| Spontaneous Creation of Macroscopic Flow and Metachronal Waves in an Array of Cilia Biophysical Journal, Volume 92, Issue 6, 15 March 2007, Pages 1900-1917 Boris Guirao and Jean-François Joanny Abstract Cells carrying cilia on their surface show many striking features: alignment of cilia in an array, two-phase asymmetric beating for each cilium, and existence of metachronal coordination with a constant phase difference between two adjacent cilia. We give simple theoretical arguments based on hydrodynamic coupling and an internal mechanism of the cilium derived from the behavior of a collection of molecular motors to account qualitatively for these cooperative features. Hydrodynamic interactions can lead to the alignment of an array of cilia. We study the effect of a transverse external flow and obtain a two-phase asymmetrical beating, faster along the flow and slower against the flow, proceeding around an average curved position. We show that an aligned array of cilia is able to spontaneously break the left-right symmetry and to create a global average flow. Metachronal coordination arises as a consequence of the internal mechanism of the cilia and their hydrodynamic couplings, with a wavelength comparable to that found in experiments. It allows the cilia to start beating at a lower adenosine-triphosphate threshold and at a higher frequency than for a single cilium. It also leads to a rather stationary flow, which might be its major advantage. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (5944 kb) |
| “Entropic Traps” in the Kinetics of Phase Separation in Multicomponent Membranes Stabilize Nanodomains Biophysical Journal, Volume 91, Issue 1, 1 July 2006, Pages 189-205 V.A.J. Frolov, Y.A. Chizmadzhev, F.S. Cohen and J. Zimmerberg Abstract We quantitatively describe the creation and evolution of phase-separated domains in a multicomponent lipid bilayer membrane. The early stages, termed the nucleation stage and the independent growth stage, are extremely rapid (characteristic times are submillisecond and millisecond, respectively) and the system consists of nanodomains of average radius ∼5–50nm. Next, mobility of domains becomes consequential; domain merger and fission become the dominant mechanisms of matter exchange, and line tension is the main determinant of the domain size distribution at any point in time. For sufficiently small , the decrease in the entropy term that results from domain merger is larger than the decrease in boundary energy, and only nanodomains are present. For large , the decrease in boundary energy dominates the unfavorable entropy of merger, and merger leads to rapid enlargement of nanodomains to radii of micrometer scale. At intermediate line tensions and within finite times, nanodomains can remain dispersed and coexist with a new global phase. The theoretical critical value of line tension needed to rapidly form large rafts is in accord with the experimental estimate from the curvatures of budding domains in giant unilamellar vesicles. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (264 kb) |
| Mechanokinetics of Rapid Tension Recovery in Muscle: The Myosin Working Stroke Is Followed by a Slower Release of Phosphate Biophysical Journal, Volume 87, Issue 1, 1 July 2004, Pages 442-456 David A. Smith and John Sleep Abstract Crystallographic and biochemical evidence suggests that the myosin working stroke that generates force in muscle is accompanied by the release of inorganic phosphate (Pi), but the order and relative speed of these transitions is not firmly established. To address this problem, the theory of A. F. Huxley and R. M. Simmons for the length-step response is averaged over elastic strains imposed by filament structure and extended to include a Pi-release transition. Models of this kind are applied to existing tension-recovery data from length steps at different phosphate concentrations, and from phosphate jumps upon release of caged phosphate. This body of data is simulated by the model in which the force-generating event is followed by Pi release. A version in which the Pi-release transition is slow provides a better fit than a version with rapid Pi release and a slow transition preceding force generation. If Pi is released before force generation, the predicted rate of slow recovery increases with the size of the step, which is not observed. Some implications for theories of muscle contraction are discussed. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (317 kb) |
Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.
Biophysical Journal, Volume 93, Issue 11, L52-L54, 1 December 2007
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.118448
Biophysical Letters
Erel Levine*, Eshel Ben Jacob*, † and Herbert Levine*,
, 
* Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
† School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Address reprint requests and inquiries to Erel Levine.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small RNA molecules that regulate genes post-transcriptionally through specific basepairing with messenger RNAs. In recent years, miRNAs in flies, fish, worms, and humans have been shown to be involved in pathways of development, programmed cell death, and cancer. In all known cases, microRNAs silence a target gene or, more often, a set of target genes. (For reviews, see, e.g., 1,2.)
While evidence for the functional roles of miRNA keeps accumulating, the mechanism by which gene silencing is achieved has remained elusive 3,4. Early reports suggested that unlike the reduced protein level, the level of polysomes is not affected by microRNAs, as long as the miRNA-mRNA basepairing is imperfect. This is in contrast with the RNAi pathway, in which small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules bind mRNA targets through perfect basepairing, directly promoting cleavage 5. However, recent findings suggest that this idea may be oversimplified 6,7,8. For example, a recent set of reports presents contradictory results even for a specific miRNA 9,10,11.
Although the detailed mechanism is as yet unknown, evidence point in favor of a two-step model, where binding of miRNA to the mRNA promotes a secondary process (e.g., ribosome runoff or deadenylation) which ultimately leads to mRNA accumulation in its processed state, perhaps in specific cellular structures such as processing bodies or stress granules 12,13. The existence of the second step suggests that some parts of this mechanism (affecting the transition from bound to processed state) are controlled by cellular components in a global fashion, obeying the same dynamical rules for all miRNA regulated targets. Here we use a modeling approach to compare target-specific versus global contributions to different observables, focusing on the differential effects on mRNA and protein levels.
We assume that the dynamical variables are three different mRNA concentrations: free mRNA denoted by m; bound miRNA-mRNA, denoted by m*; processed mRNA, denoted by m**; and the free miRNA concentration, given by s. Each of these states has a fixed interaction with other pieces of cellular machinery (such as ribosomes, degradation enzymes, etc.) and hence can be characterized by a set of reaction parameters (governing protein production rates, decay, etc.) from that state. Binding (unbinding) of a free mRNA to a miRNA occurs with rate κ+ (κ–); η+ (η–) are the transition rate to (from) the processed state; and three λ-rates define degradation of the mRNA at its different states. This formulation leads directly to the mass-action equations
![]() | (1) |
Key to our analysis is the assumption that the binding and degradation rates, κ± and λ, are specific to the mRNA-miRNA pair, whereas the transition rates are global, the same for all complexes in a given cell. Underlying this assumption is accumulating evidence suggesting that the transition to the processed state is a multistep process, which involves many cellular components 3,4. The availability of these components, and thus the rates they infer, are likely to be condition-dependent.
Let us first focus on the case when miRNAs are extremely abundant in the cell. Here, there are no free mRNAs and one readily finds that the ratio of bound mRNA in the unprocessed to processed states is just
Given this ratio, the fold of reduction in mRNA and protein level is given, respectively, by
![]() | (2) |
Very different effects on mRNA and protein levels are expected for those targets with small θ, namely those that spend significant time in the processed state. This requires that cellular conditions would set
Still, even under such conditions, distinct effects on mRNA and protein levels would only occur for those targets for which
is at most comparable with η+.
In contrast, for targets characterized by a large θ, the levels of protein and mRNA are equally repressed (wM≈wP). For those targets which are efficiently degraded in the processed state,
the degradation rate of mRNA is effectively replaced by the global parameter η+. Conversely, if a large value of θ is only the result of the ratio between global parameters, then wM≈λm/
, which is not expected to be large.
It is therefore possible that the same miRNA would strongly affect the mRNA level of one target but not on that of another; similarly, the same miRNA-target pair may exhibit different behavior under different cellular conditions (Figure 1A). This enables the cell to accomplish disparate goals. For example, preventing inadvertent fluctuations from producing protein in cells that are to be permanently silenced would necessitate removing the mRNA; keeping a gene off in a state that would allow rapid switching on would best be accomplished by keeping mRNA high and obviating the need for new transcription.
has its mRNA level unaltered while protein level is strongly repressed, whereas a target with large
experiences similar repression in both mRNA and protein level. (B) For a target with two binding sites, the ratio proteins/mRNA may differ as the abundance of miRNA changes. Dashed lines are the ratios wM/wP using
=0.1 (bottom) or
=10 (top). (C) The equilibrium constant characterizing the level of miRNA at the onset of repression can be changed significantly by global factors for a target with highly unstable in the processed state but not for a target which is relatively stable (large and small
, respectively). To ease the presentation Keq of the second target is scaled-down by a factor 10. Unless noted otherwise, we set (arbitrarily, and thus with no specifying units) λ=λ*=λ**/10, η–=η+/8=1, and κ+=κ−/10=10.Our prediction can easily be tested on a global scale, by comparing the effect of endogenously introduced miRNA on the level of mRNA (using DNA microarray) and on the level of proteins (e.g., using protein microarray) under different conditions. Under stressful conditions, processing bodies accumulate, and one expects an increased η+. One would then be able to identify target which show “inconsistent” behavior, such as the black target in Figure 1A.
Many target mRNAs have multiple binding sites for a specific miRNA. Within our model, this number should affect the miRNA binding rates (κ) but not the transition rates (η); the latter are probably dominated by transport, not by reactions. From Eq. (2) we therefore find that the number of binding sites can only affect the strength of repression if the rate of mRNA degradation at the processed state
is influenced by the number n of bound miRNA. Now global parameters appear through a set of values
A suggestive interpretation of the results is through an effective parameter θeff, which changes, as the miRNA concentration increases, from one θn to the next. This can have some interesting consequences, as we have seen, e.g., that θ is what controls the ratio of protein to mRNA suppression (Figure 1B). In general, since θeff determines the effect of global parameters on the behavior of a given target, this behavior may change with the miRNA level.
The limit q=0 is the case where miRNAs act as enzymes to catalyze the suppression of free mRNA. This has typically been shown to be the case for siRNA in the RNAi pathway 14. In this case, the free-mRNA concentration at a given miRNA concentration s is m=αm/λm[1+wM(s/Keq)]/[1+(s/Keq)], with
![]() | (3) |
Unlike what occurs for transcriptional regulation, here the equilibrium constant and the strength of repression (wM) are not independent. In both cases, however, this factor is independent of the transcription rate of the target mRNA, and specifically of the number of copies of its genes. This is in contrast to observations made in Doench and Sharp 15, and to the stoichiometric mode, as discussed below.
The more general case q>0 allows for the possibility that cleavage of an mRNA molecule in the processed state is accompanied by turnover of the bound miRNA. This scenario is motivated by the fact that the processed state may be thought of as a localization to a cytoplasmic body, which is enriched in ribonucleatic agents. Moreover, the q=0 steady-state limit is only valid if all the relevant timescales (such as, e.g., escape from the cytoplasmic body) are shorter than the biologically relevant time. It is instructive to solve first the equations for nonfree mRNA in Eq. (1), yielding
![]() | (4) |
All global parameters appear here through Keq and Q. This form of the model reveals an interesting symmetry between free mRNA and free miRNA steady-state pools. A model of this form has been introduced for a class of bacterial small RNA that may cleave along with their mRNA target 16,17.The steady-state mRNA concentration is given now by
with ɛ=λs/Keq. Expecting ɛ to be small compared with other rates, silencing is accomplished when the miRNA synthesis rate αs exceeds Qαm+ɛ, reflecting a competition between the miRNA synthesis and the rescaled mRNA transcription 16,17. Thus, the synthesis rate of miRNA determines the repression strength, whereas the steady-state concentration of free miRNA determines the sharpness of the transition. In contrast to the catalytic case, here the fold of repression mediated by a given miRNA transcription rate depends strongly on the target mRNA amount, as suggested by Doench and Sharp 15.
In some organisms (e.g., plants and nematodes), RNA interference is accompanied by amplification of the siRNA population 18. This amplification is the result of synthesis of siRNAs initiated by binding of an siRNA to its target. Within our model, siRNA amplification can be modeled by having q<0. The significance of miRNA amplification is most transparent when |Q|>ɛ/αm. Now, the repression is finite even for small αs, indeed it is finite in the limit αs→0+, where it takes the value ɛ/(|Q|α).
This work has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation (CTBP grants No. PHY-0216576 and No. PHY-0225630), and the Tauber fund.
1. (2004). MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (670 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
2. (2005). Ribo-gnome: the big world of small RNAs. Science 309, 1519–1524. CrossRef | PubMed
3. (2007). How do microRNAs regulate gene expression?. Sci. STKE 2007, , re1. PubMed
4. (2007). Repression of protein synthesis by miRNAs: how many mechanisms?. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 118–126. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (589 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
5. (2000). RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals. Cell 101, 25–33. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (368 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
6. (2005). Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature 433, 769–773. CrossRef | PubMed
7. (2006). Genome-wide analysis of mRNAs regulated by Drosha and Argonaute proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2965–2975. CrossRef | PubMed
8. (2006). Effects of Dicer and Argonaute down-regulation on mRNA levels in human HEK293 cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 4801–4815. CrossRef | PubMed
9. (2005). Regulation by let-7 and lin-4 miRNAs results in target mRNA degradation. Cell 122, 553–563. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (453 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
10. (1999). The lin-4 regulatory RNA controls developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans by blocking LIN-14 protein synthesis after the initiation of translation. Dev. Biol. 216, 671–680. CrossRef | PubMed
11. (2002). Two genetic circuits repress the Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene lin-28 after translation initiation. Dev. Biol. 243, 215–225. CrossRef | PubMed
12. (2006). Function and localization of microRNAs in mammalian cells. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 71, 29–38. CrossRef | PubMed
13. (2005). MicroRNA-dependent localization of targeted mRNAs to mammalian P-bodies. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 719–723. CrossRef | PubMed
14. (2004). Kinetic analysis of the RNAi enzyme complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 599–606. CrossRef | PubMed
15. (2004). Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression. Genes Dev. 18, 504–511. CrossRef | PubMed
16. (2004). The small RNA chaperone Hfq and multiple small RNAs control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. Cell 118, 69–82. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (706 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed
17. (2007). Quantitative characteristics of gene silencing by small RNA. PLoS Biol. 5, e229. CrossRef | PubMed
18. (2003). RNA interference: traveling in the cell and gaining functions?. Trends Genet. 19, 39–46. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (358 kb) | CrossRef | PubMed