin wall rotor (Varian NMR, Palo Alto, CA) with working volumes of
36 µL and confined to active sample region (central 30 µL) of the rotor by Kel-F and rubber spacers as described elsewhere (41
). The supernatant contained no observable protein, determined by absorbance at 280 nm. The total mass of the material packed into the rotor was
30 mg. Lipid concentration in the rotor was 2030% by mass, and protein concentration was
1015%, due to the high PEG concentration in the pellet. The amount of protein was determined by comparing the intensity of one-dimensional (1D) 13C and 15N spectra to standard proteins of known quantity.
To test the integrity of the precipitated Nanodiscs, a sample was prepared with natural abundance MSP1 and subjected to the exact precipitation treatment as the isotopically labeled Nanodiscs prepared for SSNMR before placement into a rotor. The PEG supernatant was removed, and the precipitated pellet was resuspended in 125 µl of standard buffer. Water was added further in small aliquots until the sample appeared to be visually clear, resulting in a final volume of 325 µl. The sample was then injected onto the Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), with the column, injection volume, and the flow rate kept constant throughout the experiment. From the first injection of the resuspended sample, fractions 2427 were collected and pooled together and reinjected onto the column. The sample initially resuspended in 325 µl was diluted further by addition of more water, and an aliquot of this was injected onto the column. With the exception of slight shifts in the retention time attributable to the presence of PEG, the precipitated and resolubilized Nanodisc samples showed the same behavior as freshly prepared Nanodiscs (data in Supplementary Material).
SSNMR spectroscopy
SSNMR experiments were performed on Varian NMR spectrometers. The 750 MHz Inova three-channel spectrometer is equipped with a 3.2 mm 1H-13C-15N BioMAS probe (46
) and the 500 MHz InfinityPlus four-channel spectrometer with a 3.2 mm 1H-13C-15N Balun probe. The temperature of the sample cooling gas was maintained at 10.0 ± 0.2°C with 100 scfh flow rate for all the 2D experiments; the effective offset in temperature due to friction, radiofrequency heating (46
), and thermocouple calibration results in an absolute sample temperature of
10°C ± 5°C in this case, although there is not yet any well-established technique for measuring this absolute temperature internally. Therefore we report the temperature of the cooling gas for comparison throughout this study. The temperature was chosen based on consideration of both the spectral resolution (discussed below) and sample stability. For experiments at 750 MHz, pulse sequences were implemented with tangent ramped cross-polarization (CP) (47
) at
55 kHz on 1H and
45 kHz on 13C and two pulse phase modulation (TPPM) 1H decoupling (48
) at 78 kHz. The typical
/2 pulse widths are 2.5 µs on 1H and 3.5 µs on 13C. For experiments at 500 MHz, the 13C field for CP is
45 kHz and 1H field for TPPM decoupling is 70 kHz. The typical
/2 pulse widths are 2.5 µs on 1H and 3.0 µs on 13C.
Data were processed with NMRPipe (49
) with back linear prediction and polynomial baseline (frequency domain) correction applied to the direct dimension. Zero filling and Lorentzian-to-Gaussian apodization were employed for each dimension before Fourier transformation. Additional acquisition and processing parameters for each spectrum are included in the figure captions. Chemical shifts were referenced externally with adamantane (50
).
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
2-fold, and the (1H)-15N-13C specific CP (52
40%. These values are comparable to the best performance observed in well-behaved globular proteins (41
2D 13C-13C correlation spectra
The 2D 13C-13C homonuclear correlation spectra allow for identification of spins in the same residue. Each identified group of spins, i.e., spin system, can be assigned to specific type(s) of amino acid residues according to their characteristic 13C chemical shifts (53
). Fig. 4 A shows the 2D 13C-13C homonuclear correlation spectrum of uniformly 13C, 15N-labeled MSP1 in Nanodiscs acquired at 750 MHz 1H frequency with 50 ms dipolar-assisted rotational resonance (DARR) mixing time (54
) . For many of the unambiguously identifiable amino acid spin systems in our spectra (Ala, Val, Glu, Pro, Ser, Thr, and Gly), signals with helical secondary chemical shifts (55
57
) dominate the overall intensity. Ala, Gly, Ser, and Thr are prominent examples. The Ala chemical shift range could be identified from the C
-Cß crosspeaks (Fig. 4, A and B): 53.856.5 ppm for C
and 17.519.5 ppm for Cß. These values are consistent with Ala chemical shifts in a helical secondary structure. A few peaks can be observed that deviate from the rest of the Ala spin systems and have C
values shifted upfield to 52.553.5 ppm. In particular, an individual Ala can be identified at C
of 52.9 ppm and Cß of 19.3 ppm.
This chemical shift is more characteristic of an Ala in a coiled secondary structure (although its line width is comparable to other individual peaks, indicating a specific preferred conformation). Several Ala residues in the MSP1 sequencesuch as Ala-121, Ala-164, and Ala-167are in a vicinity of a helix break, or possibly a kink, and the observed signal could correspond to one of these Ala not in a helical conformation. In particular, Ala-121 precedes a Pro residue, which would have an effect on its conformation resulting in an upfield shift of C
(58
). Other regions of interest include the Gly C
-C' and Thr and Ser C
-Cß crosspeaks (Fig. 4, A and B). Several individual Gly residues can be identified, and they all have the C
chemical shift in the range between 47.1 and 48.5 ppm, and C' in the range between 174.5 and 177.5 ppm, again consistent with the expected C
chemical shifts for Gly in a helical secondary structure. The proximity of C
-Cß crosspeaks of Ser and Thr to the diagonal is another unambiguous indication of helical secondary structure. Overall, our analysis indicates that MSP1 is predominantly helical, which is consistent with the reported 80% helical content of apo A-I in discoidal HDL (59
).
|
510 Å), comparable to observations for nanocrystalline proteins such as ubiquitin (39
|
- and
-angles and can be found predominantly in one of the two regions in Ramachandran space, with a common allowed
-angle of
60° and two ranges of
-angles with middle values of
45° and
135° (64
- and
-angles of prolines in the crystal structures of these proteins and their SSNMR 13C chemical shifts. All of the backbone torsion angles fall into one of the two energetically favorable regions and an obvious pattern emerges where high positive
-values (within one allowed region) result in C
chemical shifts that are shifted upfield to 6162 ppm, whereas negative
-angle values (prolines in the other allowed region) result in downfield shifted C
values of
6566 ppm. This is consistent with the general trend of C
chemical shifts as a function of secondary structure, whereas Cß, C
, and C
chemical shifts do not appear to be sensitive to differences in the backbone conformation of proline, instead depending more upon ring conformation. Thus the C
chemical shift analysis is most informative with respect to the backbone conformation. The chemical shifts of individual proline peaks, as well as the chemical shift range of the more congested proline regions (C
between
65.3 and 66.8 ppm), are all consistent with prolines with
-angles close to zero.
|
-angles in the two picket fence models where prolines are found in ß-turns between helices. The dihedral angle values (
0) indicative of observed chemical shifts (65.566.5 ppm) of proline in MSP1 in a Nanodisc are consistent with those found in the double belt model and do not agree at all with those that would be expected for prolines in the picket fence models. Since the proline residues are the key conformational difference between the picket fence and the belt model, this result strongly supports the belt model and contradicts any model in which prolines are in ß-turn conformations. It is possible, but unlikely, that a single hairpin could be formed without a proline in a ß-turn conformation; therefore it is not possible to rule out all possible hairpin models.
|
-angles of all prolines remain close to zero during the entire trajectory, which demonstrates the extremely high-energy barrier for prolines to undergo a conformational change within the Nanodisc. Similarly, the transition of individual proline from one favorable conformation to the other has been observed for neither the head-to-head nor the head-to-tail picket fence models, indicating the stability of both models. Most prolines remain to be in the conformation with large positive
-angles in the entire trajectory. Therefore, the relative orientation of helices appears to dictate the conformation of prolines in each model. The fact that only prolines with one favorable conformation (
close to zero) are observed in our experimental spectra strongly supports the belt model as the correct model of MSP1 in Nanodiscs.
|
and Cß chemical shifts depend on both the amino acid type and on the backbone conformation (58
and Cß shifts (0.98 and 0.996 correlation coefficients, respectively) (68
and Cß shifts with the experimental 2D 13C-13C spectra. A similar method was utilized by Baldus and co-workers in a different context (69
and Cß (0.9606 and 0.9947, respectively) SSNMR chemical shifts in three model proteins: SH3, ubiquitin, and Crh.
To compare the simulated and experimental spectra, a 2D 13C-13C chemical shift correlation spectrum with polarization transferred by SPC-5 recoupling scheme (70
) was acquired (Fig. 7 A). In this spectrum, the mixing time was chosen to ensure that crosspeaks result only from one-bond correlations, enabling C
-Cß crosspeaks to be unambiguously identified. Fig. 7, B and C, shows two examples of the overlaid experimental and simulated spectra for the belt model (Fig. 7 B) and one of the picket fence models with head-to-head alignment (Fig. 7 C). Besides the aforementioned differences in Pro signals, clear variations are also observed in the Ser, Thr, and Ala regions. For the picket fence model shown, several Ser and Thr C
-Cß crosspeaks deviate far from the diagonal in the simulated spectra, clearly indicating nonhelical conformations; these features are not observed in the experimental spectra. In the Ala C
-Cß crosspeak region, multiple predicted crosspeaks from the head-to-head picket fence model fail to overlap with the experimental data. Likewise in the Leu, Asp, and Asn C
-Cß crosspeak regionsalthough for both models shown there are signals in the simulated spectra that do not agree perfectly with experimental datathe deviations are substantially more significant for the picket fence model.
|
noise floor were counted for each model. The uncertainty of ±0.5 ppm was used for both C
and Cß predicted chemical shifts. Because helical Ser and Thr crosspeaks are close to the diagonal and generally obscured by the strong diagonal peaks, they were excluded from the quantitative comparison. The Thr and Ser C
and Cß chemical shifts can instead be observed in 2D double quantum/zero quantum 13C-13C correlation spectra in which diagonal peaks do not exist (shown in the Supplementary Material). Gly was also excluded because of the lack of a Cß atom. The results are summarized in Table 3. In all molecular models, at least 70% of the MSP1 residues are helical and therefore should have very similar chemical shifts. A smaller number of residues differ among the models; these differences correspond to those key residues that have multiple energetically allowed secondary structures, which in turn are the important determinants of the relative orientation of adjacent helices. We find that overall agreement between the experimental data and the belt model is best, consistent with the detailed analysis of proline residues as presented above.
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NMR data verify that MSP1 maintains its predominantly helical conformation in PEG-precipitated Nanodiscs. In particular, the proline C
chemical shifts provide useful structural constraints. The experimentally determined proline backbone conformations are in complete agreement with those in the belt model but disagree with the majority of those in the picket fence model. This conclusion is further supported by empirical comparisons of the chemical shifts among the majority of C
and Cß sites in MSP1 and is also consistent with the results from molecular dynamics simulations, which show that the arrangement of helices in the picket fence model does not energetically favor the proline conformations observed from experimental spectra. The results therefore support the belt model for Nanodisc structure.
| SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This research was supported by the University of Illinois startup funds to C.M.R. and the National Institutes of Health GM33775 grant to S.G.S.
Submitted on April 12, 2006; accepted for publication July 18, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Asztalos, B. F., L. A. Cupples, S. Demissie, K. V. Horvath, C. E. Cox, M. C. Batista, and E. J. Schaefer. 2004. High-density lipoprotein subpopulation profile and coronary heart disease prevalence in male participants of the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24:21812187.
3. Glomset, J. A. 1968. The plasma lecithins:cholesterol acyltransferase reaction. J. Lipid Res. 9:155167.[Abstract]
4. Fielding, C. J., and P. E. Fielding. 1995. Molecular physiology of reverse cholesterol transport. J. Lipid Res. 36:211228.[Abstract]
5. Barter, P. J., and K. A. Rye. 1996. Molecular mechanisms of reverse cholesterol transport. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 7:8287.[Medline]
6. Colvin, P. L., and J. S. Parks. 1999. Metabolism of high density lipoprotein subfractions. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 10:309314.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Jonas, A. 2000. Lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1529:245256.[Medline]
8. Krieger, M. 1999. Charting the fate of the "good cholesterol": identification and characterization of the high-density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68:523558.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Segrest, J. P., S. C. Harvey, and V. Zannis. 2000. Detailed molecular model of apolipoprotein A-I on the surface of high-density lipoproteins and its functional implications. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 10:246252.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Bayburt, T. H., Y. V. Grinkova, and S. G. Sligar. 2002. Self-assembly of discoidal phospholipid bilayer nanoparticles with membrane scaffold proteins. Nano Lett. 2:853856.[CrossRef]
11. Denisov, I. G., Y. V. Grinkova, A. A. Lazarides, and S. G. Sligar. 2004. Directed self-assembly of monodisperse phospholipid bilayer Nanodiscs with controlled size. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:34773487.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Baas, B. J., I. G. Denisov, and S. G. Sligar. 2004. Homotropic cooperativity of monomeric cytochrome P450 3A4 in a nanoscale native bilayer environment. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 430:218228.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Bayburt, T. H., and S. G. Sligar. 2002. Single-molecule height measurements on microsomal cytochrome P450 in nanometer-scale phospholipid bilayer disks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:67256730.
14. Civjan, N. R., T. H. Bayburt, M. A. Schuler, and S. G. Sligar. 2003. Direct solubilization of heterologously expressed membrane proteins by incorporation into nanoscale lipid bilayers. Biotechniques. 35:556560, 562553.[Medline]
15. Duan, H., N. R. Civjan, S. G. Sligar, and M. A. Schuler. 2004. Co-incorporation of heterologously expressed Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 and P450 reductase into soluble nanoscale lipid bilayers. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 424:141153.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Bayburt, T. H., Y. V. Grinkova, and S. G. Sligar. 2006. Assembly of single bacteriorhodopsin trimers in bilayer Nanodiscs. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 450:215222.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Bayburt, T. H., and S. G. Sligar. 2003. Self-assembly of single integral membrane proteins into soluble nanoscale phospholipid bilayers. Protein Sci. 12:24762481.
18. Leitz, A. J., T. H. Bayburt, A. N. Barnakov, B. A. Springer, and S. G. Sligar. 2006. Functional reconstitution of beta2-adrenergic receptors utilizing self-assembling Nanodisc technology. Biotechniques. 40:601612.[Medline]
19. Frank, P. G., and Y. L. Marcel. 2000. Apolipoprotein A-I: structure-function relationships. J. Lipid Res. 41:853872.
20. Ajees, A. A., G. M. Anantharamaiah, V. K. Mishra, M. M. Hussain, and H. M. Murthy. 2006. Crystal structure of human apolipoprotein A-I: insights into its protective effect against cardiovascular diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:21262131.
21. Borhani, D. W., D. P. Rogers, J. A. Engler, and C. G. Brouillette. 1997. Crystal structure of truncated human apolipoprotein A-I suggests a lipid-bound conformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1229112296.
22. Koppaka, V. 2001. Structural studies of discoidal lipoprotein A-I. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58:885893.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Brouillette, C. G., G. M. Anantharamaiah, J. A. Engler, and D. W. Borhani. 2001. Structural models of human apolipoprotein A-I: a critical analysis and review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1531:446.[Medline]
24. Nissen, S. E., T. Tsunoda, E. M. Tuzcu, P. Schoenhagen, C. J. Cooper, M. Yasin, G. M. Eaton, M. A. Lauer, W. S. Sheldon, C. L. Grines, S. Halpern, T. Crowe, J. C. Blankenship, and R. Kerensky. 2003. Effect of recombinant ApoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 290:22922300.
25. Phillips, J. C., W. Wriggers, Z. Li, A. Jonas, and K. Schulten. 1997. Predicting the structure of apolipoprotein A-I in reconstituted high-density lipoprotein disks. Biophys. J. 73:23372346.
26. Segrest, J. P., M. K. Jones, A. E. Klon, C. J. Sheldahl, M. Hellinger, H. De Loof, and S. C. Harvey. 1999. A detailed molecular belt model for apolipoprotein A-I in discoidal high density lipoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 274:3175531758.
27. Shih, A. Y., I. G. Denisov, J. C. Phillips, S. G. Sligar, and K. Schulten. 2005. Molecular dynamics simulations of discoidal bilayers assembled from truncated human lipoproteins. Biophys. J. 88:548556.
28. Rogers, D. P., L. M. Roberts, J. Lebowitz, G. Datta, G. M. Anantharamaiah, J. A. Engler, and C. G. Brouillette. 1998. The lipid-free structure of apolipoprotein A-I: effects of amino-terminal deletions. Biochemistry. 37:1171411725.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Maiorano, J. N., R. J. Jandacek, E. M. Horace, and W. S. Davidson. 2004. Identification and structural ramifications of a hinge domain in apolipoprotein A-I discoidal high-density lipoproteins of different size. Biochemistry. 43:1171711726.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Koppaka, V., L. Silvestro, J. A. Engler, C. G. Brouillette, and P. H. Axelsen. 1999. The structure of human lipoprotein A-Ievidence for the "belt" model. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1454114544.
31. Panagotopulos, S. E., E. M. Horace, J. N. Maiorano, and W. S. Davidson. 2001. Apolipoprotein A-I adopts a belt-like orientation in reconstituted high density lipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 276:4296542970.
32. Silva, R. A., G. M. Hilliard, L. Li, J. P. Segrest, and W. S. Davidson. 2005. A mass spectrometric determination of the conformation of dimeric apolipoprotein A-I in discoidal high density lipoproteins. Biochemistry. 44:86008607.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Lins, L., S. Piron, K. Conrath, B. Vanloo, R. Brasseur, M. Rosseneu, J. Baert, and J. M. Ruysschaert. 1993. Enzymatic hydrolysis of reconstituted dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine-apo A-I complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1151:137142.[Medline]
34. Culot, C., F. Durant, S. Lazarescu, P. A. Thiry, B. Vanloo, M. Y. Rosseneu, L. Lins, and R. Brasseur. 2004. Structural investigation of reconstituted high density lipoproteins by scanning tunnelling microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 230:151157.[CrossRef]
35. Mishra, V. K., G. M. Anantharamaiah, J. P. Segrest, M. N. Palgunachari, M. Chaddha, S. W. Sham, and N. R. Krishna. 2006. Association of a model class A (apolipoprotein) amphipathic alpha helical peptide with lipid: high resolution NMR studies of peptide.lipid discoidal complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 281:65116519.
36. Opella, S. J., and F. M. Marassi. 2004. Structure determination of membrane proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 104:35873606.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Griffin, R. G. 1998. Dipolar recoupling in MAS spectra of biological solids. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:508512.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Pauli, J., M. Baldus, B. van Rossum, H. de Groot, and H. Oschkinat. 2001. Backbone and side-chain 13C and 15N resonance assignments of the alpha-spectrin SH3 domain by magic angle spinning solid state NMR at 17.6 Tesla. Chembiochem. 2:272281.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Igumenova, T. I., A. E. McDermott, K. W. Zilm, R. W. Martin, E. K. Paulson, and A. J. Wand. 2004. Assignments of carbon NMR resonances for microcrystalline ubiquitin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:67206727.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Igumenova, T. I., A. J. Wand, and A. E. McDermott. 2004. Assignment of the backbone resonances for microcrystalline ubiquitin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:53235331.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Franks, W. T., D. H. Zhou, B. J. Wylie, B. G. Money, D. T. Graesser, H. L. Frericks, G. Sahota, and C. M. Rienstra. 2005. Magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy of the beta1 immunoglobulin binding domain of protein G (GB1): 15N and 13C chemical shift assignments and conformational analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:1229112305.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Bockmann, A., A. Lange, A. Galinier, S. Luca, N. Giraud, M. Juy, H. Heise, R. Montserret, F. Penin, and M. Baldus. 2003. Solid state NMR sequential resonance assignments and conformational analysis of the 2 x 10.4 kDa dimeric form of the Bacillus subtilis protein Crh. J. Biomol. NMR. 27:323339.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Egorova-Zachernyuk, T. A., J. Hollander, N. Fraser, P. Gast, A. J. Hoff, R. Cogdell, H. J. M. de Groot, and M. Baldus. 2001. Heteronuclear 2D-correlations in a uniformly [C-13, N-15] labeled membrane-protein complex at ultra-high magnetic fields. J. Biomol. NMR. 19:243253.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Gammeren, A. J., F. B. Hulsbergen, J. G. Hollander, and H. J. Groot. 2005. Residual backbone and side-chain 13C and 15N resonance assignments of the intrinsic transmembrane light-harvesting 2 protein complex by solid-state magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR. 31:279293.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Holdeman, T. C., and K. H. Gardner. 2001. Letter to the Editor: H-1, C-13 and N-15 chemical shift assignments of the N-terminal PAS domain of mNPAS2. J. Biomol. NMR. 21:383384.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Stringer, J. A., C. E. Bronnimann, C. G. Mullen, D. H. Zhou, S. A. Stellfox, Y. Li, E. H. Williams, and C. M. Rienstra. 2005. Reduction of RF-induced sample heating with a scroll coil resonator structure for solid-state NMR probes. J. Magn. Reson. 173:4048.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Hediger, S., B. H. Meier, N. D. Kurur, G. Bodenhausen, and R. R. Ernst. 1994. NMR cross-polarization by adiabatic passage through the Hartmann-Hahn condition (APHH). Chem. Phys. Lett. 223:283288.[CrossRef]
48. Bennett, A. E., C. M. Rienstra, M. Auger, K. V. Lakshmi, and R. G. Griffin. 1995. Heteronuclear decoupling in rotating solids. J. Chem. Phys. 103:69516958.[CrossRef]
49. Delaglio, F., S. Grzesiek, G. W. Vuister, G. Zhu, J. Pfeifer, and A. Bax. 1995. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR. 6:277293.[Medline]
50. Morcombe, C. R., and K. W. Zilm. 2003. Chemical shift referencing in MAS solid state NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 162:479486.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Martin, R. W., and K. W. Zilm. 2003. Preparation of protein nanocrystals and their characterization by solid state NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 165:162174.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Baldus, M., A. T. Petkova, J. Herzfeld, and R. G. Griffin. 1998. Cross polarization in the tilted frame: assignment and spectral simplification in heteronuclear spin systems. Mol. Phys. 95:11971207.[CrossRef]
53. BioMagResBank. http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu.
54. Takegoshi, K., S. Nakamura, and T. Terao. 2001. C-13-H-1 dipolar-assisted rotational resonance in magic-angle spinning NMR. Chem. Phys. Lett. 344:631637.[CrossRef]
55. Wishart, D. S., and B. D. Sykes. 1994. The 13C chemical-shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical-shift data. J. Biomol. NMR. 4:171180.[Medline]
56. Cornilescu, G., F. Delaglio, and A. Bax. 1999. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR. 13:289302.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Luca, S., D. V. Filippov, J. H. van Boom, H. Oschkinat, H. J. de Groot, and M. Baldus. 2001. Secondary chemical shifts in immobilized peptides and proteins: a qualitative basis for structure refinement under magic angle spinning. J. Biomol. NMR. 20:325331.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Iwadate, M., T. Asakura, and M. P. Williamson. 1999. C alpha and C beta carbon-13 chemical shifts in proteins from an empirical database. J. Biomol. NMR. 13:199211.[CrossRef][Medline]
59. Li, L., J. Chen, V. K. Mishra, J. A. Kurtz, D. Cao, A. E. Klon, S. C. Harvey, G. M. Anantharamaiah, and J. P. Segrest. 2004. Double belt structure of discoidal high density lipoproteins: molecular basis for size heterogeneity. J. Mol. Biol. 343:12931311.[CrossRef][Medline]
60. Lorch, M., S. Fahem, C. Kaiser, I. Weber, A. J. Mason, J. U. Bowie, and C. Glaubitz. 2005. How to prepare membrane proteins for solid-state NMR: a case study on the alpha-helical integral membrane protein diacylglycerol kinase from E. coli. ChemBioChem. 6:16931700.[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Rogers, D. P., L. M. Roberts, J. Lebowitz, J. A. Engler, and C. G. Brouillette. 1998. Structural analysis of apolipoprotein A-I: effects of amino- and carboxy-terminal deletions on the lipid-free structure. Biochemistry. 37:945955.[CrossRef][Medline]
62. Brouillette, C. G., and G. M. Anantharamaiah. 1995. Structural models of human apolipoprotein A-I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1256:103129.[Medline]
63. Klon, A. E., J. P. Segrest, and S. C. Harvey. 2002. Comparative models for human apolipoprotein A-I bound to lipid in discoidal high-density lipoprotein particles. Biochemistry. 41:1089510905.[CrossRef][Medline]
64. Lovell, S. C., I. W. Davis, W. B. Arendall 3rd, P. I. de Bakker, J. M. Word, M. G. Prisant, J. S. Richardson, and D. C. Richardson. 2003. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi, psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins. 50:437450.