help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on July 7, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.086645
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.086645v1
91/8/2991    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borucki, B.
Right arrow Articles by Heyn, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borucki, B.
Right arrow Articles by Heyn, M. P.
Biophysical Journal 91:2991-3001 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

The Transient Accumulation of the Signaling State of Photoactive Yellow Protein Is Controlled by the External pH

Berthold Borucki *, Chandra P. Joshi *, Harald Otto *, Michael A. Cusanovich {dagger} and Maarten P. Heyn *

* Biophysics Group, Department of Physics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany; and {dagger} Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Maarten P. Heyn, Biophysics Group, Dept. of Physics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany. Tel: 49-30-83856160; Fax: 49-30-83856299; E-mail: heyn{at}physik.fu-berlin.de.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The signaling state of the photoreceptor photoactive yellow protein is the long-lived intermediate I2'. The pH dependence of the equilibrium between the transient photocycle intermediates I2 and I2' was investigated. The formation of I2' from I2 is accompanied by a major conformational change. The kinetics and intermediates of the photocycle and of the photoreversal were measured by transient absorption spectroscopy from pH 4.6 to 8.4. Singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis of the data at pH 7 showed the presence of three spectrally distinguishable species: I1, I2, and I2'. Their spectra were determined using the extrapolated difference method. I2 and I2' have electronic absorption spectra, with maxima at 370 ± 5 and 350 ± 5 nm, respectively. Formation of the signaling state is thus associated with a change in the environment of the protonated chromophore. The time courses of the I1, I2, and I2' intermediates were determined from the wavelength-dependent transient absorbance changes at each pH, assuming that their spectra are pH-independent. After the formation of I2' (~2 ms), these three intermediates are in equilibrium and decay together to the initial dark state. The equilibrium between I2 and I2' is pH dependent with a pKa of 6.4 and with I2' the main species above this pKa. Measurements of the pH dependence of the photoreversal kinetics with a second flash of 355 nm at a delay of 20 ms confirm this pKa value. I2 and I2' are photoreversed with reversal times of ~55 µs and several hundred microseconds, respectively. The corresponding signal amplitudes are pH dependent with a pKa of ~6.1. Photoreversal from I2' dominates above the pKa. The transient accumulation of I2', the active state of photoactive yellow protein, is thus controlled by the proton concentration. The rate constant k3 for the recovery to the initial dark state also has a pKa of ~6.3. This equality of the equilibrium and kinetic pKa values is not accidental and suggests that k3 is proportional to [I2'].


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Photoactive yellow protein (PYP) is significant as the structural prototype for a large and diverse superfamily of signaling proteins that share a common structural motif termed the PAS domain (1Go,2Go). PAS domains are found in all kingdoms of life, generally as the sensory component of multi-domain proteins. The structure of PYP has a central six-stranded antiparallel ß-sheet, with four structural features: an N-terminal cap, a PAS core with the first three ß-strands of the central ß-sheet, a helical connector, and a so-called ß-scaffold consisting of the last three ß-strands (3Go–7Go). PYP from the halophilic purple phototrophic bacterium Halorhodospira halophila is a small 14-kDa soluble cytoplasmic protein. The physiological function of H. halophila PYP was reported to be in negative phototaxis, resulting in movement away from blue/UV light (8Go). Its chromophore is p-hydroxycinnamic acid covalently bound via a thioester linkage to cysteine-69. In the dark, the phenol group of the chromophore is deprotonated, and the C7=C8 bond is trans. The ionization of the chromophore and its hydrogen bonding to E-46 and Y-42 are mainly responsible for the observed spectral tuning in the dark state ({lambda}max {approx} 446 nm). Light-induced transcis isomerization around the C7=C8 bond is rapid (<3 ps) and is followed by a sequence of slower relaxations in the dark that ultimately lead to recovery of the dark state in less than 1 s. This photocycle has already been studied in considerable detail (9Go–11Go). The first long-lived intermediate, after the two very short-lived intermediates I0 and Formula is I1. I1 forms in ~3 ns and has a red-shifted absorption spectrum ({lambda}max {approx} 460 nm). In several hundred microseconds it decays to I2. I2 has a protonated chromophore and a blue-shifted absorption spectrum that is commonly believed to have its {lambda}max value at 355 nm. In I2 the chromophore phenol is partially exposed to the aqueous medium and hydrogen-bonded to the side chain of R-52 (6Go). The protonation of the chromophore occurs either intramolecularly from E-46 (12Go) or from the external medium (13Go). In several milliseconds I2 is transformed into I2'. I2' is believed to be the signaling state. It also has a protonated chromophore with a {lambda}max value similar to that of I2. The I2 to I2' transition is associated with a major global structural change, which has been documented by NMR (14Go,15Go), CD (16Go), small-angle x-ray scattering (17Go), and FTIR (12Go,18Go). Formation of I2' is associated with exposure of a hydrophobic surface patch (19Go), presumably the recognition and binding site for a response regulator. Experiments with hydrophobic dyes showed that these bind transiently to I2' but not to I2 (13Go). PYP shares a number of features, such as spectral tuning, photoisomerization, transient chromophore (de)protonation, and photoreversal, with other photoreceptors such as rhodopsin and phytochrome. This together with the availability of high-resolution structures of intermediates (3Go–7Go) makes PYP an attractive model system for signal transduction (1Go).

For an understanding of the mechanism of PYP, a detailed characterization of its photocycle is essential. Such studies have been carried out by both electronic (9Go–11Go,20Go) and vibrational (21Go,22Go) spectroscopy. The photocycle kinetics are pH (23Go–25Go) and salt (26Go,27Go) dependent. Whereas early models assumed a unidirectional sequential mechanism (9Go,20Go), it is becoming increasingly clear that back reactions and equilibria between intermediates play essential roles (11Go,24Go,25Go,28Go). These equilibria are also pH (24Go–26Go,28Go–30Go) and salt dependent (26Go). An example of the pH- and salt-dependent equilibrium between I1 and I2/I2' was recently described for the mutant Y98Q (26Go). At alkaline pH, the I1'and I2' intermediates are in equilibrium with a pKa of ~9.9 (25Go,28Go). Most photocycle intermediates can be photoreversed when excited with light of the appropriate wavelength at the right time (31Go–33Go). Using this double-flash method, we showed that the I2 and I2' intermediates are in equilibrium (33Go). I2 partly decays to I2' in ~2 ms and then remains in equilibrium with I2' until the end of the cycle (33Go). Our laboratory showed from time-resolved fluorescence and photostationary absorption measurements that this I2/I2' equilibrium is pH dependent with a pKa of 6.3 (34Go). Interestingly the rate constant for the kinetics of the ground state recovery has a bell-shaped pH dependence with a lower pKa of 6.4 (23Go), i.e., identical to the value for the I2/I2' equilibrium (34Go). The nature of the group(s) responsible for this pKa is still not entirely certain, but it is commonly ascribed to E-46 (35Go,36Go).

The I2 and I2' intermediates were originally characterized by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy (12Go,18Go), but they can also be distinguished by transient absorption spectroscopy in the UV/visible. Indeed, our laboratory recently obtained {lambda}max values of 372 and 352 nm for I2 and I2', respectively, from measurements of the pH dependence of the photostationary absorbance in the presence of background illumination (34Go). Here we characterize the equilibrium and spectra of the I2 and I2' intermediates by kinetic methods using transient absorption spectroscopy in the UV/visible and the extrapolated difference method (37Go). These methods allow a direct determination of the time-dependent intermediate populations and their pH dependencies. We find that the transient accumulation of the signaling state (I2') increases with pH with a pKa of ~6.4.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Protein production and purification
H. halophila holo-PYP was produced by coexpression with the biosynthetic enzymes TAL and pCL and subsequently purified from Escherichia coli BL 21 (DE3) as described (38Go).

Transient absorption spectroscopy
Time-resolved absorption spectroscopy with single- and double-flash excitation was performed as described (13Go,24Go,33Go,39Go). To resolve the photoreversal kinetics, the data acquisition was triggered on the second flash (33Go,39Go). SVD methods were used as described (13Go,24Go,40Go–42Go).

Data analysis
Spectra and time courses of intermediates were obtained using the extrapolated difference method as described (25Go,37Go). The transient absorbance change {Delta}A ({lambda}, t) is given by a sum of contributions from the spectral intermediates i, whose relative concentration is given by ni(t). In matrix notation:

Formula 1(1)
where the columns of A are the spectra of intermediates and each of the identical columns of Ap is the spectrum of the dark state P. Assuming first-order kinetics, {Delta}A can be represented by a sum of exponentials. The wavelength-dependent coefficients of the exponentials are the amplitude spectra Bi({lambda}). The Bi({lambda}) are given in matrix notation by:

Formula 2(2)
where Cij is the weight of the jth exponential in the time dependence of ni(t).

The amplitude spectra are ordered from low to high apparent time constants in the matrix B. New matrices Formula 2 and Formula 2 are formed from the columns of B and C by adding up columns (25Go,37Go). The columns of Formula 2 represent the extrapolated absorption difference spectra; the columns of Formula 2 contain the relative contributions of the intermediates in these difference spectra. In the case of PYP at acid and neutral pH, only three intermediates contribute, as we will see, in the time range investigated: I1, I2, and I2'. Their relative contributions to the ith extrapolated absorption difference spectrum will be called (xi, yi, zi) in the order I1, I2, I2'.

The intermediate spectrum (A)i can then be calculated from column i of matrix Formula 2

Formula 3(3)
To calculate the elements of Formula 3 the following two constraints are introduced:

  1. The sum of the relative intermediate concentrations of I1, I2, and I2' in the extrapolated difference spectra is constant at all times before ground state recovery and equals the fraction of molecules cycling, {eta}. This means that the sum of x, y, and z for each extrapolated difference spectrum equals {eta} or that the sum of the matrix elements of each column of Formula 3 equals {eta}, and that of Formula 3 is 1/{eta}. This is simply the conservation law for the number of cycling molecules in a sequential cycle.
  2. The absorption of I2' is identical to zero for wavelengths larger than or equal to 410 nm. I2' has its absorption maximum for the longest wavelength S0-S1 transition around 355 nm. Because the spectra of all intermediates have similar bandwidths, we can estimate from the spectrum of P, which does not absorb beyond 500 nm, that I2' does not absorb beyond 410 nm.

Matrix calculations were performed with Matlab version R12.1. Fits with sum of exponentials were carried out with Microcal Origin 7.5.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Spectra and time courses of intermediates at pH 7: extrapolated difference method
Transient absorbance changes were measured at 19 wavelengths, ranging from 330 to 510 nm, in the time domain from 50 ns to 5 s. Fig. 1 A shows data at pH 7. For clarity, time traces at only eight wavelengths are shown. The complete data set was subjected to SVD analysis. The first six singular values were 11.2, 1.8, 0.14, 0.05, 0.03, and 0.02. We consider the first three to be significant, suggesting the presence of only three spectrally distinguishable intermediates. The additional components (s4, s5, and s6) show very noisy time traces and were therefore neglected. The three weighted time traces from SVD were fitted simultaneously starting at 10 µs with a sum of three exponentials with time constants {tau}1 = 270 µs, {tau}2 = 2.0 ms, and {tau}3 = 260 ms. These times are marked by vertical dashed lines in Fig. 1 A. The dotted lines in Fig. 1 A, which can barely be distinguished from the data, represent these fit curves for the individual time traces. From the fit to the SVD time traces and the corresponding basis spectra, the amplitude spectra Bj({lambda}) were calculated as described (42Go). These are presented in Fig. 1 B. The amplitude spectra provide considerable insight into the spectra of the intermediates. B1({lambda}) clearly describes the transition from I1 ({lambda}max {approx} 460 nm) to I2 with a {lambda}max value above 360 nm. B2({lambda}) is apparently a transition from an equilibrium of I1 and I2 to I2' with I2' blue-shifted with respect to I2. B3({lambda}) represents the ground state recovery and suggests that I2' has its {lambda}max value near 350 nm. Comparison of the negative minimum of B1 with the positive maximum of B3 suggests that the transition from I2 to I2' is associated with a blue shift of the order of ~20 nm. So qualitatively the conclusion that there is a blue shift between the early UV intermediate I2 and the later UV intermediate I2' is already apparent from the data alone (amplitude spectra) without any model-dependent assumptions. The following quantitative analysis, which does use two plausible constraints, strengthens this conclusion.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1  (A) Transient absorption changes after excitation at 430 nm at 19 wavelengths varying from 330 to 510 nm. For clarity, only the traces at the indicated wavelengths are shown. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time constants for a global fit to the weighted SVD time traces with a sum of three exponentials. {tau}1 = 270 µs is the rise time of I2, {tau}2 = 2.0 ms is the rise time of I2', and {tau}3 = 260 ms is the return to P. The dotted lines, only distinguishable from the data in the microsecond time range, are the fits. Conditions: pH 7, 20°C, 50 mM KCl, and 50 mM Tris. PYP concentration 35 µM. (B) Amplitude spectra Bi({lambda}) calculated from the amplitudes of the exponential fits to the SVD time traces and the corresponding basis spectra of the data in A. The three amplitude spectra correspond to the following time constants: {tau}1 = 270 µs (•), {tau}2 = 2.0 ms ({square}), {tau}3 = 260 ms ({circ}). The solid curve is a scaled and inverted ground-state spectrum. (C) Extrapolated difference spectra obtained from the amplitude spectra of B as described in the text: Formula 31 ({blacktriangleup}), Formula 32 ({diamond}), and Formula 33 ({circ}).

 
We recently described in detail how to construct the intermediate spectra and time courses from the B spectra using the extrapolated difference method (25Go,37Go). The main equations were briefly summarized in Materials and Methods. The three amplitude spectra B1, B2, and B3 were used to construct the Formula 3 matrix as described (25Go,37Go). The three columns, Formula 31, Formula 32, and Formula 33, representing the extrapolated difference spectra are presented in Fig. 1 C. Formula 31 equals the initial absorbance change right after the flash and suggests that the initial bleach led to the formation of the I1 intermediate (positive absorbance change near 480 nm).

We now use the second constraint as described in Materials and Methods, that I2' does not absorb beyond 410 nm, and consider Eq. 3 only in the range {lambda} > 410 nm; i.e., we drop the rows for the shorter wavelengths. Then the third column of the reduced matrix A, corresponding to the spectrum of I2', is the null vector: (A)3 =Formula 3. Because (A)3 is zero, we can solve Eq. 3 for (Formula 3–1)3. In this way, we determine the third column of Formula 3–1. Under the first constraint, the sum of these matrix elements equals {eta}–1. In this way, we find, for the fraction of molecules cycling, {eta} = 0.371. Finally, using Formula 3 and Ap for the whole spectral range allows us to calculate the spectrum of I2' from (Formula 3–1)3 using Eq. 3. The result is shown in Fig. 2 A (solid squares). The {lambda}max value of the spectrum is at ~350 ± 5 nm.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2  (A) Intermediate spectra I1 ({square}), I2 ({circ}), and I2' ({blacksquare}) calculated from the extrapolated difference spectra of Fig. 1 C. The solid curve represents the spectrum of dark state P for comparison. Vertical dashed lines indicate the wavelengths of the blue (430 nm) and violet (355 nm) excitation flashes used. (B) I2 spectrum for various allowed values of y2 as described in the text. y2 = 0.12 (•), y2 = 0.15 ({blacksquare}), y2 = 0.18 ({blacktriangleup}), y2 = 0.22 ({circ}), y2 = 0.27 ({square}), and y2 = 0.37 ({Delta}). (C) Time courses of the relative concentrations of I1 (solid line), I2 (dashed line), and I2' (dotted line) calculated according to Eq. 1. The time course of the sum of the relative concentrations of I1, I2, and I2' is indicated by dashed-dot-dashed line. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time constants from the global SVD fit of Fig. 1 A.

 
Because only I1 contributes to Formula 31 (see Fig. 1 C), the elements Formula 321 = y1 and Formula 331 = z1 of Formula 3 are given by y1 = z1 = 0. This allows us to calculate the elements of the first column of Formula 3–1. The result is Formula 3. Because the sum of these elements equals 1/{eta} (conservation constraint), we have x1 = {eta} = 0.371. With (Formula 3–1)1 now completely known, we can calculate the spectrum of I1 from (Formula 3–1)1, Formula 3, and Ap using Eq. 3. The result is shown in Fig. 2 A (open squares). This spectrum of I1 is in good agreement with that obtained in previous work (25Go,26Go).

To calculate the spectrum of the third spectral species, I2, we proceeded as follows. From Fig. 1 B, we note that B1 reflects a transition between two intermediates with {lambda}max values of ~460 nm (decay of I1) and 370 nm (rise of I2). Because there is apparently no contribution from the more blue-shifted species I2' ({lambda}max {approx} 350 nm) in B1, which is well known to be formed from I2 in the next transition (12Go), I2' does not contribute to Formula 32 either. Dye-binding experiments also showed that the formation of the signaling state I2' is delayed with respect to the formation of I2 (13Go). Therefore, we conclude that I2' is not involved in the first transition, and thus, z2 = 0. The elements x2, y2, z2 of the second column of Formula 3 can now be expressed in terms of x2, y2, and {eta} with the help of Formula 3Formula 3 = I. Using the conservation constraint, x2 + y2 = {eta}, we finally obtain for the elements of the second column of Formula 3–1, Formula 3. So we have now determined all elements of the second column of Formula 3–1, the only free parameter remaining is y2. Because xi, yi, and zi can assume only positive values and x2 + y2 = {eta}, y2 is restricted to values between 0 and {eta}. The spectrum of I2 can now be calculated from (Formula 3–1)2, Formula 3, and Ap using Eq. 3. The results are shown in Fig. 2 B for six values of y2 from 0.12 to 0.37 (~{eta}). Because the extinction coefficient has to be positive, physically meaningful absorption spectra are obtained only for y2 ≥ 0.22. Of the spectra remaining in Fig. 2 B, we pick the one associated with y2 = 0.22 because it has the smallest spectral bandwidth. For y2 considerably larger than 0.22, the spectral bandwidth becomes much larger than for P and I1, and a secondary absorption maximum develops near 460 nm. This contradicts the original assumption that the UV transitions of I2 and I2' are the longest-wavelength transitions of these intermediates, which precludes transitions at higher wavelengths. The spectrum of I2 for y2 = 0.22 is redrawn in Fig. 2 A (open circles). Its {lambda}max value is at ~370 ± 5 nm. We note that the value of {lambda}max is independent of the choice of y2.

With the spectra of I1, I2, and I2', the time courses of the intermediates were calculated from the experimental {Delta}A({lambda},t) data by matrix inversion of Eq. 1. The time dependence of the relative concentrations of the I1, I2, and I2' intermediates at pH 7 are shown in Fig. 2 C. I1 partially decays to I2 in 270 µs. I1 and I2 then further decay around 2 ms to an I1/I2/I2' equilibrium. This equilibrium finally decays to P in 260 ms. Also shown is the sum of the relative concentrations of these intermediates (dash-dot line). To a good approximation, this sum is constant over the entire time range before the decay to P, validating the data analysis. Its value is very close to {eta} = 0.371, the fraction cycling, showing the internal consistency of the analysis.

pH dependence of photocycle kinetics
To learn more about the nature of the transition between the acid and the neutral pH regimes, the photocycle kinetics were measured at the following 15 pH values: 4.6, 4.8, 5.1, 5.4, 5.7, 6.0, 6.3, 6.6, 6.75, 6.9, 7.35, 7.7, 7.9, 8.1, 8.4. With excitation at 430 nm, time traces were collected at the seven wavelengths 340, 370, 390, 410, 450, 490, and 500 nm over the time range from 50 ns to 50 s. Results for selected wavelengths are shown in Fig. 3. Note that the panels of Fig. 3 have very different vertical scales and correspondingly different signal/noise ratios. The smallest pH-induced absorbance changes are at 500 nm. The initial absorbance change is almost pH independent at every wavelength, suggesting that the amount of I1 formed is independent of pH in this range. At each pH, the absorbance changes at all wavelengths could be fitted simultaneously with a sum of three exponentials. The first time constant was virtually constant in this pH range, varying between 200 and 350 µs. The second time constant varied between 1.3 (pH 8.4) and 10.6 (pH 5.1) ms. As we saw above, the first transition results the decay of I1 to I2, and the second transition is the decay of I1/I2 to the I1/I2/I2' equilibrium. The data of Fig. 3 show that the third time constant, the return of the I1/I2/I2' equilibrium to P, is strongly pH dependent, slowing down with decreasing pH.


Figure 3
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3  pH dependence of the transient absorbance changes after excitation at 430 nm at various wavelengths: (A) 340 nm (characteristic for I2'), (B) 370 nm (characteristic for I2), (C) 390 nm (characteristic for I2), (D) 410 nm (characteristic for I1'), (E) 450 nm (characteristic for P), and (F) 500 nm (characteristic for I1). The color codes for the pH values in each panel are the following: black, pH 8.4; red, pH 6.9; green, pH 6.6; blue, pH 6.0; light blue, pH 5.7; pink, pH 5.4; dark blue, pH 4.8. Conditions: 50 mM MES, 50 mM KCl, 20°C. PYP concentration 53 µM.

 
Some preliminary conclusions on the pH dependence of the I1, I2, I2' intermediate populations may be drawn by inspection of these data. At 340 nm, the extinction coefficient of I2' is larger than that of I2 (Fig. 2 A). Although the sequence of time traces is not entirely regular, the absorbance at 340 nm around 10 ms (Fig. 3 A) seems to increase with pH, suggesting an increase in the relative amount of I2'. At 370 nm, the extinction coefficient of I2 is larger than that of I2' (Fig. 2 A). The decrease in absorbance at 370 nm with pH in the millisecond time range (panel B of Fig. 3) may thus be interpreted as a decrease in the relative amount of I2. At 390 nm, the difference in extinction coefficient between I2 and I2' is even larger. This wavelength is therefore diagnostic for the I2 and I2' transition and for pH effects on this transition. Panel C of Fig. 3 shows the increase in absorbance below 1 ms caused by the I1-to-I2 transition (the extinction coefficient of I2 is larger than that of I1 at this wavelength, see Fig. 2 A). The amount of I2 formed apparently decreases with increasing pH, judging from the amplitude of the absorption change below 1 ms in Fig. 3 C. Around 2–3 ms, there is a large decrease in absorbance caused by the I2-to-I2' transition. The amplitude of this transition increases with pH, suggesting that more I2' is formed at alkaline pH. Panel D shows time traces at 410 nm. This wavelength is appropriate for monitoring the I1' intermediate, which occurs at alkaline pH (25Go). These traces indicate that this intermediate is absent in this pH range. The traces at 500 nm (panel F) are characteristic of I1. They suggest that, with increasing pH, the I1-to-I2 transition slows down somewhat and that more I1 remains after the I1/I2-to-I2' transition. This is also supported by the traces at 450 nm (panel E) indicating that the ground state depletion decreases with pH. In the next section these qualitative conclusions about the pH dependence of the intermediate populations, which were drawn from the data themselves in a model-independent way without any assumptions, are confirmed by a quantitative analysis.

To obtain the time courses of the intermediate populations, it was assumed that the spectra of I1, I2, and I2' of Fig. 2 A are pH independent and that no other intermediates contribute in the pH range from 4.6 to 8.4. Equation 1 was then used to calculate the time traces ni(t) for each intermediate at each pH value from the absorbance changes {Delta}A({lambda}, t) and the spectra Ai({lambda}) by matrix inversion. The time dependencies of the populations of I1, I2, and I2' at 7 of the 15 pH values are shown in panels A, B, and C of Fig. 4. They confirm what was suggested by the data of Fig. 3: I1 decays partially to I2; I2 then partially decays to I2'; beyond 10 ms I1, I2, and I2' are in equilibrium and return together to P. Fig. 4 D shows that the sum of the populations is approximately constant in time and equal to the fraction cycling. Whereas the population of I1 in equilibrium with I2 and I2' is only slightly pH dependent (see traces in Fig. 4 A around 10 ms), the concentrations of I2 and I2' show a strong and opposite pH dependence. With increasing pH, the amount of I2' increases at the expense of a corresponding decrease in the I2 population. To quantify this pH dependence of the equilibrium populations, their concentrations at 10 ms were taken from Fig. 4, B and C (vertical dashed lines). The corresponding concentrations of I2 and I2' are plotted in Fig. 5 A as a function of pH. The solid curves are the results of a simultaneous fit with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. The fit parameters were pKa {approx} 6.4 and n {approx} 0.98. I2 and I2' are thus in a pH-dependent equilibrium.


Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4  Time courses of the relative concentrations of the I1 (A), I2 (B), and I2' (C) intermediates at various pH values calculated using Eq. 1 as explained in the text. (D) Time course of the sum of the populations of I1, I2, and I2'. Color code as in Fig. 3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5  (A) pH dependence of the equilibrium concentrations of the I2 ({circ}) and I2' (•) intermediates at 10 ms derived from Fig. 4, B and C, respectively. The solid curves are simultaneous fits of these titration curves with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation with pKa = 6.4 and n {approx} 0.98. (B) pH dependence of the decay rate k3 of the ground-state recovery. For every pH, the decay rate k3 was derived from the simultaneous fit of the measured transient absorbance changes at 340 nm, 370 nm, 390 nm, 410 nm, 450 nm, 490 nm, and 500 nm with a sum of three exponentials. The solid curve in B is the fit of the decay rate k3 with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation with pKa = 6.3, n {approx} 0.84.

 
The ground state recovery slows down at acid pH. The rate constant k3 for this recovery was determined from a global fit of the data of Fig. 3 at all seven wavelengths. Its pH dependence is plotted in Fig. 5 B. A fit with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation results in a pKa of ~6.3 and n of ~0.8 . The apparent decay rate for the dark-state recovery thus seems to be proportional to the I2' population in the I1/I2 /I2' equilibrium. This relationship is expected in the framework of a simple model presented in the discussion.

pH dependence of photoreversal kinetics
Recently, we measured and analyzed the kinetics of photoreversal from I2, I2', and I1 at pH 6 in detail (33Go). The time delay between the two flashes was varied from 1 µs to 3 s, and the photoreversal kinetics were measured at 26 wavelengths from 330 to 510 nm (33Go). The photoreversal time traces at pH 6 required two exponentials for an adequate fit with well-separated time constants of {tau}1 = 60 and {tau}2 = 400 µs. These time constants were assigned to photoreversal from I2 (60 µs) and I2' (400 µs), respectively, on the basis of the delay dependence of the amplitudes (33Go). Moreover, we found that I2 and I2' are in equilibrium (33Go). Here, our focus is on the pH dependence. The photoreversal kinetics were therefore measured at only two wavelengths (340 and 450 nm) and at the fixed delay of 20 ms. At this time delay all three intermediates I2, I2', and I1 are present and in equilibrium (Figs. 2 C and 4).

The photoreversal signals at pH 5.1 and 8.1 are shown in Fig. 6 A. For clarity, only the traces at 2 of the 15 pH values are shown together with their simultaneous fits (solid lines). As at pH 6 (33Go), the kinetics required two exponentials over the pH range from 4.6 to 6.9. These two phases can be clearly discerned in the data at pH 5.1. From pH 7.3 on, only the slow component was required. The fast time constant was virtually pH independent, varying between 48 and 63 µs. The second time constant varied between 330 and 770 µs in the pH range investigated. Comparison of the time traces in Fig. 6 A makes it clear that there are significant differences between pH 5.1 and 8.1. The total initial photoreversal signal is somewhat larger at pH 5.1 than at 8.1, suggesting that more I2/I2' can be photoreversed. The amplitude data provide further insight. The pH dependence of the amplitudes A1 and A2 (for the corresponding time constants {tau}1 and {tau}2) are plotted in Fig. 6, B (340 nm) and C (450 nm). These figures confirm that, with increasing pH, A1 becomes smaller, approaching zero around pH 7 at both wavelengths, whereas A2 shows a corresponding increase. The solid curves are simultaneous fits of the amplitudes at 340 and 450 nm with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, with pKa = 6.1 and n = 1.9. We assigned A1 and A2 to photoreversal from I2 and I2', respectively (33Go). The results of Fig. 6, B and C thus suggest that, with increasing pH, the I2/I2' equilibrium shifts from I2 at pH 4.6 to I2' at pH 8.4. These results, from the pH dependence of the photoreversal amplitudes, thus support our observations from the photocycle, where a pKa of 6.4 was obtained. We note that in the photocycle experiments, n = 0.98 (I2/I2' equilibrium) or 0.8 (recovery rate), whereas we obtained n = 1.9 from the photoreversal kinetics. The photoreversal absorbance changes required various corrections and are, moreover, quite small. The errors are correspondingly large. The photocycle data points, on the other hand, display much less scattering, in particular for k3, and did not require complex corrections. We believe, therefore, that the number of protons involved is one in both experiments.


Figure 6
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6  (A) Photoreversal signals, at 340 nm (positive) and 450 nm (negative) at pH 5.1 (black) and 8.1 (red), calculated as described in the text. For clarity, the data obtained at 13 other pH values ranging from 4.6 to 8.4 are not shown. The solid curves represent a simultaneous exponential fit to the 340-nm and 450-nm traces. Conditions: 20°C, 50 mM KCl and 50 mM MES, PYP concentration 53 µM. The delay between first (blue, 430 nm) and second (violet, 355 nm) flashes is 20 ms. (B and C) pH dependence of the photoreversal amplitudes A1 and A2 at 340 nm (B) and 450 nm (C). A1 (•) and A2 ({circ}) are the amplitudes of the fast (48–60 µs) and slow (300–770 µs) components, respectively, obtained from the simultaneous fit of the 340-nm and 450-nm traces of panel A. The solid curves of panels B and C represent a common fit to the pH dependence of all four amplitudes with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, with a pKa of 6.1 (dashed vertical lines) and a Hill coefficient of 1.9.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
From measurements of the pH dependence of the photocycle and photoreversal kinetics of PYP between 4.6 and 8.4, we obtained the following results: 1) the spectra of the signaling state I2' (350 nm) and its precursor I2 (370 nm) differ by ~20 nm; 2) from several milliseconds (formation of I2') to the end of the cycle, the three intermediates I1, I2, and I2' are in equilibrium; and 3) the pKa of the pH-dependent equilibrium between I2' and its precursor I2 is ~6.4 from photocycle kinetics and ~6.1 from photoreversal kinetics. The pH is thus an important parameter that controls the amount of receptor in the active state. This is analogous to the case of the photoreceptor rhodopsin, where the equilibrium between the signaling state MII and its precursor MI is also strongly pH dependent (e.g., (43Go)). We recently showed (26Go) that the I2/I2' equilibrium, like the MI/MII equilibrium (44Go), also depends on the salt concentration. In both photoreceptors, high salt favors the signaling state. The proposed reaction scheme for the kinetics and equilibria of the photocycle in this pH range is presented in Fig. 7.


Figure 7
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7  Proposed model for the kinetics of the photocycle and photoreversal of PYP in the pH range from 4 to 8. The Formula 3 and I2'cis intermediates are in a pH-dependent equilibrium and photoreverse to Ptrans with exponential time constants of 57 and 380 µs. The pKa of the Formula 3 equilibrium is 6.4. Note the equilibria among I1, I2, and I2'. These three intermediates decay together to P. For clarity the short-lived intermediates I0 and Formula 3 between P* and I1 are not shown. The proton arrows indicate the transient uptake and release of protons as detected by a pH-sensitive dye in solution (13Go).

 
The existence of two distinguishable I2 intermediates with protonated chromophores was first demonstrated by time-resolved FTIR (12Go,18Go). I2 decays to I2' in ~2–3 ms (12Go,18Go). This transition to the signaling state I2' is characterized by a global conformational change (12Go,18Go). Here, we showed that this transition may also be monitored by transient electronic absorption spectroscopy and determined the absorption spectra of I2 and I2' by the extrapolated difference method (25Go,37Go). The {lambda}max values of I2 and I2' are 370 ± 5 and 350 ± 5 nm, respectively. Absorption spectra for I2 and I2' at pH 8.1 were presented by Hendriks et al. (11Go). No {lambda}max values were provided, but the spectrum of I2 was said to be "slightly red-shifted" with respect to I2' in agreement with our results. The spectrum of I2 presented by Hendriks et al. (11Go) is so noisy that it is difficult to estimate {lambda}max. The poor quality of this spectrum is probably caused by the fact that at pH 8.1 the contribution of I2 in the equilibrium is very low, as we showed here (Fig. 5 A).

Using the spectra of I2 and I2' from Fig. 2 A and assuming that they are pH independent in the pH range from 4.6 to 8.4, we obtained the time dependence of the concentrations of I1, I2, and I2' (Fig. 4). From ~5 ms onward, I1, I2, and I2' are in equilibrium and decay together to the initial dark state P. The equilibrium intermediate populations of I2 and I2' are pH dependent with a pKa of ~6.4. Below the pKa, I2 is the major species; above the pKa the opposite holds. We note that these transitions are not complete (Fig. 5 A).

The sum of the populations of the I1, I2, and I2' intermediates in Fig. 4 D is not as constant in time for every pH as it should be and as it is at pH 7 (Fig. 2 C). One cause could be that the intermediate spectra are not exactly pH independent over the whole pH range, so that the spectra derived at pH 7 are not quite correct for every pH. So we derived a second set of intermediate spectra from a joint SVD analysis over the whole pH range as in Joshi et al. (25Go). These are the best pH-averaged intermediate spectra. The differences with the set at pH 7 (Fig. 2 A) are small. A third set was obtained from the scaled subtraction method (25Go). All three sets of intermediate spectra lead to the same pKa value. The results differed only somewhat in terms of the end values of the titrations at high pH. The sum of the populations remained slightly time-dependent, however, and other inadequacies developed, such as slightly negative populations. Because the spectra of I2 and I2' are quite similar, the analysis is sensitive to the small differences between them. We believe this is the likely source of the error in Fig. 4 D.

Measurements of the pH dependence of the photoreversal kinetics of I2 and I2' at a delay of 20 ms (Fig. 6) provide further support for this pKa. The kinetics are characterized by a fast (50–60 µs) and a slow (300–800 µs) component, which result from photoreversal from I2 and I2', respectively (33Go). The corresponding amplitudes are pH dependent (Fig. 6, B and C) with a pKa of 6.1, in good agreement with the value of 6.4 obtained from the photocycle kinetics. The amplitude for I2 goes to zero beyond pH 7.3. The photoreversal data thus suggest that no I2 remains at alkaline pH, whereas the photocycle data indicate that some I2 remains because [I2]/([I2] + [I2']) is ~0.25 at pH 8.6 (Fig. 5 A). We note that the end value of the I2 population at high pH in Fig. 5 A is quite sensitive to the exact choice of the I1 spectrum. In a recent investigation on the intermediates and spectra at alkaline pH (25Go), we found that only three intermediates, I1, I1', and I2', are present above pH 8, i.e., no I2.

The pH dependence of the absorption spectrum of a photostationary mixture of P, I2, and I2' produced by background illumination was recently analyzed by SVD (34Go). It was shown that I2 and I2' are in a pH-dependent equilibrium with a pKa of 6.3 and that the spectrum of the high-pH species I2' is blue-shifted with respect to that of the low-pH species I2 (34Go). The I2 and I2' intermediates also differ with regard to the fluorescence lifetime of the single tryptophan of PYP, W-119 (34Go). In I2, the lifetime is long (0.82 ns). In I2', the lifetime is much shorter (0.04 ns). Using background illumination, these authors showed that the fluorescence decay in the photostationary state is pH dependent with I2 dominating at low pH and I2' at high pH (34Go). The pKa was ~6.3. Combining the pH dependence of the fluorescence amplitudes with that of the photostationary absorption, absorption spectra were calculated for the I2 and I2' species. These had {lambda}max values of 372 and 352 nm for I2 and I2', respectively (34Go), in good agreement with the results reported in this work.

The results on the pH dependence of the I2/I2' equilibrium (34Go) were recently confirmed (29Go). Analysis of the photostationary absorption spectra by a scaled subtraction procedure yielded a pKa of 6.4 and {lambda}max values of 367 and 356 nm for I2 and I2', respectively (29Go). These authors showed, moreover, from CD and small-angle x-ray scattering experiments that the global structural transition occurs between these two intermediates with a pKa of 6.4. Together with the kinetics results from time-resolved absorption spectroscopy presented here, these complementary methods lead to a comprehensive picture of the I2-to-I2' equilibrium.

As is well known (23Go) and confirmed here (Fig. 5 C), the rate k3, for the ground state recovery, is also pH dependent with a pKa of 6.3, i.e., within experimental error equal to that for the I2/I2' equilibrium (6.4 and 6.1, from single flash photolysis and photoreversal measurements, respectively). Thus, k3 seems to be proportional to the I2' population (compare Fig. 5, A and B). Such a proportionality is expected under the following conditions: 1) the equilibration rates among I1, I2, and I2' are rapid compared to the microscopic rates of return from each intermediate to the ground state; 2) the latter are pH independent; and 3) the rate from I2' to P is much larger than from the other intermediates. A similar model was recently proposed to explain the pH dependence of the rate of ground state recovery at alkaline pH (25Go). At alkaline pH, the I1, I1', and I2' intermediates are in equilibrium. The pKa of the I1'-to-I2' equilibrium is ~9.9, and the ground state recovery rate constant k3 has a pKa of 9.7 and is proportional to the I2' population. There is thus a striking similarity between the behavior at high and low pH. For both branches of the bell-shaped pH dependence of k3, it seems that k3 is proportional to [I2']. This proportionality is not exact however, because k3 approaches zero at low pH, whereas [I2'] approaches a constant value unequal to zero. A more detailed model thus seems to be required. Nevertheless, this symmetry between low and high pH behavior is worth pointing out, and the underlying model provides a lowest-order explanation.

An important question concerns the group responsible for the pKa of ~6.4. The similar pKa for the recovery rate k3 is commonly attributed to the carboxyl group of E-46 (35Go,36Go). We now need to discuss this pKa in the context of the underlying I2/I2' equilibrium. What is the mechanism whereby a change in protonation of E-46 shifts the equilibrium from I2 to I2'. In I2 the chromophore is already protonated and has moved away from E-46 toward the surface (6Go). If E-46 is the internal proton donor for the chromophore, its carboxyl group is presumably already deprotonated in I2, in accordance with some observations from time-resolved FTIR (12Go). In I2' the chromophore remains protonated, but the protein structure is changed in a major way. It is unclear how the deprotonated E-46 could affect the I2/I2' conformational equilibrium. If, however, E-46 is not the internal proton donor, and the chromophore is protonated from the external medium, as suggested (13Go), E-46 could remain protonated in I2 and be deprotonated in I2'. In other time-resolved FTIR measurements (18Go), a positive band was observed at 1759 cm–1 with a risetime of 113 µs (formation of I2) and assigned to an environmental shift of the protonated E-46. Brudler et al. (18Go) were not aware of the I2/I2' equilibrium and concluded from the fact that the amplitude of the positive band was significantly smaller than that of the negative band due to the initial dark state, that only a fraction of the molecules cycling had a protonated E-46 in I2. Their experiments were, however, performed in buffer at pH 7. At this pH, the I2/I2' equilibrium is far on the side of I2' (see Fig. 5 A), so that only a minority of molecules would have been in the I2 state. It is thus consistent with the time-resolved data of (18Go) to conclude that in I2 the carboxyl group of E-46 is protonated. Recent photostationary FTIR measurements also indicate that E-46 is at least partially protonated in I2 (29Go). A role of E-46 in controlling the I2/I2' equilibrium is thus plausible. In the absence of the carboxyl group, in the mutant E46Q, the conformational change in I2' is much smaller or absent (12Go), and the absorption maximum at pH 7 is at 368 nm (45Go), i.e., I2-like. These results suggest that in the absence of E-46 the I2/I2' equilibrium is predominantly or entirely on the side of I2 and further support the idea that E-46 is responsible for the wild-type pKa of 6.4. We note that this reinterpretation of the FTIR results is consistent with a mechanism of chromophore protonation from the external medium (13Go).

Another residue that might be involved is H-108. The pH dependence of the steady-state proton uptake was investigated (46Go), and from the observed pH dependence, a pKa of 6.6 was obtained, which was attributed to histidine-108. This residue is located on the central ß-scaffold and may be involved in the interaction between the ß-scaffold and the N-terminal domain. It was recently postulated, on the basis of the observation that the I2-to-I2' transition is blocked at low salt concentrations, that the loss of this interaction is a prerequisite for the formation of I2' (26Go).

Recently two forms of I1 could be distinguished on the basis of their resonance Raman spectra, which are in a pH-dependent equilibrium with a pKa of ~6.2 (30Go). The low-pH form Formula 3 lacks the hydrogen bond with E-46, whereas the high-pH form (Formula 3) has both hydrogen bonds. It is possible that the pH dependence observed here for the I2/I2' equilibrium results from the pH dependence of the preceding Formula 3 equilibrium.

In conclusion, we have shown from measurements of the time-dependent intermediate populations that the equilibrium between I2 and I2' and the formation of the signaling state I2' are pH dependent with a pKa of ~6.4. The intracellular pH may thus regulate the amount of active receptor. The value of this pKa provides an explanation for the similar well-known pKa of the rate constant for the ground-state recovery. We find, moreover, that I2' is blue-shifted with respect to I2 by ~20 nm, suggesting a different chromophore environment for the exposed chromophore in the signaling state.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant GM 66146 to M.A.C.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant GK 788 TP A9 to M.P.H.).

Submitted on April 10, 2006; accepted for publication June 15, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
1. Cusanovich, M. A., and T. E. Meyer. 2003. Photoactive yellow protein: a prototypic PAS domain sensory protein and development of a common signaling mechanism. Biochemistry. 42:4759–4770.[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Taylor, B. L., and I. B. Zhulin. 1999. PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:479–506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Borgstahl, G. E. O., D. R. Williams, and E. D. Getzoff. 1995. 1.4 Å structure of photoactive yellow protein, a cytosolic photoreceptor: unusual fold, active site and chromophore. Biochemistry. 34:6278–6287.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Rajagopal, S., S. Anderson, V. Srajer, M. Schmidt, R. Pahl, and K. Moffat. 2005. A structural pathway for signalling in the E46Q mutant of photoactive yellow protein. Structure. 13:55–63.[Medline]

5. Ihee, H., S. Rajagopal, V. Srajer, R. Pahl, S. Anderson, M. Schmidt, F. Schotte, P. A. Anfinrud, M. Wulff, and K. Moffat. 2005. Visualizing reaction pathways in photoactive yellow protein from nanoseconds to seconds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:7145–7150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Genick, U. K., G. E. Borgstahl, K. Ng, Z. Ren, C. Pradervand, P. M. Burke, V. Srajer, T. Y. Teng, W. Schildkamp, D. E. McRee, K. Moffat, and E. D. Getzoff. 1997. Structure of a protein photocycle intermediate by millisecond time-resolved crystallography. Science. 275:1471–1475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Dux, P., G. Rubinstenn, G. W. Vuister, R. Boelens, F. A. A. Mulder, K. Hard, W. D. Hoff, A. R. Kroon, W. Crielaard, K. J. Hellingwerf, and R. Kaptein. 1998. Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the photoactive yellow protein. Biochemistry. 37:12689–12699.[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Sprenger, W. W., W. D. Hoff, J. P. Armitage, and K. J. Hellingwerf. 1993. The eubacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is negatively phototactic, with a wavelength dependence that fits the absorption spectrum of photoactive yellow protein. J. Bacteriol. 175:3096–3104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hoff, W. D., I. H. M. van Stokkum, H.-J. van Ramesdonk, M. E. van Brederode, A. M. Brouwer, J. C. Fitch, T. E. Meyer, R. van Grondelle, and K. J. Hellingwerf. 1994. Measurement and global analysis of the absorbance changes in the photocycle of the photoactive yellow protein from Ectothiorhodospira halophila. Biophys. J. 67:1691–1705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ujj, L., S. Devanathan, T. E. Meyer, M. A. Cusanovich, G. Tollin, and G. H. Atkinson. 1998. New photocycle intermediate in the photoactive yellow protein from Ectorhodospira halophila: picosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 75:406–412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Hendriks, J., I. H. M. van Stokkum, and K. J. Hellingwerf. 2003. Deuterium isotope effects in the photocycle transitions of the photoactive yellow protein. Biophys. J. 84:1180–1191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Xie, A., L. Kelemen, J. Hendriks, B. J. White, K. J. Hellingwerf, and W. D. Hoff. 2001. Formation of a new buried charge drives a large-amplitude protein quake in photoreceptor activation. Biochemistry. 40:1510–1517.[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Borucki, B., S. Devanathan, H. Otto, M. A. Cusanovich, G. Tollin, and M. P. Heyn. 2002. Kinetics of proton uptake and dye binding by photoactive yellow protein in wildtype and in the E46Q and E46A mutants. Biochemistry. 41:10026–10037.[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Rubinstenn, G., G. W. Vuister, F. A. A. Mulder, P. E. Dux, R. Boelens, K. J. Hellingwerf, and R. Kaptein. 1998. Structural and dynamic changes of photoactive yellow protein during its photocycle in solution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:568–570.[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Bernhard, C., K. Houben, N. M. Derix, D. Marks, M. A. van der Horst, K. J. Hellingwerf, R. Boelens, R. Kaptein, and N. A. J. van Nuland. 2005. The solution structure of a transient photoreceptor intermediate: {Delta}25 photoactive yellow protein. Structure. 13:953–962.[Medline]

16. Lee, B.-C., P. A. Croonquist, T. R. Sosnick, and W. D. Hoff. 2001. PAS domain receptor photoactive yellow protein is converted to a molten globule state upon activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:20821–20823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Imamoto, Y., H. Kamikubo, M. Harigai, N. Shimizu, and M. Kataoka. 2002. Light-induced global conformational change of photoactive yellow protein in solution. Biochemistry. 41:13595–13601.[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Brudler, R., R. Rammelsberg, T. T. Woo, E. D. Getzoff, and K. Gerwert. 2001. Structure of the I1 early intermediate of photoactive yellow protein by FTIR spectroscopy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:265–270.[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Meyer, T. E., G. Tollin, J. H. Hazzard, and M. A. Cusanovich. 1989. Photoactive yellow protein from the purple phototropic bacterium, Ectothiorhodospira halophila: quantum yield of photobleaching and effects of temperature, alcohols, glycerol, and sucrose on kinetics of photobleaching and recovery. Biophys. J. 56:559–564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Meyer, T. E., E. Yakali, M. A. Cusanovich, and G. Tollin. 1987. Properties of a water-soluble, yellow protein isolated from a halophilic phototrophic bacterium that has photochemical activity analogous to sensory rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 26:418–423.[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Unno, M., M. Kumauchi, J. Sasaki, F. Tokunaga, and S. Yamauchi. 2000. Evidence for a protonated and cis configuration chromophore in the photobleached intermediate of photoactive yellow protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122:4233–4234.[CrossRef]

22. Pan, D., A. Philip, W. D. Hoff, and R. A. Mathies. 2004. Time-resolved resonance Raman structural studies of the pB' intermediate in the photocycle of photoactive yellow protein. Biophys. J. 86:2374–2382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Genick, U. K., S. Devanathan, T. E. Meyer, I. L. Canestrelli, E. Williams, M. A. Cusanovich, G. Tollin, and E. D. Getzoff. 1997. Active site mutants implicate key residues for control of color and light cycle kinetics of photoactive yellow protein. Biochemistry. 36:8–14.[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Borucki, B., H. Otto, C. P. Joshi, C. Gasperi, M. A. Cusanovich, S. Devanathan, G. Tollin, and M. P. Heyn. 2003. pH dependence of the photocycle kinetics of the E46Q mutant of photoactive yellow protein: protonation equilibrium between the I1 and I2 intermediates, chromophore deprotonation by hydroxyl uptake, and protonation relaxation in the dark state. Biochemistry. 42:8780–8790.[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Joshi, C. P., B. Borucki, H. Otto, T. E. Meyer, M. A. Cusanovich, and M. P. Heyn. 2006. Photocycle and photoreversal of photoactive yellow protein at alkaline pH: kinetics, intermediates and equilibria. Biochemistry. 45:7057–7068.[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Borucki, B., J. A. Kyndt, C. P. Joshi, H. Otto, T. E. Meyer, M. A. Cusanovich, and M. P. Heyn. 2005. Effect of salt and pH on the activation of photoactive yellow protein and gateway mutants Y98Q and Y98F. Biochemistry. 44:13650–13663.[CrossRef]