| Protein in Sugar Films and in Glycerol/Water as Examined by Infrared Spectroscopy and by the Fluorescence and Phosphorescence of Tryptophan Biophysical Journal, Volume 85, Issue 3, 1 September 2003, Pages 1980-1995 Wayne W. Wright, Gregory T. Guffanti and Jane M. Vanderkooi Abstract Sugars are known to stabilize proteins. This study addresses questions of the nature of sugar and proteins incorporated in solid sugar films. Infrared (IR) and Raman spectroscopy was used to examine trehalose and sucrose films and glycerol/water solvent. Proteins and indole-containing compounds that are imbedded in the sugar films were studied by IR and optical (absorption, fluorescence, and phosphorescence) spectroscopy. Water is able to move in the sugar films in the temperature range of 20–300K as suggested by IR absorption bands of HOH bending and OH stretching modes that shift continuously with temperature. In glycerol/water these bands reflect the glass transition at ∼160K. The fluorescence of N-acetyl-L-tryptophanamide and tryptophan of melittin, Ca-free parvalbumin, and staphylococcal nuclease in dry trehalose/sucrose films remains broad and red-shifted over a temperature excursion of 20–300K. In contrast, the fluorescence of these compounds in glycerol/water solvent shift to the blue as temperature decreases. The fluorescence of the buried tryptophan in Ca-bound parvalbumin in either sugar film or glycerol/water remains blue-shifted and has vibronic resolution over the entire temperature range. The red shift for fluorescence of indole groups exposed to solvent in the sugars is consistent with the motion of water molecules around the excited-state molecule that occurs even at low temperature, although the possibility of static complex formation between the excited-state molecule and water or other factors is discussed. The phosphorescence yield for protein and model indole compounds is sensitive to the matrix glass transition. Phosphorescence emission spectra are resolved and shift little in different solvents or temperature, as predicted by the small dipole moment of the excited triplet state molecule. The conclusion is that the sugar film maintains the environment present at the glass formation temperature for surface Trp and amide groups over a wide temperature excursion. In glycerol/water these groups reflect local changes in the environment as temperature changes. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (374 kb) |
| Primary structure of peptides and ion channels. Role of amino acid side chains in voltage gating of melittin channels Biophysical Journal, Volume 58, Issue 6, 1 December 1990, Pages 1367-1375 M.T. Tosteson, O. Alvarez, W. Hubbell, R.M. Bieganski, C. Attenbach, L.H. Caporales, J.J. Levy, R.F. Nutt, M. Rosenblatt and D.C. Tosteson Abstract Melittin produces a voltage-dependent increase in the conductance of planar lipid bilayers. The conductance increases when the side of the membrane to which melittin has been added (cis-side) is made positive. This paper reports observations on the effect of modifying two positively charged amino acid residues within the NH2-terminal region of the molecule: lysine at position 7 (K7), and the NH2-terminal glycine (G1). We have synthesized melittin analogues in which K7 is replaced by asparagine (K7-N), G1 is blocked by a formyl group (G1-f), and in which both modifications of the parent compound were introduced (G1-f, K7-N). The time required to reach peak conductance during a constant voltage pulse was shorter in membranes exposed to the analogues than in membranes modified by melittin. The apparent number of monomers producing a conducting unit for [K7-N]-melittin and [G1-f]-melittin, eight, was found to be greater than the one for [G1-f], K7-N]-melittin and for melittin itself, four. The apparent gating charge per monomer was less for the analogues, 0.5–0.3 than for melittin, one. Essentially similar results were obtained with melittin analogues in which the charge on K7 or G1 or both was blocked by an uncharged N-linked spin label. These results show that the positive charges in the NH2-terminal region of melittin play a major but not exclusive role in the voltage gating of melittin channels in bilayers. Abstract | PDF (717 kb) |
| Enhanced resolution of fluorescence anisotropy decays by simultaneous analysis of progressively quenched samples. Applications to anisotropic rotations and to protein dynamics Biophysical Journal, Volume 51, Issue 5, 1 May 1987, Pages 755-768 J.R. Lakowicz, H. Cherek, I. Gryczynski, N. Joshi and M.L. Johnson Abstract Enhanced resolution of rapid and complex anisotropy decays was obtained by measurement and analysis of data from progressively quenched samples. Collisional quenching by acrylamide was used to vary the mean decay time of indole or of the tryptophan fluorescence from melittin. Anisotropy decays were obtained from the frequency-response of the polarized emission at frequencies from 4 to 2,000 MHz. Quenching increases the fraction of the total emission, which occurs on the subnanosecond timescale, and thereby provides increased information on picosecond rotational motions or local motions in proteins. For monoexponential subnanosecond anisotropy decays, enhanced resolution is obtained by measurement of the most highly quenched samples. For complex anisotropy decays, such as those due to both local motions and overall protein rotational diffusion, superior resolution is obtained by simultaneous analysis of data from quenched and unquenched samples. We demonstrate that measurement of quenched samples greatly reduces the uncertainty of the 50-ps correlation time of indole in water at 20 degrees C, and allows resolution of the anisotropic rotation of indole with correlation times of 140 and 720 ps. The method was applied to melittin in the monomeric and tetrameric forms. With increased quenching, the anisotropy data showed decreasing contributions from overall protein rotation and increased contribution from picosecond tryptophan motions. The tryptophan residues in both the monomeric and the tetrameric forms of melittin displayed substantial local motions with correlation times near 0.16 and 0.06 ns, respectively. The amplitude of the local motion is twofold less in the tetramer. These highly resolved anisotropy decays should be valuable for comparison with molecular dynamics simulations of melittin. Abstract | PDF (3118 kb) |
Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.
Biophysical Journal, Volume 93, Issue 1, L04-L06, 1 July 2007
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.108290
Biophysical Letters
Philip E. Mason*, John W. Brady*,
, George W. Neilson† and Christopher E. Dempsey‡,
, 
* Department of Food Sciences, Stocking Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
† H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
‡ Department of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Address reprint requests and inquiries to Chris Dempsey, Tel.: 44-117-928-7427, or John Brady, Tel.: 607-255-2897.Protein denaturants such as urea and guanidinium (Gdm+) chloride preferentially accumulate at the surface of folded proteins, and the extent of this accumulation is related to their denaturant activities 1. Thus Gdm+ has a partition coefficient, Knat, for accumulation at the surface of bovine serum albumin, of ∼1.6 relative to the bulk solution concentration, whereas Knat for urea is ∼1.1 2. These observations reflect a general phenomenon, since protein-stabilizing solutes (osmolytes such as trimethylammonium oxide or strongly hydrated ions like sulfate) are excluded from the protein surface 2,3. Although the polypeptide backbone makes a strong contribution to solute effects on protein stability 3, preferential partitioning of solutes, including denaturants, can be measured with folded proteins. The nature of the solute-protein interactions that underlie this observation is not known at the molecular level.
Previous molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins in urea identified hydrogen bonding with exposed polar groups as a mechanism for surface accumulation of urea 4,5,6. Recent studies from our groups indicate that the hydration properties of Gdm+ might support alternative binding modes relevant to its surface accumulation and denaturant activity 7,8,9. Neutron diffraction with isotopic substitution demonstrates that Gdm+ forms hydrogen bonds with water in the molecular plane, but is weakly hydrated above and below the molecular plane 7. The hydrophobic nature of the face of the Gdm+ cation results in homo-ion pairing (i.e., stacking) in MD simulations of strongly denaturing salts [Gdm+Cl−; Gdm+SCN−] 8,9. This behavior indicates that Gdm+ ions might stack against hydrophobic side chains, reducing the entropic cost of hydrophobic hydration by displacing waters 10,11, while also hydrogen-bonding to the backbone in unfolded proteins. Homo-ion stacking suggests that Gdm+ should interact with the planar guanidine moiety of Arg, and possibly with aromatic side chains and planar side-chain amide groups. Such behavior might explain the enhanced preferential partitioning and denaturant activity of Gdm+ over urea that is not fully represented in the relative activities of these denaturants to attenuate structure stabilized by hydrogen bonds 12.
To examine the interactions of the Gdm+ ion with the surface of a folded polypeptide, we have run MD simulations of a helical peptide, melittin, in a solution of GdmCl. Melittin, the membrane-active toxin from bee venom 13, is a 26-amino-acid peptide with the sequence GIGAVLKVLTTGLPALISWIKRKRQQ-NH2. It is soluble in both the tetrameric α-helical form and the monomeric random coil 14. The melittin monomer does not normally exist as an α-helix, and the peptide only assumes this form in water as the structured tetramer. However, our goal was to use melittin as a model peptide with a representative mix of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups exposed to water. For example, one face of the melittin helix has a hydrophobic surface made up largely of aliphatic side chains that are normally buried in the helical tetramer. Simulation of the monomer allows us to assess the interactions of Gdm+ with hydrophobic regions not normally accessible in a folded polypeptide or proteins.
Simulation details are available in the Supplementary Material . An 8ns NVE-ensemble simulation (the first 0.5ns used as equilibration) was calculated using CHARMM 15. The system consisted of a 44.7Å cube containing 125 GdmCl units, one melittin, six Cl− counterions, and 2319 TIP3P waters 16. Density maps were calculated for Gdm+ nitrogen atoms relative to melittin, as has previously been done for water around small rigid solutes 17,18. The size and flexibility of the melittin helix make it more difficult to analyze Gdm+ density around the peptide than in previous applications 19, and only local densities could be compared due to motional smearing on a larger scale.
Apart from some fraying at the N- and C-termini, and bending near Pro14, the helix remains largely intact throughout the simulation. The ion densities are statistically converged and temporally stable on this timescale; the average densities for the two halves of the simulation are statistically equivalent. As predicted, the Gdm+ ions were found to bind weakly to melittin by stacking against the hydrophobic groups of the peptide. In addition, Gdm+ ions also complex with the like-charged guanidine groups of Arg22 and Arg24 in a stacked manner (Fig. 1) similar to that found for Gdm+ ions in GdmCl and GdmSCN solutions 8,9. Preferential partitioning of Gdm+ by weak stacking interactions was also observed for the indole group of Trp19 (Fig. 1) and the planar side-chain amides of the Gln25/26 residues (see Supplementary Material ).
Interaction of Gdm+ with melittin side chains results in displacement of waters from the hydration surface. This is illustrated by the hydration of the indole group of Trp19. At least one Gdm+ ion occupies a position within the hydration sphere (Gdm+ carbon atoms within 4.5Å of an indole atom) of the Trp indole group for virtually the entire simulation (Fig. 2), although not all of these interactions involve stacking modes. For short periods of the trajectory with no indole-Gdm+ interactions, the indole group has 13–16 waters in its hydration volume (within 4.5Å). The average number of waters hydrating the Trp indole in the full simulation is 10.9, indicating a significant displacement of hydrating waters by Gdm+-indole interactions.
Water displacement from weakly hydrated surfaces of other side chains occurs in a similar manner. Fig. 3 illustrates that the guanidine group of Arg interacts with hydrating waters via in-plane hydrogen bonding and with Gdm+ by a stacking interactions (Fig. 1). The latter interaction results in the displacement of waters from the surface above the plane of the guanidine group. Gdm+ aligns adjacent to the nonpolar surface composed of aliphatic amino-acid side chains, although the atom density for the denaturant is diffusely distributed compared to that for the interaction with the planar π-systems of Arg, Trp, and Gln (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Material ).
The residence times for Gdm+ ions around both the Trp19 and Arg22 side chains were ∼30ps, which was almost the same as the lifetime for Gdm+-Gdm+ interactions. The residence times for Gdm+ ions adjacent to neutral hydrophilic residues (Ser, Gln, Thr) were also similar to those adjacent to the hydrophobic residues (Ala, Val, Ile), which is somewhat different from previous findings with urea 4,5,6. Averaged over the simulation, ∼7.6 Gdm+ ions bound to the peptide. This coordination number does not equate to an accumulation relative to the bulk Gdm+ concentration, a consequence of the very high positive charge (+6) of the peptide. We ran two further 4-ns simulations in which the net positive charge of the peptide was reduced to +2 and +1, respectively, first by deprotonating the amino groups of the N-terminus and Lys-7,21,23, and secondly by additionally deamidating the C-terminus. The coordination number for Gdm+ peptide-interactions was 11.0 in the +1 simulation, corresponding to a local concentration of Gdm+ of 1.13 relative to the bulk concentration (Supplementary Material Table ), and further enhancement of the negative surface charge density is expected to yield local concentrations approaching that measured experimentally for bovine serum albumin. As expected, Gdm+ interacts strongly with the C-terminal carboxylate group in the +1 simulation (not shown).
These observations indicate that the experimentally observed accumulation of Gdm+ at the protein surface 1,2 can be understood in terms of the properties of this complex cation. While a dominant interaction of urea with surface groups in protein simulations involves hydrogen bonding with polar side-chain functions 4,5,6, the unique hydration properties of the Gdm+ ion 7 support alternative interaction modes involving stacking with side-chain planar and hydrophobic groups. The existence of these binding modes is supported by experimental observations of extremely high sensitivity to Gdm+ denaturation of tryptophan-zipper peptides in which side-chain indole-indole interactions provide the dominant contribution to the stability of the folded state 12. This strong stacking with side-chain aromatic groups may also explain the particularly effective promotion of water solubility of the aromatic amino acids by GdmCl 21. Overall, these observations reinforce the utility of MD simulations in providing interpretations of the interactions of ions at the protein surface at the molecular scale (e.g., 22).
This project was supported by grant No. GM63018 from the National Institutes of Health.
1. (1984). Protein stabilization and destabilization by guanidinium salts. Biochemistry 23, 5924–5929. PubMed
2. (2001). Thermodynamics of interactions of urea and guanidinium salts with protein surface: relationship between solute effects on protein processes and changes in water-accessible surface area. Prot. Sci. 10, 2485–2497. PubMed
3. (2005). Predicting the energetics of osmolyte-induced protein folding/unfolding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15065–15068. CrossRef | PubMed
4. (1997). Molecular dynamics simulations of the unfolding of barnase in water and 8M aqueous urea. Biochemistry 36, 7313–7329. PubMed
5. (1999). Structural details of urea binding to barnase: a molecular dynamics analysis. Struct. Fold. Des. 7, 477–488. PubMed
6. (2003). The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5142–5147. CrossRef | PubMed
7. (2003). The hydration structure of guanidinium and thiocyanate ions: implications for protein stability in aqueous solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4557–4561. CrossRef | PubMed
8. (2004). The structure of aqueous guanidinium chloride solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11462–11470. CrossRef | PubMed
9. (2005). Nanometer-scale ion aggregates in aqueous electrolyte solutions: guanidinium sulfate and guanidinium thiocyanate. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 24185–24196. PubMed
10. (1984). Solvation of hydrophobic species in aqueous urea solution—a molecular-dynamics study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 5794–5800. CrossRef | PubMed
11. (1990). A model for the partial reversal of hydrophobic hydration by addition of a urea-like cosolvent. J. Phys. Chem. 94, 3856–3859. CrossRef | PubMed
12. (2005). Dissecting contributions to the denaturant sensitivities of proteins. Biochemistry 44, 775–781. PubMed
13. (1982). The structure of melittin. structure determination and partial refinement. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 6010–6015. PubMed
14. (1980). High-resolution H1NMR studies of self-aggregation of melittin in aqueous-solution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 622, 231–244. PubMed
15. (1983). CHARMM—a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187–217. CrossRef | PubMed
16. (1983). Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935. CrossRef | PubMed
17. (1996). The anomeric equilibrium in d-xylose: free energy and the role of solvent structuring. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 541–546. CrossRef | PubMed
18. (1996). Anisotropic solvent structuring in aqueous sugar solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 12276–12286. CrossRef | PubMed
19. (1997). Molecular dynamics studies of the hydration of α,α-trehalose. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7851–7862. CrossRef | PubMed
20. (1996). VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38. CrossRef | PubMed
21. (1970). Solubility of amino acids, diglycine, and triglycine in aqueous guanidine hydrochloride solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 245, 1648–1652. PubMed
22. (2006). Quantification and rationalization of the higher affinity of sodium over potassium to protein surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15440–15444. CrossRef | PubMed